Transthyretin Amyloidosis, Transthyretin Gene Mutations
Conditions
Keywords
TRANSTHYRETIN, AMYLOIDOSIS, TRANSTHYRETIN AMYLOIDOSIS, Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy
Brief summary
THAOS is a global, multi-center, longitudinal observational survey open to all patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), including ATTR-PN (polyneuropathy), ATTR-CM (cardiomyopathy) and wild-type ATTR-CM. It is open-ended with a minimum duration of 10 years. Patients will be followed as long as they are able to participate. The principal aims of this outcome survey are to better understand and characterize the natural history of the disease by studying a large and heterogenous patient population. Survey data may be used to develop new treatment guidelines and recommendations, and to inform and educate clinicians about the management of this disease.
Detailed description
n/a NA
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion into THAOS: 1. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the participant (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. 2. Males and females greater than or equal to 18 years of age. 3. Confirmed genotyped TTR mutation with or without a diagnosis of hereditary or wild-type ATTR amyloidosis. Confirmation of ATTRwt amyloidosis will be determined by genotyped confirmation that patient does not possess a known mutation in TTR gene (ie, is a carrier of wild-type allele only) via genetic testing and one of the following set of criteria (a, b, or c): 1. Presence of amyloid in cardiac biopsy tissue confirmed as TTR amyloid by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry; or 2. Evidence of cardiac involvement by echocardiogram as defined by left ventricle wall thickness of \>12 mm, and presence of amyloid in non-cardiac tissue confirmed as TTR amyloid by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry; or 3. Evidence of cardiac involvement by echocardiogram as defined by left ventricle wall thickness of \>12 mm, and presence of amyloid in cardiac tissue indirectly confirmed by scintigraphy with a bone seeking tracer eg, 99mTC-DPD \[99mTC-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propano-dicarboxylic acid\], 99mTC- PYP \[Pyrophosphate\], and 99mTC-HMDP \[hydroxymethylene diphosphonate\] with Perugini grade greater than or equal to 2.
Exclusion criteria
Patients meeting any of the following will not be included in the study: 1\. Patient has evidence of primary (light chain) or secondary amyloidosis.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years) | A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to the administered medicinal product in a participant who received study drug. Treatment emergent AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. A treatment-related SAE was a treatment-related AE and was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Causality was assessed by the investigator. |
| Number of All-Cause Deaths | From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years) | Number of deaths due to any cause was analyzed as time from enrollment or first treatment of tafamidis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Heart Failure at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Heart failure, also known as congestive heart failure is a cardiovascular event. |
| Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | New York Health Association (NYHA) functional classification included: Class I (no limitation in physical activity, no dyspnea with normal activity), Class II (slight limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea with ordinary physical activity), Class III (marked limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea with less than ordinary physical activity) and Class IV (cannot perform a physical activity without any symptoms, dyspnea at rest). |
| Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Participants diagnosed with Transthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTR) at baseline with assessed category of yes, no, and unknown. |
| Number of Participants With Prior Misdiagnosis at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Number of participants with ATTR and participants who had prior misdiagnosis at the baseline were reported. |
| Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Genetic mutation leads to misfolding of protein transthyretin (TTR) which results in ATTR. In this outcome, number of participants with ATTRv mutation type and wild type TTR were reported. |
| Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Number of participants had previous or current participant in any clinical trials at the baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Number of participants being allowed for the use of Tafamidis when under strict conditions, Tafamidis was in development and made available to groups of participants who have a disease with no satisfactory authorised therapies and who cannot enter clinical trials. |
| Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Number of participants whether with family history of symptomatic ATTR amyloidosis at Baseline were reported. |
| Number of Affected Generations at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | The mean of affected generations in participants with a known family history was reported. |
| Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) assessed motor, sensory and reflex activity specifically in the lower limbs and combined total scores for the lower limbs were collected and reported. Derived NIS LL score extends from 0 (normal functions) to a maximum possible value of 88 points, the scale is additive for all deficits and is applied bilaterally for each modality tested: 1) muscle strength: 0 (normal)-4 (paralysis), higher score = more weakness; 2) sensory and 3) reflex testings: 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Reflex score: 0 (normal)-10 (present), higher score =present in more anatomic sites; Motor score: 0-160 (full range of motion with maximum resistance across all anatomical sites), higher score=more impairment. Sensory Score has a range of 0 to the normal value of 124 where ratings are coded as 0=absent; 1=decreased; 2=normal. |
| Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) is a score that categorizes participants into six stages (0, I,II, IIIa, IIIb, IV) based on mobility status. 0 = No sensory disturbances in the feet and able to walk without difficulty; I=Sensory disturbances in the feet but able to walk without difficulty; II=Some difficulties with walking but can walk without aid; IIIa=Able to walk with 1 stick or crutch; IIIb=Able to walk with 2 sticks or crutches; IV=Not ambulatory, confined to a wheelchair or bedridden. Higher stage indicates lower mobility status. |
| Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels \[gram/liter (g/L)\]. mBMI was measured as kg/m\^2\*g/L. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity. |
| Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | BP (Blood Pressure) is the pressure of the blood within the arteries. It is produced primarily by the contraction of the heart muscle. BP measurement is recorded by 2 numbers: systolic BP (SBP, BP when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle) and diastolic BP (DBP, BP when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles). Available sitting SBP and DBP at Baseline were reported. |
| Left Ventricular (LV) Septum Thickness at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Cardiac amyloidosis is attributable to intramyocardial amyloid infiltration, which leads to a progressive increase of ventricular wall thickness and stiffness. A left ventricular (LV) wall thickness ≥12 mm plus at least one red flag should raise the suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis. |
| Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Left ventricular dysfunction, a condition in which the left ventricle of the heart exhibits a decreased functionality, was assessed based on systolic ejection fraction. Systolic ejection fraction was the fraction of the end-diastolic volume (EDV) that was ejected out of left ventricle with each contraction. |
| Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L): Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Overall Health Score at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | EQ-5D-3L VAS: participant rated questionnaire to assess generic health status in two parts: single utility score and visual analog scale. The VAS component rated the current health state on a scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicating a better health state. |
| EQ-5D-3L: VAS Derived Index at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | The EQ-5D-3L VAS derived index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value. This corresponds to the best possible health status, the scale of the Derived Index is 0 \[death\] to 1 \[perfect health\]. EQ-5D-3L VAS overall health score and derived score data were sourced from different part of the EQ-5D questionnaire and are conceptually different from each other as EQ VAS is a 0-100 scale and EQ-5D index is a value attached to an EQ-5D profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, participant's preferences about how good or bad the state is. More data were collected for EQ-5D index score compared to EQ VAS overall health score at the baseline. |
| Norfolk Total Quality of Life (QoL) Score at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Norfolk QOL: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of neuropathy on the quality of life of participants diagnosed with ATTR. Scoring was based on 35 questions that yield a TQOL as well as 5 subscale scores: activities of daily living, large fiber neuropathy/physical functioning, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, and symptoms. TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Following parameters were analyzed: heart rate, PR interval, QT interval, QRS interval and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Abnormal findings in ECG were based on investigator's discretion. |
| Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Number of participants with atrial fibrillation/flutter (rapid, irregular heart rhythm), implanted artificial cardiac pacemaker, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (detects and stops irregular heartbeats, also called arrhythmias) were reported. |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2). |
| Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Coutinho disease stages is the most common classification used to capture ATTR (Transthyretin Amyloidosis) disease progression. Participants with stage 0 disease are asymptomatic, Participants with stage 1 (mild) disease are ambulatory, Participants with stage 2 (moderate) disease are ambulatory but require assistance and/or have involvement of the upper limbs, and Participants with stage 3 (severe) disease are bedridden or wheelchair-bound. |
| Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) | Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants are classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 10 level score which ranges between 10 (moribund) to 100 (normal, no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. |
Countries
Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Arab Emirates, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcome Survey) was a non-interventional, longitudinal observational survey opened to all participants with ATTR (Transthyretin Amyloidosis), including both inherited and wild-type forms of disease and those with TTR gene mutations without disease diagnosis. There was no planned enroll number. THAOS did not involve the administration of an intervention. Participants continued to receive their previous medications and all other standard care for their disease.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated All available data from participants who received Tafamidis 20 mg throughout the study. | 1,648 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall All available data from participants who received Tafamidis 61/80 mg (Tafamidis 61mg/tafamidis meglumine 80 mg) throughout the study. | 662 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall All available data from participants who received Tafamidis 20 mg but switched to 61/80 mg during the study. | 196 |
| Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall All available data from participants who received any other dose of Tafamidis throughout the study. | 15 |
| Tafamidis Untreated All available data from participants who had been enrolled in THAOS, signed the informed consent and who had not received tafamidis during the THAOS study. | 4,197 |
| Total | 6,718 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 197 | 81 | 12 | 4 | 939 |
| Overall Study | Does not meet inclusion criteria | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| Overall Study | Duplicate participant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 109 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 498 |
| Overall Study | Missing | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Othe reasons | 987 | 373 | 105 | 1 | 1,772 |
| Overall Study | Participant moved out of the area, but did not transfer to another THAOS site | 37 | 29 | 46 | 0 | 91 |
| Overall Study | Participant transferred to another THAOS site | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Participation in an interventional clinical trial | 81 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 63 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 30 |
| Overall Study | Site closure | 152 | 146 | 6 | 8 | 691 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 63 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 69 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tafamidis 20 mg Treated | Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall | Tafamidis Untreated | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.75 | 76.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.65 | 77.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 | 77.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.33 | 57.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.08 | 58.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.31 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Afro-Caribbean | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 22 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Hispanic | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 16 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 110 Participants | 12 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 170 Participants | 295 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 11 Participants | 53 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 225 Participants | 294 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 600 Participants | 512 Participants | 46 Participants | 12 Participants | 2271 Participants | 3441 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Latino American | 42 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 138 Participants | 182 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 859 Participants | 77 Participants | 143 Participants | 0 Participants | 1242 Participants | 2321 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 18 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 113 Participants | 132 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 734 Participants | 62 Participants | 33 Participants | 4 Participants | 1581 Participants | 2414 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 914 Participants | 600 Participants | 163 Participants | 11 Participants | 2616 Participants | 4304 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 197 / 1,648 | 81 / 662 | 12 / 196 | 4 / 15 | 939 / 4,197 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 94 / 1,648 | 3 / 662 | 0 / 196 | 1 / 15 | 0 / 4,197 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 333 / 1,648 | 138 / 662 | 41 / 196 | 3 / 15 | 4 / 4,197 |
Outcome results
Number of All-Cause Deaths
Number of deaths due to any cause was analyzed as time from enrollment or first treatment of tafamidis.
Time frame: From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years)
Population: Tafamidis treated set included participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as participants who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently initiated tafamidis treatment during the study. Tafamidis untreated set included participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as participants who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently initiated tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of All-Cause Deaths | 158 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of All-Cause Deaths | 1038 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.
Time frame: From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years)
Population: TEAEs and SAEs were summarised for only Tafamidis treated set: all available data from participants who have been enrolled in THAOS, signed the informed consent and were on tafamidis treatment on or prior to the date of enrollment of THAOS, or subsequently initiated tafamidis treatment after the enrollment of THAOS.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Adverse Events | 621 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 331 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 138 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Adverse Events | 175 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Adverse Events | 66 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 41 Participants |
| Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Adverse Events | 4 Participants |
| Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs
A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to the administered medicinal product in a participant who received study drug. Treatment emergent AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. A treatment-related SAE was a treatment-related AE and was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Causality was assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: From the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1) to the end of data collection (Up to 14.4 years)
Population: Treatment emergent treatment related AEs and SAEs were summarised for only tafamidis treated set: all available data from participants who have been enrolled in THAOS, signed the informed consent and were on tafamidis treatment on or prior to the date of enrollment of THAOS, or subsequently initiated tafamidis treatment after the enrollment of THAOS.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Adverse Events | 47 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 28 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 5 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Adverse Events | 11 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Adverse Events | 1 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Adverse Events | 2 Participants |
| Tafamidis Other Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs | Participants with Serious Adverse Events | 1 Participants |
Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2).
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline | 26.3 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 17.93 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline | 26.5 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 24.14 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline | 25.9 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 11.12 |
Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline
Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) assessed motor, sensory and reflex activity specifically in the lower limbs and combined total scores for the lower limbs were collected and reported. Derived NIS LL score extends from 0 (normal functions) to a maximum possible value of 88 points, the scale is additive for all deficits and is applied bilaterally for each modality tested: 1) muscle strength: 0 (normal)-4 (paralysis), higher score = more weakness; 2) sensory and 3) reflex testings: 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Reflex score: 0 (normal)-10 (present), higher score =present in more anatomic sites; Motor score: 0-160 (full range of motion with maximum resistance across all anatomical sites), higher score=more impairment. Sensory Score has a range of 0 to the normal value of 124 where ratings are coded as 0=absent; 1=decreased; 2=normal.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Derived NIS-LL Score | 14.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.73 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Reflex Score | 8.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.05 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Motor Score | 152.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.11 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Sensory Score | 108.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.83 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Sensory Score | 97.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.79 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Derived NIS-LL Score | 20.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.17 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Motor Score | 150.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.98 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Reflex Score | 7.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Sensory Score | 109.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.19 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Reflex Score | 8.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Motor Score | 152.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.41 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Derived Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Baseline | Derived NIS-LL Score | 12.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.14 |
EQ-5D-3L: VAS Derived Index at Baseline
The EQ-5D-3L VAS derived index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value. This corresponds to the best possible health status, the scale of the Derived Index is 0 \[death\] to 1 \[perfect health\]. EQ-5D-3L VAS overall health score and derived score data were sourced from different part of the EQ-5D questionnaire and are conceptually different from each other as EQ VAS is a 0-100 scale and EQ-5D index is a value attached to an EQ-5D profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, participant's preferences about how good or bad the state is. More data were collected for EQ-5D index score compared to EQ VAS overall health score at the baseline.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | EQ-5D-3L: VAS Derived Index at Baseline | 0.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | EQ-5D-3L: VAS Derived Index at Baseline | 0.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | EQ-5D-3L: VAS Derived Index at Baseline | 0.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L): Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Overall Health Score at Baseline
EQ-5D-3L VAS: participant rated questionnaire to assess generic health status in two parts: single utility score and visual analog scale. The VAS component rated the current health state on a scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicating a better health state.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L): Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Overall Health Score at Baseline | 71.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L): Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Overall Health Score at Baseline | 70.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.01 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L): Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Overall Health Score at Baseline | 71.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.98 |
Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction at Baseline
Left ventricular dysfunction, a condition in which the left ventricle of the heart exhibits a decreased functionality, was assessed based on systolic ejection fraction. Systolic ejection fraction was the fraction of the end-diastolic volume (EDV) that was ejected out of left ventricle with each contraction.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction at Baseline | 53.6 Percentage | Standard Deviation 13.46 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction at Baseline | 54.3 Percentage | Standard Deviation 12.61 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction at Baseline | 53.5 Percentage | Standard Deviation 13.77 |
Left Ventricular (LV) Septum Thickness at Baseline
Cardiac amyloidosis is attributable to intramyocardial amyloid infiltration, which leads to a progressive increase of ventricular wall thickness and stiffness. A left ventricular (LV) wall thickness ≥12 mm plus at least one red flag should raise the suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Septum Thickness at Baseline | 15.2 mm | Standard Deviation 5.27 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Septum Thickness at Baseline | 15.3 mm | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Left Ventricular (LV) Septum Thickness at Baseline | 15.2 mm | Standard Deviation 5.52 |
Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Baseline
mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels \[gram/liter (g/L)\]. mBMI was measured as kg/m\^2\*g/L. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Baseline | 1078 (kg/m^2)*(g/L) | Standard Deviation 240.9 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Baseline | 1063.1 (kg/m^2)*(g/L) | Standard Deviation 228.8 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Baseline | 1083.3 (kg/m^2)*(g/L) | Standard Deviation 242.4 |
Norfolk Total Quality of Life (QoL) Score at Baseline
Norfolk QOL: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of neuropathy on the quality of life of participants diagnosed with ATTR. Scoring was based on 35 questions that yield a TQOL as well as 5 subscale scores: activities of daily living, large fiber neuropathy/physical functioning, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, and symptoms. TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Norfolk Total Quality of Life (QoL) Score at Baseline | 24.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Norfolk Total Quality of Life (QoL) Score at Baseline | 25.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Norfolk Total Quality of Life (QoL) Score at Baseline | 23.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
Number of Affected Generations at Baseline
The mean of affected generations in participants with a known family history was reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Affected Generations at Baseline | 1.5 Generation | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Affected Generations at Baseline | 1.5 Generation | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Affected Generations at Baseline | 1.5 Generation | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline
Participants diagnosed with Transthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTR) at baseline with assessed category of yes, no, and unknown.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | No | 1234 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 4773 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 28 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | No | 36 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 2368 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 4 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 3794 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 25 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants Diagnosed With ATTR at Baseline | No | 1227 Participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline
Following parameters were analyzed: heart rate, PR interval, QT interval, QRS interval and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Abnormal findings in ECG were based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline | 2911 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline | 1226 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline | 2315 Participants |
Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline
Number of participants with atrial fibrillation/flutter (rapid, irregular heart rhythm), implanted artificial cardiac pacemaker, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (detects and stops irregular heartbeats, also called arrhythmias) were reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set: All available data from enrolled participants in THAOS study. Tafamidis treated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS that were on tafamidis at and prior to the enrollment; participant not on tafamidis at the enrollment subsequently initiated treatment. Tafamidis untreated set: All available data from participants enrolled in THAOS and did not receive tafamidis during the study, including those initiated receiving tafamidis post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | ICD Implanted | 127 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Pacemaker Implanted | 364 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter | 667 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Pacemaker Implanted | 167 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter | 290 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | ICD Implanted | 62 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter | 501 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | ICD Implanted | 99 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Pacemaker Implanted, and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) at Baseline | Pacemaker Implanted | 266 Participants |
Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline
Genetic mutation leads to misfolding of protein transthyretin (TTR) which results in ATTR. In this outcome, number of participants with ATTRv mutation type and wild type TTR were reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | ATTRv mutation | 4950 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | Wild type | 1768 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | ATTRv mutation | 1743 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | Wild type | 778 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | ATTRv mutation | 4365 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With ATTR Genotypes at Baseline | Wild type | 1321 Participants |
Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline
Coutinho disease stages is the most common classification used to capture ATTR (Transthyretin Amyloidosis) disease progression. Participants with stage 0 disease are asymptomatic, Participants with stage 1 (mild) disease are ambulatory, Participants with stage 2 (moderate) disease are ambulatory but require assistance and/or have involvement of the upper limbs, and Participants with stage 3 (severe) disease are bedridden or wheelchair-bound.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 0 | 1860 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 1 | 2134 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 2 | 362 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 3 | 78 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 3 | 16 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 0 | 512 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 2 | 121 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 1 | 1040 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 3 | 67 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 1 | 1721 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 2 | 266 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Coutinho Disease Stages at Baseline | Stage 0 | 1731 Participants |
Number of Participants With Heart Failure at Baseline
Heart failure, also known as congestive heart failure is a cardiovascular event.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Heart Failure at Baseline | 2717 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Heart Failure at Baseline | 1125 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Heart Failure at Baseline | 2245 Participants |
Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline
Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants are classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 10 level score which ranges between 10 (moribund) to 100 (normal, no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 10 | 2 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 20 | 6 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 30 | 6 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 40 | 82 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 50 | 140 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 60 | 271 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 70 | 492 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 80 | 944 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 90 | 1127 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 100 | 1694 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 90 | 633 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 10 | 1 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 60 | 92 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 50 | 31 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 20 | 0 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 100 | 484 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 80 | 436 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 30 | 3 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 70 | 200 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 40 | 15 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 80 | 728 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 40 | 71 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 50 | 121 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 60 | 209 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 90 | 890 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 70 | 375 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 10 | 2 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 100 | 1593 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 20 | 6 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Index at Baseline | 30 | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline
Number of participants whether with family history of symptomatic ATTR amyloidosis at Baseline were reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 3874 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | No | 2243 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 559 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 1365 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | No | 873 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 275 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | No | 1792 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Unknown | 375 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Known Family History of Symptomatic ATTR at Baseline | Yes | 3485 Participants |
Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline
Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) is a score that categorizes participants into six stages (0, I,II, IIIa, IIIb, IV) based on mobility status. 0 = No sensory disturbances in the feet and able to walk without difficulty; I=Sensory disturbances in the feet but able to walk without difficulty; II=Some difficulties with walking but can walk without aid; IIIa=Able to walk with 1 stick or crutch; IIIb=Able to walk with 2 sticks or crutches; IV=Not ambulatory, confined to a wheelchair or bedridden. Higher stage indicates lower mobility status.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | 0 | 1860 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | I | 1642 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | II | 492 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIa | 226 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIb | 136 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IV | 78 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IV | 16 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | 0 | 512 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIa | 84 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIb | 37 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | I | 785 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | II | 255 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | I | 1372 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | II | 349 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IV | 67 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIa | 160 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | 0 | 1731 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Modified Polyneuropathy Disability (mPND) Scores at Baseline | IIIb | 106 Participants |
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline
New York Health Association (NYHA) functional classification included: Class I (no limitation in physical activity, no dyspnea with normal activity), Class II (slight limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea with ordinary physical activity), Class III (marked limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea with less than ordinary physical activity) and Class IV (cannot perform a physical activity without any symptoms, dyspnea at rest).
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | I | 304 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | II | 1341 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | III | 664 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | IV | 71 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | IV | 10 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | I | 133 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | III | 222 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | II | 557 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | IV | 67 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | II | 1088 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | III | 556 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications at Baseline | I | 252 Participants |
Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline
Number of participants had previous or current participant in any clinical trials at the baseline.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | Yes | 853 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | No | 4417 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | Yes | 473 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | No | 1676 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | Yes | 669 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Clinical Trial Participation at Baseline | No | 3604 Participants |
Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline
Number of participants being allowed for the use of Tafamidis when under strict conditions, Tafamidis was in development and made available to groups of participants who have a disease with no satisfactory authorised therapies and who cannot enter clinical trials.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | Yes | 85 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | No | 3182 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | Yes | 80 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | No | 1410 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | Yes | 38 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Past or Current Tafamidis Compassionate Use/Early Access or Other Non-commercial Program at Baseline | No | 2423 Participants |
Number of Participants With Prior Misdiagnosis at Baseline
Number of participants with ATTR and participants who had prior misdiagnosis at the baseline were reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall analysis set:all enrolled participants in THAOS study.Tafamidis treated set:participants who were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment, as well as those who were not on tafamidis at enrollment but subsequently received tafamidis during the study.Tafamidis untreated set:participants who were enrolled and never received tafamidis throughout the study, as well as those who were not on tafamidis before or at enrollment but subsequently started tafamidis treatment during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Prior Misdiagnosis at Baseline | 616 Participants |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Prior Misdiagnosis at Baseline | 283 Participants |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Number of Participants With Prior Misdiagnosis at Baseline | 493 Participants |
Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline
BP (Blood Pressure) is the pressure of the blood within the arteries. It is produced primarily by the contraction of the heart muscle. BP measurement is recorded by 2 numbers: systolic BP (SBP, BP when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle) and diastolic BP (DBP, BP when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles). Available sitting SBP and DBP at Baseline were reported.
Time frame: At the start of data collection at Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Overall:all available data from enrolled participants.Tafamidis treated:available data from enrolled participants that were on tafamidis at or prior to the enrollment,and those not on tafamidis at the enrollment but later initiated tafamidis.Tafamidis untreated:available data from enrolled participants and did not receive tafamidis throughout and those not on tafamidis prior or at enrollment but later initiated tafamidis.Number analyzed=participants with available BP data collected at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Systolic BP (mmHg) | 123.7 mmHg | Standard Deviation 18.67 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 75.3 mmHg | Standard Deviation 11.69 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Systolic BP (mmHg) | 125.3 mmHg | Standard Deviation 18.78 |
| Tafamidis 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 75.6 mmHg | Standard Deviation 11.56 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Systolic BP (mmHg) | 122.9 mmHg | Standard Deviation 18.15 |
| Tafamidis 20 mg to 61/80 mg Treated-Overall | Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (SBP and DBP) at Baseline | Sitting Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 75.1 mmHg | Standard Deviation 11.58 |