Skip to content

Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation With the McGrath Series 5 Video Laryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope

Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation With the McGrath Series 5 Video Laryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00633867
Enrollment
120
Registered
2008-03-12
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2011-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tracheal Intubation

Keywords

Tracheal intubation, Laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscope, McGrath, success, time

Brief summary

The simplicity of use and intuitive function of the McGrath video-laryngoscope suggests it may have a bigger role than as a back-up to conventional direct laryngoscopy and could possibly be the first-line laryngoscope for situations where difficult intubations are more likely or more hazardous. The incidence of difficult or failed intubation for an individual anaesthetist is related to their experience, decreasing as experience increases. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the McGrath laryngoscope when used by relatively inexperienced anaesthetists, who are those most likely to encounter difficulties. The null hypotheses to be tested is that there is no difference between the Macintosh and McGrath laryngoscope in terms of ease and success in intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEMcGrath

Tracheal intubation, using Mcgrath video-laryngoscope

DEVICETracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope

Tracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope

Sponsors

NHS Grampian
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (18 years and over) scheduled for elective surgery whose anaesthetic plan would normally include oral intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope blade after induction of general anaesthesia and who have given valid informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients requiring special techniques for intubation such as rapid sequence induction * Adults who have learning difficulties * Are unconscious or very severely ill * Have a terminal illness; are in an emergency situation * Have a mental illness * Have dementia * Prisoners * Those who could be considered to have a particularly dependent relationship with the investigator and other vulnerable groups.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation TimeAt intubationTime from anaesthetist picking up laryngoscope until 1st upward capnograph deflection after intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of View of the Vocal CordsAt analysis
Number of Attempts to Secure Successful IntubationAt analysisIs there a difference in the number of attempts required to secure successful intubation ?
Incidence of Initial Oesophageal IntubationAt analysis
Difference in Learning to Use the ScopesAt analysisIs there a difference between trainee anaesthetists in learning to use the scopes
Incidence of Low Arterial Saturation During IntubationAt analysis
Incidence of Visible Trauma to the AirwayAt analysis
Number of Intubations Taking More Than 70 SecondsAt Analysis

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

adult patients undergoing elective tracheal intubation at induction of anaesthesia Between February and August 2008

Pre-assignment details

139 patients consented for study. 120 assigned to groups. 19 not studied: no McGrath® scope available (n=10). No direct supervision of intubator (n=6). Case cancellation or changes (n=3).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
McGrath
Tracheal Intubation using McGrath video-laryngoscope
60
Macintosh
Tracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope
60
Total120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMcGrathMacintoshTotal
Age, Customized48 Years60.5 Years54 Years
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
60 participants60 participants120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants41 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 600 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Intubation Time

Time from anaesthetist picking up laryngoscope until 1st upward capnograph deflection after intubation

Time frame: At intubation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
McGrathIntubation Time47.0 seconds
MacintoshIntubation Time29.5 seconds
p-value: <0.01Log Rank
Secondary

Difference in Learning to Use the Scopes

Is there a difference between trainee anaesthetists in learning to use the scopes

Time frame: At analysis

Secondary

Incidence of Initial Oesophageal Intubation

Time frame: At analysis

Secondary

Incidence of Low Arterial Saturation During Intubation

Time frame: At analysis

Secondary

Incidence of Visible Trauma to the Airway

Time frame: At analysis

Secondary

Number of Attempts to Secure Successful Intubation

Is there a difference in the number of attempts required to secure successful intubation ?

Time frame: At analysis

Secondary

Number of Intubations Taking More Than 70 Seconds

Time frame: At Analysis

Secondary

Quality of View of the Vocal Cords

Time frame: At analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026