Skip to content

Isavuconazole in the Treatment of Renally Impaired Aspergillosis and Rare Fungi

Open-label Study of Isavuconazole in the Treatment of Participants With Aspergillosis and Renal Impairment or of Participants With Invasive Fungal Disease Caused by Rare Moulds, Yeasts or Dimorphic Fungi

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00634049
Acronym
VITAL
Enrollment
149
Registered
2008-03-12
Start date
2008-04-22
Completion date
2016-05-05
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergillosis, Invasive Fungal Infections

Keywords

invasive fungal infections caused by rare molds, rare yeasts, BAL8557, Isavuconazole, Aspergillosis, or by dimorphic fungi, ASP9766

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in the treatment of renally impaired participants with invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus and participants with invasive fungal disease caused by rare fungi.

Detailed description

Acute invasive fungal infections caused by aspergillus, rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi are life threatening diseases. Early treatment with highly effective anti-fungals reduces mortality. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in participants with aspergillosis and renal impairment, and in participants suffering from invasive infections from rare fungi.

Interventions

DRUGisavuconazole

Administration of 200 mg isavuconazole 3 times a day in the vein (IV) or oral as a capsule for 2 days, followed by daily administration of 200 mg isavuconazole (IV) or oral

Sponsors

Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

•Participants meeting EORTC/MSG (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group) definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD (invasive fungal disease) caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e. fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species) whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis) who require primary therapy for their IFD at the time of enrollment. OR •Participants who had proven or probable zygomycosis, whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis), who require primary therapy. Zygomycosis must be documented by culture or histology / cytology. OR •Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were refractory to current treatment defined as, * Clear documentation of progression of disease. Note: radiological progression only in association with white blood cell (WBC) count recovery was not acceptable. * Failure to improve clinically despite receiving at least 7 days of standard antifungal regimen. Prior to enrolling patients who fell into this category, the Medical Monitor was contacted for approval. OR • Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were intolerant to current treatment for example: * Doubling of serum creatinine value to higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN) within 48 hours. * Serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/mL and current treatment with polyene or IV voriconazole. * Other significant drug-related adverse reaction(s) to the current antifungal agent, resulting in discontinuation of the treatment, e.g., persistence of visual disturbance, allergic reaction, phototoxicity or severe infusion reaction (hypertensive crisis, severe chills or shock). * Documented inability to achieve adequate blood levels of posaconazole, voriconazole or itraconazole.

Exclusion criteria

* A known condition of the participants that may jeopardize adherence to the protocol requirements * Participants who are unlikely to survive 30 days * Participants with a body weight \< 40 kg * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success \[Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success \[Eradication and Presumed eradication\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success \[Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\], \[Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\]; and \[Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success \[Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\] and \[Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success \[Eradication,Presumed eradication\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success \[≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to \< 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to \< 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsFrom the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drugA Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Israel, Lebanon, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Consenting adult participants with proven, probable or possible invasive aspergillosis and renally impaired (RI) or of participants with invasive fungal disease (IFD) caused by rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were considered for entry into the study.

Pre-assignment details

Analysis and interpretation of the results was pathogen dependent and each pathogen was quite rare, therefore it was not feasible to enroll a sufficient number of participants in a randomized controlled trial to power the study adequately to allow statistical comparisons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Isavuconazole
Participants received a loading dose of isavuconazole, 200 mg three times a day administered intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) \[or per os (PO)\] for the first 2 days followed by a maintenance dose from Day 3 of 200 mg once daily either IV or orally until they reached a treatment endpoint or for a maximum of 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria.
146
Total146

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDied prior to receiving study drug1
Overall StudyNever received study drug1
Overall StudyScreening failure1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIsavuconazole
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.78
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)/Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
No
120 participants
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)/Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Yes
26 participants
Corticosteroid use
No
111 participants
Corticosteroid use
Yes
35 participants
Hematologic malignancy
No
83 participants
Hematologic malignancy
Yes
63 participants
Neutropenic
Missing
42 participants
Neutropenic
No
66 participants
Neutropenic
Yes
38 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
124 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
108 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants
T-cell immunosuppressant use
Missing
37 participants
T-cell immunosuppressant use
No
48 participants
T-cell immunosuppressant use
Yes
61 participants
Therapy status
Intolerant
12 participants
Therapy status
Missing
3 participants
Therapy status
Primary Therapy
93 participants
Therapy status
Refractory
38 participants
Uncontrolled malignancy
No
100 participants
Uncontrolled malignancy
Yes
46 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
54 / 5968 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 5946 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).

The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate30.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate30.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate66.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate31.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate14.3 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate9.5 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate36.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate9.1 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate36.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate41.2 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate47.1 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate64.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate44.8 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate41.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate64.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate36.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate36.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate72.7 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 42- Success Rate13.3 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate14.3 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).Day 84 - Success Rate13.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84

All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Intent-To-Treat population (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84All-cause Mortality Through Day 4222.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84All-cause Mortality Through Day 8430.5 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84All-cause Mortality Through Day 4216.1 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84All-cause Mortality Through Day 8420.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT

The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success \[Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate55.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate55.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate45.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate66.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate75.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate55.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate40.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate22.2 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate33.3 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate22.2 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate62.5 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate68.8 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate81.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate71.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate85.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate42.9 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate82.8 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate79.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate82.1 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate70.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate70.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate70.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate42.9 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate38.5 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate35.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT

The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success \[Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\] and \[Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4260.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)60.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8455.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8455.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)75.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4275.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)42.9 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4250.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8421.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)28.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4228.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8425.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4225.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8420.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)66.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8462.5 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4281.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)81.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4285.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)71.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8442.9 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8482.2 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4275.9 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)79.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8470.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4270.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)70.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4250.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)42.9 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8435.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT

The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success \[Eradication and Presumed eradication\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate30.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate35.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate35.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate66.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate31.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate4.8 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate9.5 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate36.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate27.3 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate40.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate40.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate35.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate29.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate70.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate27.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate27.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate53.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate45.5 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate45.5 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate81.8 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate13.3 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate14.3 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate13.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT

The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success \[Eradication,Presumed eradication\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4246.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8444.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8450.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)66.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4266.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)42.9 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4250.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8421.4 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)28.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4228.6 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8425.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4225.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8420.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)66.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8464.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4269.2 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)78.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4283.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)66.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8442.9 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8480.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4270.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)76.9 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8425.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4250.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)50.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4218.2 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)25.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8433.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT

The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success \[Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\], \[Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\]; and \[Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate30.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate15.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate66.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate16.7 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate4.8 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate10.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate20.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate6.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate25.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate50.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate16.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate28.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate21.4 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate33.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate10.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate10.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 42- Success Rate7.1 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate7.7 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOTDay 84 - Success Rate14.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT

The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success \[≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to \< 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to \< 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)\]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

Time frame: Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4235.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)35.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8440.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8450.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)50.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired]Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4275.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)30.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4240.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8425.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)22.2 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 420 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Refractory)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8411.1 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4240.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8440.0 percentage of participants
mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant)Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)20.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8440.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4246.7 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Filamentous FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)33.3 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4220.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)40.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Mould Species OnlyCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8420.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 8437.0 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4232.1 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Dimorphic FungiCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)55.6 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 840 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 429.1 percentage of participants
mITT- Other Non-Candida YeastCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)10.0 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 4228.6 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTEnd of Treatment (EOT)14.3 percentage of participants
mITT-Other Mixed InfectionCrude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOTDay 847.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety - Overall Number of TEAEs

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: From the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drug

Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) consists of all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug as this was a non-comparative open-label study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsStudy Drug-Related TEAEs60 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsTEAEs139 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsSerious TEAEs89 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsStudy Drug-Related Serious TEAEs13 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsTEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Stud19 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsStudy Drug TEAEs Leading to Perm Discontinuation7 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsTEAEs Leading to Death44 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsStudy Drug-Related TEAEs Leading to Death1 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsDeaths47 participants
mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired]Safety - Overall Number of TEAEsDeaths Through 28 Days after Last Dose Study Drug42 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026