Skip to content

Ziprasidone Augmentation of SSRIs for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) That do Not Sufficiently Respond to Treatment With SSRIs

A Three-phase Study Designed to Test the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of the Combination of Ziprasidone With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) That do Not Sufficiently Respond to Treatment With SSRIs.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00633399
Enrollment
458
Registered
2008-03-12
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder, Major Depression, Depression, Geodon, Ziprasidone, SSRI Augmentation, Treatment Resistant Depression

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if adding the study drug, ziprasidone, to an antidepressant medication helps improve symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). We are studying the drug's effectiveness in treating depression, as well as its safety when it is added to another drug. Hypothesis A: There will be a difference in the percentage of responders in the two treatment conditions during phase 2; response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group.

Detailed description

The proposed study involves three phases. The first phase is an 8-week, open-label trial of an SSRI for MDD. Patients who do not experience sufficient symptom improvement following this open-label trial will be enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of ziprasidone augmentation (second phase). Ziprasidone and placebo-remitters will then enter a 12-month, double-blind extension phase (third phase). We estimate that approximately 400 patients will enter phase 1 of the study so that a minimum of 180 subjects will enter double-blind treatment (phase 2) over 5 years. Each treatment arm during phase 2 will have 90 subjects. Hypothesis B1: During phase 2, there will be a difference between the two groups in the percentage of responders (50% or greater reduction in symptom severity) with regards to anxious symptoms of MDD as measured by the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group. Hypothesis B2: During phase 2, there will be a difference between the two groups in the percentage of responders (50% or greater reduction in symptom severity) with regards to painful symptoms of MDD, as measured by the overall visual analogue pain (VAS-pain) scale scores; response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group. Hypothesis C: The time to relapse during phase 3 will be shorter among adjunctive placebo- than ziprasidone-remitters.

Interventions

DRUGZiprasidone

20mg-80mg a day. Dose increases of 20mg per day may occur at three study visits as directed by clinician. Maximum; 80mg per day per patient.

DRUGPlacebo

0mg Placebo per day (1-4 tablets per day). Dose increases and dose decreases may occur, but patient will remain at 0mg placebo.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent. * Men or women, 18-65 years of age. * MDD, current, according to DSM-IV criteria and as diagnosed by the SCID- I/P during the screen and baseline visit of phase 1. * A HAM-D-17 score \> 14 during the screen and baseline visit of phase 1.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine * Device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy). * Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician. * Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease or uncontrolled seizure disorder. * History of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to the study drug. * The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past). * Patients requiring excluded medications (see appendix 1 for details). * Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features. * Prior course of ziprasidone, or intolerance to ziprasidone at any dose. * Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months. * Have failed more than 3 adequate antidepressant trials during the current MDE. Some examples of adequate dosage of an antidepressant trial include either \> 150 mg of imipramine (or its tricyclic equivalent), \> 60 mg of phenelzine (or its monoamine oxidase inhibitor equivalent), \> 20 mg of fluoxetine (or its SSRI-equivalent), \> 150mg of bupropion, \> 300mg of trazodone (or nefazodone), \>75 mg of venlafaxine, \>60mg of duloxetine, or \> 15mg of mirtazapine. A trial of adequate duration was defined as one during which the patient was on any given antidepressant at an adequate dose for a minimum of 6 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary Outcome Measure Will be Response Rates (50% Decrease in HAM-D-17 Scores) During Phase 28 WeeksThe primary outcome measure will be response rates (50% decrease in HAM-D-17 scores) during phase 2. A responder will be a patient who experiences a 50% or greater decrease in symptoms according to the HAM-D-17 during phase 2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Remission Rates (HAM-D 17 Scores of Less Than 8) After Treatment Phase 2.8 weeksA secondary outcome measure will be remission rates (HAM-D 17 scores of less than 8) after treatment phase 2.. A remitted will be a patient with a final score of 7 or less on the HAMD-17 during phase 2.
Comparing Scores on HAM-D 17 Baseline Visit to Phase 2 Final Visit at Week 88 weeksThis will involve looking at the change in HAM-D 17 scores during phase 2. For HAMD-17 the minimum is 0, the maximum is 52, and greater scores represent more symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

458 patients met eligibility criteria for the study and were enrolled in an 8-week, open-label, flexible dose trial of escitalopram. At the end of this open-label trial, 139 patients not responding to Escitalopram were randomized to receive adjunctive ziprasidone or adjunctive placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ziprasidone + Escitalopram
Patients in group 1 will receive Ziprasidone added to Escitalopram for the full 8 weeks of Phase 2. Ziprasidone: 20mg-80mg a day. Dose increases of 20mg per day may occur at three study visits as directed by clinician. Maximum; 80mg per day per patient.
71
Placebo + Escitalopram
Patients in group 2 will receive Placebo added to Escitalopram for the full 8 weeks of Phase 2. Placebo: 0mg Placebo per day (1-4 tablets per day). Dose increases and dose decreases may occur, but patient will remain at 0mg placebo.
68
Total139

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZiprasidone + EscitalopramPlacebo + EscitalopramTotal
Age, Continuous44.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
44.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
44.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants68 participants139 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants19 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 7142 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 710 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Outcome Measure Will be Response Rates (50% Decrease in HAM-D-17 Scores) During Phase 2

The primary outcome measure will be response rates (50% decrease in HAM-D-17 scores) during phase 2. A responder will be a patient who experiences a 50% or greater decrease in symptoms according to the HAM-D-17 during phase 2.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ziprasidone + EscitalopramThe Primary Outcome Measure Will be Response Rates (50% Decrease in HAM-D-17 Scores) During Phase 235.2 Percentage of patients
Placebo + EscitalopramThe Primary Outcome Measure Will be Response Rates (50% Decrease in HAM-D-17 Scores) During Phase 220.5 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Comparing Scores on HAM-D 17 Baseline Visit to Phase 2 Final Visit at Week 8

This will involve looking at the change in HAM-D 17 scores during phase 2. For HAMD-17 the minimum is 0, the maximum is 52, and greater scores represent more symptoms.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ziprasidone + EscitalopramComparing Scores on HAM-D 17 Baseline Visit to Phase 2 Final Visit at Week 8-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo + EscitalopramComparing Scores on HAM-D 17 Baseline Visit to Phase 2 Final Visit at Week 8-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Secondary

Remission Rates (HAM-D 17 Scores of Less Than 8) After Treatment Phase 2.

A secondary outcome measure will be remission rates (HAM-D 17 scores of less than 8) after treatment phase 2.. A remitted will be a patient with a final score of 7 or less on the HAMD-17 during phase 2.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ziprasidone + EscitalopramRemission Rates (HAM-D 17 Scores of Less Than 8) After Treatment Phase 2.38 Percentage of patients
Placebo + EscitalopramRemission Rates (HAM-D 17 Scores of Less Than 8) After Treatment Phase 2.30 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026