Skip to content

Evaluation of Long-Term Sequelae After Thrombophlebitis, i.e. Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities

Deep Venous Thrombosis. Long-Term Results After Treatment With Either Low-Molecular -Weight Heparin or Unfractionated Heparin. Examinations of the Venous System.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00628576
Enrollment
99
Registered
2008-03-05
Start date
1993-10-31
Completion date
2004-06-30
Last updated
2008-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Venous Thrombosis

Keywords

Deep Venous Thrombosis, lower extremities, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Postthrombotic Syndrome, Heparins, Low-molecular- weight heparin, Tinzaparin

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of the new acute treatment of deep venous thrombosis by use of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with standard treatment using unfractionated heparin, especially concerning long-term morbidity.

Detailed description

Deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) remains a common clinical problem (annual incidence 0.10-0.16%) and long-term morbidity as chronic venous insufficience (CVI) in 10-30%. As to recurrent DVT, initial treatment with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin ( to-day's terminology Fractionated Heparin (FH)) and Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) has shown equal efficiency, whereas the efficacy concerning long-term morbidity has only more recently been published. This study was initiated to compare the efficacy of UFH and FH concerning the incidence of CVI after symptomatic DVT at short-term and long-term follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGunfractionated heparin

UFH: Continuous i.v. infusion 100 IU/kg/4hrs initially and then adjusted to maintain APTT value 1.5 - 2.5 the pre-treatment value

FH (Tinzaparin): 175 iu/kg s.c. in the abdomen once daily

Sponsors

Aalborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First DVT with or without known risk factors except overt cancer * Second DVT more than two years after the first if the patient was without clinical signs of CVI.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to anticoagulation therapy * Candidate to thrombectomy with arterious-venous fistula or thrombolytic therapy * Known cancer at the time of the DVT diagnosis * Patients unable to cooperate for anticoagulation therapy or manage the tests.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical evaluation of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) - (Postthrombotic Syndrome) based on internationally accepted criteria.Two years and 6 to 10 years

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026