Skip to content

EPIC :Anal Incontinence After Delivery. Secondary Prevention With Caesarean Section.

Anal Incontinence After Delivery. Secondary Prevention With Caesarean Section.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00632567
Acronym
EPIC
Enrollment
554
Registered
2008-03-10
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

Anal incontinence, First delivery was traumatic, No anal incontinence

Brief summary

Anal incontinence is frequent and treatment is difficult. One of the most important reasons is traumatic delivery. 10 % of women develop anal incontinence after first delivery. This incidence is higher after second vaginal delivery, particularly if the first delivery caused break in the anal sphincter. One possibility to avoid anal incontinence is the caesarean section. So, do the investigators have to recommend caesarean section for second delivery if the first was traumatic? But caesarean section had a morbidity. Actually, the choice between the delivery modalities is very subjective.

Detailed description

Anal incontinence is frequent and treatment is difficult. One of the most important reasons is traumatic delivery. 10 % of women develop anal incontinence after first delivery. This incidence is higher after second vaginal delivery, particularly if the first delivery caused break in the anal sphincter. One possibility to avoid anal incontinence is the caesarean section. So, do the investigators have to recommend caesarean section for second delivery if the first was traumatic? But caesarean section had a morbidity. Actually, the choice between the delivery modalities is very subjective. It seems to be very useful to compare, in randomized controlled study, global morbidity of caesarean section and vaginal delivery for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography. In start of study, all women were included, for randomisation (section cesarean prophylactic versus vaginal delivery) if an anal sphincter rupture is diagnosed with anal endosonography before second delivery. . Currently, in case of refusal randomisation, women are proposed to participate to the ancillary study (cohort study). The primary endpoint is comparison of median incontinence score of VAISEY in the two arms after 6 months. The secondary endpoints are urinary incontinence, quality of life and global morbidity between the two arms after second delivery. The investigators estimated, needing 123 women in each arm. Hospital investigators are: BICHAT Claude Bernard (Pr LUTON), Armand Trousseau (Pr BENIFLA), Jean VERDIER (Pr CARBILLON), BEAUJON (Pr LUTON), Louis MOURIER (Pr MANDELBROT), Versailles (Dr PANEL). Inclusion will be for 6 years and 9 months. Women will be included during the last trimester and evaluation will be perform on 8 weeks, 6 and 12 month after delivery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcaesarean section

caesarean section for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography.

PROCEDUREvaginal delivery

vaginal delivery for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* More than 18 years old * Having health insurance * Second pregnancy * Inclusion in the third trimester * First delivery was traumatic * No anal incontinence * Accept to participate, sign the informed consent * Prior medical examination

Exclusion criteria

* Monitoring impossible * Woman who have an anal operation * Caesarean section * First delivery with anal break stage 4 * Indication of a scheduled caesarean section not for proctologic reason * Patient physically, mentally or legally incompetent to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is comparison of median incontinence score of VAIZEY in the two arms after 6 months.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incontinence scores in the two arms after 6/8 weeks and 6 month, transitional anal incontinence after delivery urinary incontinence 6 and 12 month after the delivery, sexual score(IFSI)global morbidity between the two arms after anal endoscopy6 month and 12 month

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026