Skip to content

Treating Cognition in Schizophrenia With Atomoxetine and Cognitive Remediation

Cognitive Treatments in Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00628394
Enrollment
119
Registered
2008-03-05
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2020-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognition in Schizophrenia

Keywords

Cognition, schizophrenia, Atomoxetine, Strattera, cognitive remediation

Brief summary

This research is being done because people with schizophrenia often have problems with thinking including learning, remembering, paying attention, and problem solving. During this study, we will test if cognitive remediation (computer games made to improve thinking), used along with a drug called atomoxetine, may help the problems in thinking as well as some of the symptoms of schizophrenia.

Detailed description

Persons with schizophrenia in a stable and residual antipsychotic- treated clinical condition for at least 8 weeks will be recruited from several public mental health treatment settings into the UTSW Schizophrenia Research Clinic. Each volunteer will receive information about the protocol and its risks and benefits. If they give their informed consent after a full opportunity to learn about the details of the study, they will be allowed to proceed. All recruits will have been treated with optimal dosing of any 2nd generation antipsychotic drug (APD-2) and will have been clinically stable with respect to psychotic symptoms for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization, and on a stable dose of the medication for at least 2 weeks. All eligible volunteers will receive a routine medical assessment and psychiatric diagnostic work-up including the SCID and a consensus diagnosis by two experienced clinicians based on all available data, prior to the randomization. Just prior to randomization, the following sets of assessments will be performed: (1) Medical: Physical Examination, Clinical Chemistries, EKG, urinalysis, weight, and vital signs; (2) Symptomatic: general psychiatric symptom assessment, including the scores on the PANSS, Psychosis Change Scale, and CGI; (3) Cognitive: standard neuropsychometric test battery and surrogate psychosocial tests; all of the assessment batteries will be repeated at the end of the 12-week treatment period, and repeated again at the end of the three month follow-up period (at 6 months from study start). Clinical symptom scales, weight, and vital signs will be repeated at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 , and 24 during the study. The schizophrenia volunteers will be randomized into four treatment groups: (1) atomoxetine plus cognitive remediation; (2) atomoxetine plus remediation control; (3) placebo plus cognitive remediation; and (4) placebo plus remediation control. Atomoxetine or matching placebo will be administered at a dose of 40mg bid (80mg/day) or the placebo equivalent. The remediation sequence will last for 60 minutes and will be administered three times weekly; the remediation control will be administered on the same schedule and for the same duration. Because the volunteers attend the clinic so regularly, we will have an opportunity to track their progress, monitor medication adherence, and optimize study participation. Then, each volunteer will be followed up while taking their blinded study medications, but without any more remediation/control sessions, for the next 3 months. Psychiatric rating scales will be completed the following times, relative to the blinded randomization: baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 months, whereas the neuropsychological battery will be completed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGAtomoxetine

40mg 2po qam

DRUGPlacebo

40mg 2po qam

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Stanley Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. * Males and females. * Ages 18-60 years old. * All races and ethnicities.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of an organic brain disease. * Diagnosis of DSM-IV alcohol or substance abuse within the last month or DSM-IV alcohol or substance dependence within the last 3 months. * Meet criteria for primary negative symptoms, established by clinical judgment. * Current or past history of clozapine treatment for antipsychotic non-response. * Patients hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital within the previous 30 days. * Patients with an unstable medical condition, as determined by the Investigator * Colorblindness * Concurrent treatment with electroconvulsive therapy or psychotherapy. * Pregnant women. * Must be able to read, speak, and understand English. * We do not have the resources necessary to properly study non-English speaking patients in this study. The computer software used for cognitive remediation and some clinical assessments are only available in English. The need to provide such resources in foreign languages would be prohibitive to the successful completion of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropsychological Measures for MATRICS12 weeksGordon Continuous Performance Test - Distractibility Version The test is designed assess a person's executive functioning by testing their ability to maintain their focus over a period of time. They are intended to respond to a series of targets or inhibit their responses to a variety of foils. They are mainly assessed for their omissions and commissions. The omission and commission errors assess the person's ability to screen out extraneous stimuli while responding correctly and inhibiting incorrect responding. This means lower scores are better. The scale is 0-126.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Outcomes12 weeksBirchwood Social Function Scale (SFS) This scale is given to determine a person's ability to function independently and in social settings without difficulty. It assesses a variety of settings with independent subscales (whose scores vary in range) but in which the higher score is always better. These subscales (Withdrawal/Social Engagement; Interpersonal Communication; Independence-Performance; Independence-Competence; Recreation; Prosocial; and, Employment/Occupation) are combined and developed into a mean score. These scores range from 0-32.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Some participants were never randomized due to Screening labs, illicit substances (repeatedly - exclusion), transportation issues, or simply being lost to follow-up. Lost to f/u were contacted 3 times and sent a letter in order to bring them back into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atomox/CR
Patients are given the drug Atomoxetine and Cognitive Remediation training. Atomoxetine: 40mg 2po qam
10
Atomox/Control
Patients are given the drug Atomoxetine and Remediation Control training. Atomoxetine: 40mg 2po qam
9
Placebo/CR
Patients are given a Placebo and Cognitive Remediation training. Placebo: 40mg 2po qam
11
Placebo/Control
Patients are given Placebo and Remediation Control training. Placebo: 40mg 2po qam
10
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtomox/CRAtomox/ControlPlacebo/CRPlacebo/ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants9 Participants11 Participants10 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants9 Participants11 Participants9 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants7 Participants4 Participants5 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants9 participants11 participants10 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants7 Participants8 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 102 / 90 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 90 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Neuropsychological Measures for MATRICS

Gordon Continuous Performance Test - Distractibility Version The test is designed assess a person's executive functioning by testing their ability to maintain their focus over a period of time. They are intended to respond to a series of targets or inhibit their responses to a variety of foils. They are mainly assessed for their omissions and commissions. The omission and commission errors assess the person's ability to screen out extraneous stimuli while responding correctly and inhibiting incorrect responding. This means lower scores are better. The scale is 0-126.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atomox/CRNeuropsychological Measures for MATRICS20.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Atomox/ControlNeuropsychological Measures for MATRICS18.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Placebo/CRNeuropsychological Measures for MATRICS25.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Placebo/ControlNeuropsychological Measures for MATRICS11.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Clinical Outcomes

Birchwood Social Function Scale (SFS) This scale is given to determine a person's ability to function independently and in social settings without difficulty. It assesses a variety of settings with independent subscales (whose scores vary in range) but in which the higher score is always better. These subscales (Withdrawal/Social Engagement; Interpersonal Communication; Independence-Performance; Independence-Competence; Recreation; Prosocial; and, Employment/Occupation) are combined and developed into a mean score. These scores range from 0-32.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atomox/CRClinical Outcomes9.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Atomox/ControlClinical Outcomes10.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Placebo/CRClinical Outcomes10.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Placebo/ControlClinical Outcomes9.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026