Skip to content

Q-CPR Compression Sensor Size Qualification in Children

Feasibility of CPR Adjuncts in Children: Q-CPR Compression Sensor Size Qualification

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00630773
Acronym
PUCK
Enrollment
150
Registered
2008-03-07
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2008-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CPR

Keywords

CPR, compression sensor, chest compression adjuncts

Brief summary

This prospective, pilot observational study will be performed in the Emergency Department (ED), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Operating Room (OR) and regular inpatient care area (RIPCA) settings at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The differences in trained pediatric health care provider placement of the compression sensor and their assessment of the suitability / willingness to use the current or size modified sensor will be assessed.

Detailed description

Context: Expert recommendations for CPR skills (blowing air into the lungs, pressing on the chest) are poorly followed by health care providers. CPR sensors as small as a hockey puck placed on the chest during CPR delivery are able to coach a rescuer to perform better CPR through corrective voice feedback. More adults survive when the quality of CPR (Q-CPR) is improved. This new technology is currently not approved for use in children, specifically 6 months to \< 8 years of age. Objectives: 1. Characterize trained pediatric health care provider opinion concerning how appropriate the current Q-CPR sensor (puck), FDA approved for children ≥ 8 years of age, is for use in younger children ages 6m to \< 8 years of age. 2. Determine the need for Q-CPR sensor (puck) size changes to improve its suitability for younger children \< 8 years of age, based upon trained pediatric health care provider opinion. 3. Characterize the amount of Q-CPR sensor (puck) overlap with standard large and small mock defibrillator electrode pads placed in usual locations on the chest. 4. Evaluate trained pediatric health care provider self-reported willingness to use current or modified Q-CPR sensors (pucks) in younger children, 6 months to \< 8 years of age. Study Design/Setting/Participants: This observational study will be performed in the Emergency Department (ED), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Operating Room (OR) and regular inpatient care area (RIPCA) settings at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Parents and guardians of children ages 6m to \< 8 years of age receiving routine clinical care in these patient care areas will be approached for inclusion. Health care practitioners (HCPs) in the ED, OR and PICU will also be approached for inclusion. Study Measures: Children will have their age, length, weight, and simple measurements of their chest, neck and abdomen taken. The differences in trained pediatric health care provider placement of the compression sensor and their assessment of the suitability / willingness to use the current or size modified sensor will be assessed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Laerdal Medical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria - child subjects 1. Children aged 6 months to 8 years receiving care in the ED, OR, PICU, or RIPCA 2. Parental or guardian permission (verbal consent), and if appropriate, child assent. * Inclusion Criteria - HCPs 1. Physician, nurse, therapist, or technician involved in patient care in the hospital area (ED, OR, PICU, RIPCA) where a consented child subject is located 2. Verbal consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* child subjects 1. Obvious chest deformity (pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum) that would make chest dimension measurements difficult or inaccurate. 2. Absence of child assent as evidenced by either vocal or physical objection to performing measurements. * HCPs 1. Previous enrollment in the study for a child subject in the same age strata as the subject enrolled at that time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Determination of how appropriate the existing compression sensor is on children aged 6m to 8yrs, based upon trained pediatric health care provider opinion.1 year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026