Skip to content

Phase I Study of Ixabepilone Plus Lapatinib With or Without Capecitabine in the Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer

Parallel Phase I Study of Ixabepilone Plus Lapatinib and Ixabepilone Plus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Subjects With HER2 Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00634088
Enrollment
13
Registered
2008-03-12
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2016-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and preliminary effectiveness of ixabepilone plus lapatinib with and without capecitabine in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or metastatic breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGIxabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1000 mg

Lapatinib, 1000 mg, administered orally, once a day, every day, for 7 to 14 consecutive days as a lead-in period prior to the first administration of ixabepilone (Day 1). Following the lapatinib lead-in phase of Cycle 1, and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles, ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2, administered as a 3-hour IV infusion. Lapatinib, 1000 mg, administered orally, once a day, every day, for a 21-day cycle.

DRUGIxabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg

Initiated a minimum of 14 days following Day 1 of previous cohort (ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2 + lapatinib, 1000 mg). Lapatinib, 1250 mg, administered orally once a day, every day, for 7 to 14 consecutive days as a lead-in period prior to the first administration of ixabepilone. Following the lapatinib lead-in phase of Cycle 1, and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles, ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2, administered as a 3-hour IV infusion. Lapatinib administered, 1250 mg, orally, once a day, every day, for a 21-day cycle.

DRUGIxabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg

Initiated a minimum of 14 days following Day 1 of previous cohort (ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2 + lapatinib, 1250 mg). Lapatinib, 1250 mg, administered orally once a day, every day, for 7 to 14 consecutive days as a lead-in period prior to the first administration of ixabepilone. Following the lapatinib lead-in phase of Cycle 1, and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles, ixabepilone, 40 mg/m\^2, administered as a 3-hour IV infusion. Lapatinib, 1250 mg, administered orally, once a day, every day, for a 21-day cycle.

DRUGIxabepilone + Lapatinib + Capecitabine

Planned escalating doses of the triplet combination of ixabepilone, lapatinib, and capecitabine. No participants were enrolled in this arm due to premature termination of the study.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
R-Pharm
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females aged 18 years or older with histologic or cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma originating in the breast * Radiologic or pathologic evidence that the cancer is metastatic or locally advanced (a T4 tumor and stage IIIB/IIIC disease) and not curable by local measures, such as radiation or surgery * Positive status for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 * Measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors guidelines * Karnofsky performance status of 70 to 100 * Life expectancy of at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Prior radiation must not have included 30% or more of major bone-marrow containing areas, such as the pelvis and lumbar spine * Common Terminology Criteria Grade 2 or greater neuropathy * Inadequate hematologic, hepatic, or renal function * Known prior severe hypersensitivity reactions to agents containing Cremophor® EL or known hypersensitivity or prior intolerance to fluoropyrimidine * Known or suspected dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency * More than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting * Prior treatment with an epothilone or lapatinib; prior treatment with capecitabine within the past 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ixabepilone When Administered With LapatinibDays 1 through 21The MTD is defined as the maximum dose that can be administered to 6 participants such that no more than 1 (or fewer than one third if more than 6 participants receive treatment) experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with at least 2 experiencing a DLT at the next higher dose level. The RP2D is based on the MTD and the assessment of any relevant chronic toxicities.
MTD and RP2D of Ixabepilone When Administered With Lapatinib Plus CapecitabineDays 1 through 21MTD is defined as the maximum dose that can be administered to 6 participants such that no more than 1 (or fewer than one third if more than 6 participants receive treatment) experiences a DLT, with at least 2 experiencing a DLT at the next higher dose level. The RP2D is based on the MTD and the assessment of any relevant chronic toxicities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeBaseline and weekly from Days 1 to 21 (Cycle 1)CTC, Version 3.0 used to assess parameters. ULN=upper level of normal among all laboratory ranges. WBC (c/L): Grade (Gr)1:\<LLN to 3.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<3.0 to 2.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<2.0 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<1.0\*10\^9/L; ANC (c/uL): Gr 1:\<LLN to 1.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<1.5 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L; Platelet count (c/uL): Gr 1:LLN to 75.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<75.0 to 50.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0\*10\^9/L; Hemoglobin (g/dL): Gr 1:\<LLN to 10.0 g/dL, Gr 2:\<10.0 to 8.0 g/dL, Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAt baseline and within 72 hours of Day 1 of 21-day cycleCTC, Version 3.0 used to assess parameters. ULN=upper level of normal among all laboratory ranges. ALT(U/L) Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\*ULN,Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN,Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN,Gr 4:\>20.0\* ULN; AST(U/L) Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\* ULN,Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN,Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN,Gr 4:\>20.0\* ULN; ALP(U/L)Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>20.0\*ULN; Creatinine (mg/dL): Gr 1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>3.0-6.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>6.0\*ULN; Total bilirubin (mg/dL): Gr 1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>10.0\*ULN
Maximum Concentration of IxabepiloneDay 1 of 21-day cycle
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneDay 1 of 21-day cycle
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Baseline to Day 21, continuouslyAE=Any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical event that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, important, a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs existing hospitalization. Treatment related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment. Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling.
Time to Peak Concentration of IxabepiloneDay 1 of 21-day cycle
Volume of Distribution at Steady State of IxabepiloneDay 1 of 21-day cycle
Overall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsBaseline and Day 21 (21-day cycle)Target lesion criteria: Complete Response(CR)=Disappearance of all clinical and radiologic evidence of target lesions; Partial Response (PR)=A 30% or greater decrease in the sum of longest diameter(LD) of all lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD. Stable Disease (SD)=Insufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD) and insufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR; PD=A 20% or greater increase in the sum of LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.
Duration of Response of Combination Treatment With Ixabepilone Plus LapatinibFirst occurrence of PR or CR to PD or Death (no average, as no data available)Duration of response is measured from the time in months that measurement criteria are first met for PR or CR, whichever is recorded first, until the date of documented PD or death. Participants who neither relapse nor die will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment.
Terminal Half-life of IxabepiloneDay 1 of 21-day cycle
Number of Participants With DLTBaseline to Day 21, continuouslyDLT=Any of the following events, attributable to study drug and occurring within 21 days after ixabepilone administration: Grade 3 or 4 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite the use of adequate medical intervention; other Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity requiring removal from study drug; recovery from study drug-related toxicity that delayed scheduled retreatment for longer than 3 weeks; Grade 4 neutropenia for 5 or more consecutive days or Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia of any duration with sepsis or fever; thrombocytopenia or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion.

Countries

Australia, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 13 participants enrolled, 10 received treatment with ixabepilone + lapatinib in escalating-dose cohorts. No participants were enrolled in the ixabepilone + lapatinib + capecitabine cohort due to premature termination of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1000 mg
Lapatinib administered daily in escalating cohorts, beginning with 1000 mg, orally once a day, for 7 to 14 consecutive days in Cycle 1 prior to the first administration of ixabepilone. Then lapatinib administered daily, orally once a day, for a 21-day cycle. After the lapatinib lead-in phase, ixabepilone administered as a 3-hour IV infusion in escalating doses, beginning with 32 mg/m\^2.
6
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg
Initiated a minimum of 14 days following Day 1 of previous cohort (ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2 + lapatinib, 1000 mg), lapatinib 1250 mg administered orally once a day, every day, for 7 to 14 consecutive days prior to the first administration of ixabepilone. Then lapatinib administered orally once a day, every day, for a 21-day cycle. After lapatinib lead-in period, ixabepilone administered as a 3-hour IV infusion of 32 mg/m\^2.
3
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg
Initiated a minimum of 14 days following Day 1 of previous cohort (ixabepilone, 32 mg/m\^2 + lapatinib, 1250 mg), lapatinib 1250 mg administered orally once a day, every day for 7 to 14 consecutive days prior to the first administration of ixabepilone in Cycle 1. Then lapatinib administered daily, orally once a day, for a 21-day cycle. Ixabepilone administered as a 3-hour IV infusion of 40 mg/m\^2 following lapatinib lead-in period.
1
Ixabepilone + Lapatinib + Capecitabine
A triplet combination of ixabepilone, lapatinib, and capecitabine was planned for analysis in escalating doses but was not initiated due to premature termination of the study.
0
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Time Period 1: Dose Level 1Adverse Event3000
Time Period 1: Dose Level 1Disease progression2000
Time Period 1: Dose Level 1Physician Decision1000
Time Period 2: Dose Level 2Adverse Event0200
Time Period 2: Dose Level 2Progressive disease0100
Time Period 3: Dose Level 3Progressive disease0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIxabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1000 mgTotalIxabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mgIxabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg
Age, Customized
50 years and older to younger than 65 years
4 participants7 participants1 participants2 participants
Age, Customized
65 years and older
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
Younger than 50 years
1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Gender
Female
6 participants10 participants1 participants3 participants
Gender
Male
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 participants9 participants1 participants3 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 63 / 31 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 60 / 31 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ixabepilone When Administered With Lapatinib

The MTD is defined as the maximum dose that can be administered to 6 participants such that no more than 1 (or fewer than one third if more than 6 participants receive treatment) experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with at least 2 experiencing a DLT at the next higher dose level. The RP2D is based on the MTD and the assessment of any relevant chronic toxicities.

Time frame: Days 1 through 21

Population: Because the study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment, MTD was not achieved.

Primary

MTD and RP2D of Ixabepilone When Administered With Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine

MTD is defined as the maximum dose that can be administered to 6 participants such that no more than 1 (or fewer than one third if more than 6 participants receive treatment) experiences a DLT, with at least 2 experiencing a DLT at the next higher dose level. The RP2D is based on the MTD and the assessment of any relevant chronic toxicities.

Time frame: Days 1 through 21

Population: Because the study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment, no participants received the triplet combination.

Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of Ixabepilone

Time frame: Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: Participants who received ixabepilone with lapatinib treatment and had pharmacokinetic parameters available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
All TreatedArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(INF)2212.9 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 1030.4
All TreatedArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(O-T)1851.8 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 880.5
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(INF)2427.0 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 225.5
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(O-T)2082.0 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 133.6
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(INF)1610.7 ng*h/mL
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Infinity (AUC[INF]) and AUC From 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[O-T] of IxabepiloneAUC(O-T)1284.2 ng*h/mL
Secondary

Duration of Response of Combination Treatment With Ixabepilone Plus Lapatinib

Duration of response is measured from the time in months that measurement criteria are first met for PR or CR, whichever is recorded first, until the date of documented PD or death. Participants who neither relapse nor die will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment.

Time frame: First occurrence of PR or CR to PD or Death (no average, as no data available)

Population: Because the study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment, the duration of response could not be analyzed.

Secondary

Maximum Concentration of Ixabepilone

Time frame: Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: Participants who received ixabepilone with lapatinib treatment and had pharmacokinetic parameters available.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
All TreatedMaximum Concentration of Ixabepilone200.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 78.4
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dMaximum Concentration of Ixabepilone109.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.1
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dMaximum Concentration of Ixabepilone133.4 ng/mL
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC Grade

CTC, Version 3.0 used to assess parameters. ULN=upper level of normal among all laboratory ranges. WBC (c/L): Grade (Gr)1:\<LLN to 3.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<3.0 to 2.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<2.0 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<1.0\*10\^9/L; ANC (c/uL): Gr 1:\<LLN to 1.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<1.5 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L; Platelet count (c/uL): Gr 1:LLN to 75.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<75.0 to 50.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0\*10\^9/L; Hemoglobin (g/dL): Gr 1:\<LLN to 10.0 g/dL, Gr 2:\<10.0 to 8.0 g/dL, Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL.

Time frame: Baseline and weekly from Days 1 to 21 (Cycle 1)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of ixabepilone and either lapatinib or capecitabine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 4)2 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 1)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 2)3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWhite blood cell count (WBC) (Grade 1)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 2)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 3)2 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 4)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAbsolute neutrophil count (ANC) (Grade 1)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 2)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 1)3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 3)2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 4)2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAbsolute neutrophil count (ANC) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 1)1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 3)3 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 1)3 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWhite blood cell count (WBC) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 3)1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 1)6 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 2)4 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeHemoglobin (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWhite blood cell count (WBC) (Grade 1)1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAbsolute neutrophil count (ANC) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeANC (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 1)2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradePlatelet count (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Hematology Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeWBC (Grade 2)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC Grade

CTC, Version 3.0 used to assess parameters. ULN=upper level of normal among all laboratory ranges. ALT(U/L) Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\*ULN,Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN,Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN,Gr 4:\>20.0\* ULN; AST(U/L) Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\* ULN,Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN,Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN,Gr 4:\>20.0\* ULN; ALP(U/L)Gr 1:\>ULN-2.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>2.5-5.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>20.0\*ULN; Creatinine (mg/dL): Gr 1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>3.0-6.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>6.0\*ULN; Total bilirubin (mg/dL): Gr 1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, Gr 2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, Gr 3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, Gr 4:\>10.0\*ULN

Time frame: At baseline and within 72 hours of Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of ixabepilone and either lapatinib or capecitabine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Grade 1)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 1)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlkaline phosphatase (ALP) (Grade 1)3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 1)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 4)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAspartate aminotransferase (AST) (Grade 1)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 3)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 2)0 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlkaline phosphatase (ALP) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAspartate aminotransferase (AST) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAspartate aminotransferase (AST) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAlkaline phosphatase (ALP) (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeTotal bilirubin (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALT (Grade 2)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeALP (Grade 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 3)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeCreatinine (Grade 1)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Results by Worst CTC GradeAST (Grade 2)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)

AE=Any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical event that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, important, a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs existing hospitalization. Treatment related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment. Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 21, continuously

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of ixabepilone and either lapatinib or capecitabine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4)3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN4 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN (Grade 3 or 4)1 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)AEs leading to discontinuation3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Death3 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs6 Participants
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)SAEs2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4)3 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)SAEs0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)AEs leading to discontinuation2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN2 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs3 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN (Grade 3 or 4)1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Death0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN (Grade 3 or 4)0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Death0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)SAEs1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)AEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4)1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment-related AEs, Treatment-related AEs (Grade 3 or 4), Peripheral Neuropathy (PN), PN (Grade 3 or 4)PN0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With DLT

DLT=Any of the following events, attributable to study drug and occurring within 21 days after ixabepilone administration: Grade 3 or 4 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite the use of adequate medical intervention; other Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity requiring removal from study drug; recovery from study drug-related toxicity that delayed scheduled retreatment for longer than 3 weeks; Grade 4 neutropenia for 5 or more consecutive days or Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia of any duration with sepsis or fever; thrombocytopenia or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 21, continuously

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of ixabepilone and either lapatinib or capecitabine.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All TreatedNumber of Participants With DLT1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With DLT0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dNumber of Participants With DLT0 Participants
Secondary

Overall Tumor Response By Number of Participants

Target lesion criteria: Complete Response(CR)=Disappearance of all clinical and radiologic evidence of target lesions; Partial Response (PR)=A 30% or greater decrease in the sum of longest diameter(LD) of all lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD. Stable Disease (SD)=Insufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD) and insufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR; PD=A 20% or greater increase in the sum of LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 21 (21-day cycle)

Population: All participants with measurable disease at baseline per RECIST guidelines, with the exception of those with an incorrect diagnosis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
All TreatedOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsCR3 Participants 12.2
All TreatedOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPR0 Participants
All TreatedOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsSD3 Participants
All TreatedOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPD0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPD0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsCR2 Participants 2.1
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsSD1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPR0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPD0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsPR0 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsSD1 Participants
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dOverall Tumor Response By Number of ParticipantsCR0 Participants
Secondary

Terminal Half-life of Ixabepilone

Time frame: Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: Participants who received ixabepilone with lapatinib treatment and had pharmacokinetic parameters available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All TreatedTerminal Half-life of Ixabepilone51.6 HoursStandard Deviation 13.2
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dTerminal Half-life of Ixabepilone63.1 HoursStandard Deviation 10.4
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dTerminal Half-life of Ixabepilone33.1 Hours
Secondary

Time to Peak Concentration of Ixabepilone

Time frame: Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: Participants who received ixabepilone with lapatinib treatment and had pharmacokinetic parameters available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All TreatedTime to Peak Concentration of Ixabepilone3.0 Hours
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dTime to Peak Concentration of Ixabepilone3.0 Hours
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dTime to Peak Concentration of Ixabepilone2.9 Hours
Secondary

Volume of Distribution at Steady State of Ixabepilone

Time frame: Day 1 of 21-day cycle

Population: Participants who received ixabepilone with lapatinib treatment and had pharmacokinetic parameters available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All TreatedVolume of Distribution at Steady State of Ixabepilone1484.3 LitersStandard Deviation 438.5
Ixabepilone, 32 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dVolume of Distribution at Steady State of Ixabepilone1780.8 LitersStandard Deviation 237.9
Ixabepilone, 40 mg/m^2 + Lapatinib, 1250 mg/dVolume of Distribution at Steady State of Ixabepilone1915.8 Liters

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026