Skip to content

An Eval of Neurocognitive Function, Oxidative Damage, and Their Association With Outcomes in METH and Cocaine Abusers.

An Evaluation of Neurocognitive Function, Oxidative Damage, and Their Association With Treatment Outcomes in Methamphetamine and Cocaine Abusers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00628927
Enrollment
217
Registered
2008-03-05
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2015-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stimulant Dependence

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether performance on neurocognitive measures predicts treatment outcomes in individuals with substance abuse disorders. A second purpose is to compare the risk of damage, as well as actual damage, to DNA and other cell parts in people with substance abuse disorders to that of people who do not have substance abuse disorders.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to replicate the finding that performance on the Stroop color-word interference task is predictive of treatment completion in participants with cocaine use disorders and to extend this finding to participants with Methamphetamine use disorders. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether: 1. performance on various neurocognitive measures, including the Stroop, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Iowa Gambling Task (GT), Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale version -11 (BIS-11), and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) is predictive of treatment attrition and stimulant use outcomes in METH/cocaine abusers; 2. neurocognitive test performance is associated with oxidative damage, a severe consequence of oxidative stress, in METH/cocaine abusers; 3. oxidative damage is predictive of treatment attrition and substance use outcomes in METH/cocaine abusers, 4. oxidative damage in METH/cocaine abusers is significantly greater than that of a normal comparison group and 5. exploratory analyses reveal a significant relationship among oxidative stress, neurocognitive function, and treatment outcomes in METH/cocaine abusers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(METH and/or Cocaine Dependent Group): * be randomized into the CTN-0031 (STAGE-12) trial * current abuse or dependence for METH and/or cocaine * endorse METH and/or cocaine as the primary drug of choice * able to correctly distinguish the colored stimuli on the Stoop task.

Exclusion criteria

(METH and/or Cocaine Dependent Group): * history of stroke * history of a seizure disorder Inclusion Criteria (Non-METH and/or Cocaine Dependent Group): * be 18 years of age or older * be able to understand the study and provide written informed consent in English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroop Color-word TaskSingle study visitThe primary objective of this study was to replicate the finding that performance on the Stroop color-word interference task is predictive of treatment completion in participants with cocaine use disorders (Streeter et al., 2007) and to extend this finding to participants with methamphetamine use disorders. In the Stroop, the participant is required to name the color of the ink in which a word is printed while inhibiting the overlearned response of reading the word (e.g., the word ''red'' might be printed in blue ink). The number of errors were subtracted from the time required (RT; Reaction Time) for each of the 3 trials, yielding three summary scores. The derived interference score is obtained by subtracting the RT for the first trial from the RT for the third trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Barrett Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11)Single study visitThe BIS-11 consists of 30 self-report items, with responses in a four-point Likert-type scale (0 - 3)ranging from Rarely/Never to Almost Always/Always and comprises three domains: Attentional impulsiveness (AI), Motor impulsiveness (MI), and Non-planning impulsiveness (NP); these three domains are summed to yield a total score; higher scores reflect greater impulsivity. The total score was utilized as the BIS-11 predictor measure (possible score range 0 - 90).
Tail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative DamageSingle study visitThe test for oxidative damage was derived from a blood sample which was analyzed for tail length from the comet assay; higher scores reflect greater oxidative damage.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

As an ancillary study to CTN-0031, six of the nine sites participating in CTN-0031 were chosen to participate in the present study. At the participating sites, participants who were randomized into CTN-0031 were eligible to be screened for the present study. Normal controls were recruited via advertising from one study site.

Pre-assignment details

6 stimulant abusers met at least one exclusion criterion, 3 for a history of stroke and 3 for a history of seizures. 2 of those 6 were incorrectly enrolled into the study. The most common exclusion criteria met by the normal control screeners was having a DSM-IV substance use diagnosis and positive urine toxicology screen.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Simulant Dependent Participants
Stimulant Dependent pts entering treatment who are also enrolled in CTN0031
183
Normal Control Participants
Normal Control participants recruited from the community
30
Total213

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyEquipment failure10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProblems performing blood draw60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNormal Control ParticipantsSimulant Dependent ParticipantsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants183 Participants213 Participants
Age, Continuous44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants183 participants213 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants125 Participants142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants58 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1750 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1750 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Stroop Color-word Task

The primary objective of this study was to replicate the finding that performance on the Stroop color-word interference task is predictive of treatment completion in participants with cocaine use disorders (Streeter et al., 2007) and to extend this finding to participants with methamphetamine use disorders. In the Stroop, the participant is required to name the color of the ink in which a word is printed while inhibiting the overlearned response of reading the word (e.g., the word ''red'' might be printed in blue ink). The number of errors were subtracted from the time required (RT; Reaction Time) for each of the 3 trials, yielding three summary scores. The derived interference score is obtained by subtracting the RT for the first trial from the RT for the third trial.

Time frame: Single study visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stimulant Dependent CompletersStroop Color-word Task55.4 secondsStandard Deviation 22.9
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-CompletersStroop Color-word Task50.5 secondsStandard Deviation 21
Secondary

Barrett Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11)

The BIS-11 consists of 30 self-report items, with responses in a four-point Likert-type scale (0 - 3)ranging from Rarely/Never to Almost Always/Always and comprises three domains: Attentional impulsiveness (AI), Motor impulsiveness (MI), and Non-planning impulsiveness (NP); these three domains are summed to yield a total score; higher scores reflect greater impulsivity. The total score was utilized as the BIS-11 predictor measure (possible score range 0 - 90).

Time frame: Single study visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stimulant Dependent CompletersBarrett Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11)66.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-CompletersBarrett Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11)69.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Secondary

Tail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative Damage

The test for oxidative damage was derived from a blood sample which was analyzed for tail length from the comet assay; higher scores reflect greater oxidative damage.

Time frame: Single study visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stimulant Dependent CompletersTail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative Damage17.3 µmStandard Deviation 10.1
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-CompletersTail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative Damage15.6 µmStandard Deviation 8.5
Normal ControlsTail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative Damage16.5 µmStandard Deviation 7.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026