Kidney Failure, Chronic
Conditions
Keywords
Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus (Prograf), Pharmacokinetics, Sublingual administration, Drug interactions (Cytochrome P450 and p-glycoprotein)
Brief summary
Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route may allow for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine.
Detailed description
Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. The amount of oral tacrolimus that is absorbed varies in all patient populations studied. Tacrolimus is metabolized or broken down for elimination by the liver and small intestine via cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, CYP 3A5, and p-glycoprotein enzyme systems. Enzyme activity is affected by several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an individuals genetic make-up and differences in expression may contribute to variations in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. There are number of drug-drug interactions where concomitantly administered medications can increase or decrease this break down of tacrolimus. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Studies in lung transplant recipients have utilized sublingual (under the tongue) tacrolimus administration with successful outcomes. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route allows for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine. In order to learn more about the possible role of sublingual tacrolimus among transplant recipients we will administer tacrolimus sublingually. In addition, we will evaluate differences in expression and bioactivity of SNP polymorphisms and their effects in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Patients awaiting kidney transplantation who are listed on the kidney transplant waiting list or those with upcoming living donor transplants at our center will be administered five doses of sublingual tacrolimus followed by five doses of oral tacrolimus. We will evaluate and then compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sublingual and oral tacrolimus administration among the study participants. The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of tacrolimus after sublingual and oral administration. A secondary objective is to assess the drug-drug interaction between concomitant therapy with clotrimazole.
Interventions
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients awaiting kidney transplantation aged ≥ 18 years
Exclusion criteria
* Patients concurrently treated with medications that interact with tacrolimus (other than clotrimazole)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| C0 (ng/mL) | Day 3 and Day 8, time 0 (before tacrolimus dose) | Trough concentration |
| Cmax | Day 3 and Day 8, at time of maximum concentration | Maximum concentration (ng/mL) |
| Tmax | Day 3 and Day 8, time of maximum concentration | Time to Maximum concentration (hours) |
| Estimated AUC 0-6 | Day 3 and Day 8, calculated based on concentrations measured between hours 0 and 6 | Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L) |
| Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time | Day 3, minutes to powder dissolution | Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Interactions and Genotypes | 2 weeks | Impact of drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche vs. nystatin suspension. Evaluate genotype polymorphisms that influence CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and p-glycoprotein expression to determine impact on sublingual and oral tacrolimus delivery. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) Sublingual (SL) tacrolimus 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight \< 90 kg) or 3 mg every 12 hours (subject weight \> 90kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral (PO) tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Nystatin suspension 5 mL every 12 hours (study days 1 - 3 and 6 - 8). | 2 |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) Sublingual (SL) tacrolimus 1 mg every 12 hours (subject weight \< 90 kg) or 2 mg every 12 hours (subject weight \> 90 kg) (study day 1 - 3). Tacrolimus capsules will be opened and the contents placed under the participants tongue. Oral (PO) tacrolimus at same dose every 12 hours (study day 6 - 8). Tacrolimus capsules will be administered by mouth. Clotrimazole troche 10 mg every 12 hours (study day 1 - 3 and 6 - 8). | 3 |
| Total | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 2 | 0 / 3 |
Outcome results
C0 (ng/mL)
Trough concentration
Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, time 0 (before tacrolimus dose)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | C0 (ng/mL) | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 1.45 ng/mL |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | C0 (ng/mL) | Day 8 (Oral) | 1.25 ng/mL |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | C0 (ng/mL) | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 6.2 ng/mL |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | C0 (ng/mL) | Day 8 (Oral) | 6.5 ng/mL |
Cmax
Maximum concentration (ng/mL)
Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, at time of maximum concentration
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Cmax | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 9.6 ng/mL |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Cmax | Day 8 (Oral) | 4.6 ng/mL |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Cmax | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 14.0 ng/mL |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Cmax | Day 8 (Oral) | 19.5 ng/mL |
Estimated AUC 0-6
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L)
Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, calculated based on concentrations measured between hours 0 and 6
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 5 Sublingual (day 3) | 63.0 mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 3 Oral (day 8) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 4 Sublingual (day 3) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 4 Oral (day 8) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 3 Sublingual (day 3) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 1 Sublingual (day 3) | 9.3 mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 1 Oral (day 8) | 4.9 mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 2 Sublingual (day 3) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 2 Oral (day 8) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 5 Oral (day 8) | 23.2 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 2 Sublingual (day 3) | 27.2 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 5 Sublingual (day 3) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 3 Sublingual (day 3) | 66.0 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 1 Sublingual (day 3) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 3 Oral (day 8) | 76.0 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 5 Oral (day 8) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 4 Sublingual (day 3) | 63.7 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 1 Oral (day 8) | NA mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 4 Oral (day 8) | 52.5 mg-hr/L |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Estimated AUC 0-6 | Patient 2 Oral (day 8) | 32.4 mg-hr/L |
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time
Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes)
Time frame: Day 3, minutes to powder dissolution
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time | 2.25 minutes |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time | 2.0 minutes |
Tmax
Time to Maximum concentration (hours)
Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, time of maximum concentration
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Tmax | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 1.75 hours |
| Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin) | Tmax | Day 8 (Oral) | 0.875 hours |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Tmax | Day 3 (Sublingual) | 3.0 hours |
| Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole) | Tmax | Day 8 (Oral) | 2.0 hours |
Drug Interactions and Genotypes
Impact of drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche vs. nystatin suspension. Evaluate genotype polymorphisms that influence CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and p-glycoprotein expression to determine impact on sublingual and oral tacrolimus delivery.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: We were unable to assess genotype polymorphisms due to the small number of subjects enrolled in the study.