Skip to content

Feasibility of Ventilation Detection Via Standard Defibrillator Pads in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients

Feasibility of Ventilation Detection Using Thoracic Impedence Acquired Via Standard Defibrillator Electrode Pads in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00628875
Acronym
Vent Detection
Enrollment
28
Registered
2008-03-05
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2010-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiration, Artificial

Keywords

mechanical ventilation, thoracic impedence, defibrillator pads, ventilation detection, pediatric ventilation

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, observational case series of a convenience sample of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients in the Pediatric ICU, Progressive Care Unit and Operating Room at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. We propose to observe, measure and report the accuracy, precision and bias of defibrillator electrode pads to detect breathing in stable but critically ill and mechanically ventilated children. This study will provide preliminary data to inform the resuscitation research community and assist development of evidence-based pediatric resuscitation guidelines in the future.

Detailed description

Context: Resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend target values for rate and depth of rescue breathing and chest compressions. Defibrillator electrode pads can accurately detect the size, rate, and speed of machine-generated breaths in adults. The accuracy, precision, bias, and ability of the defibrillator electrode pads to detect the size, rate and speed of breathing in children have not been studied. Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy, precision, bias and ability of the pads and defibrillator to detect the rate and depth of breathing in critically ill children on breathing machines. Important secondary objectives include reporting the accuracy, precision and bias of the measurement of the speed of the breath, measurement variability, and impact of alternative defibrillator electrode pad location on the chest. Study Design/Setting/Participants: Prospective, pilot, observational study in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Progressive Care Unit at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The participants are all patients in the PICU and Progressive Care Unit (PCU), 6 months to 17 years, who are supported by their clinical management team with a tracheal tube, standard breathing machine, and standard ICU monitoring systems. Intervention: Standard defibrillator electrode pads will be placed on the patient's chest in two typical pediatric configurations, and data will be recorded for 5 minutes in each configuration. These defibrillator electrode pads will be used exclusively for monitoring, as additions to the standard ICU monitoring. Study Measures: The primary outcome variable will be the successful detection of breathing rate. We will compare the accuracy, precision and bias of detection of each breath of \> 2 ml/kg by the defibrillator electrode pads compared with the gold standard mechanical ventilator pneumotachometer detected breaths. Secondary outcome variables will include defibrillator electrode pad detection of breathing depth and speed compared to standard ICU monitors (considered the gold standard). We will also study the effect of defibrillator electrode pad location on the accuracy, precision, bias and ability to detect breathing rate, depth, and speed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Laerdal Medical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients age 6 months - 17 years with: 2. Artificial airway 3. Mechanical ventilation (PCV or VCV) 4. Hemodynamic stability to participate in the study, as determined by the clinical treatment team. 5. Parental/guardian permission (informed consent) and if appropriate, child assent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with chest tubes 2. High frequency ventilation (Jet or Oscillation) 3. Airway Pressure Release ventilation 4. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 5. Significant chest wall abnormality (e.g. Vertebral Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) or device precluding typical placement of defibrillator electrode pads) 6. Altered skin integrity in areas where defibrillator electrode pads would be placed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This is a pilot study to gather preliminary data. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of defibrillator pad detection of breaths >2ml/kg, compared to the gold standard pneumotachometer detection of breaths.1 year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026