Skip to content

NOURISH: Nourishing Our Understanding of Role Modeling to Improve Support and Health

Parent Skills Training to Enhance Weight Loss in Overweight Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00628030
Acronym
NOURISH
Enrollment
184
Registered
2008-03-04
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2015-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Obesity

Keywords

Behavioral intervention, Obesity prevention

Brief summary

The percentage of overweight children between the ages of 6 and 11 has nearly tripled in the last three decades, and rates are even higher among African Americans.Overweight children are at-risk for numerous health problems, thus effective treatments are urgently needed. This study will evaluate an innovative intervention for ethnically diverse parents (NOURISH), which focuses on helping parents role model and teach their children healthy behaviors.

Detailed description

Pediatric overweight is a national public health concern. The percentage of overweight children in the U.S. between the ages of 6 and 11 has nearly tripled in the last 3 decades. African American children are particularly at risk. Pediatric overweight is associated with numerous physical and psychological health problems. Moreover, overweight children are at significant risk for obesity in adulthood. Thus, a focus on pediatric overweight is an important step in the prevention of adult obesity. Despite the urgent need for pediatric overweight interventions, outcomes of some of the most rigorous treatments are, at best, mixed. Although research has found that including parents in interventions for pediatric overweight has positive effects on outcomes, parental involvement is usually limited. Moreover, relatively few studies have included sufficient numbers of lower-SES, African American participants, a group at increased risk for pediatric overweight and associated complications. This study will evaluate the efficacy of an intensive intervention targeting ethnically diverse parents of overweight, children ages 6-11 (NOURISH-Nourishing Our Understanding of Role Modeling to Improve Support and Health).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNOURISH

Participants in the NOURISH intervention will have 6 weekly face-to-face parent group sessions regarding healthy eating and physical activity.

Participants in the Wellness Group will have one face-to-face group meeting and information regarding healthy eating and physical activity will be provided on a regular basis via mail.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To qualify for participation, parents/caregivers must have a child between the ages of 6 and 11 with a BMI \> the 85th percentile \[128\]. * This child must also primarily reside in the participating caregiver's home. * Participants also need to speak English fluently, and be able to understand and follow basic instructions and perform simple exercises.

Exclusion criteria

* Caregivers are ineligible if they are: 1. non-ambulatory, 2. pregnant, 3. or have a clinical diagnosis that may be negatively impacted by exercise. * Parents whose children have a medical condition or developmental disorder that precludes weight loss using conventional diet and exercise methods are also ineligible for participation. All parents meeting study criteria will be offered participation in the randomized trial comparing NOURISH with a control group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Child BMIBasline, PosttestChildren's height and weight were measured and then plotted on the CDC Growth Charts to obtain BMI%ile for age and gender.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Child FeedingBasline, PosttestThe Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) measured parental approaches to and attitudes about feeding their children and the subscale concern about child's weight is reported below in the table. The subscale score was calculated by averaging the items (subscale score range: 3 to 15, higher scores represent greater risk). To compare groups, change scores were calculated by subtracting post-test values from baseline values (negative scores indicate decline in parental concern from baseline to post-test).
Child Quality of LifeBasline, PosttestPediatric Health-Related Quality of Life (PedsQL4.0) change scores from baseline to posttest We reported the Total Score. The PedsQL4.0 response scale ranges from 0 - 4. The items are reverse-scored for interpretability and higher scores indicate higher quality of life. We used the Total Score, or the mean computed as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales. The current report did not provide subscores.
Parental BMIBaseline, PosttestHeight and weight were measured by trained staff and used to calculate BMI. Change scores of parental BMI from baseline to posttest were calculated to show difference between treatment arms.
Parental Dietary Intake of FatBaseline, PosttestParents completed a 3 day dietary record which was reviewed by a dietitian and analyzed using the Nutrition Data System Software (NDS-R) to calculate parental fat intake. Change scores were calculated by subtracting post-test values from baseline values; thus, a negative score indicates a greater reduction in fat intake at post-testing.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NOURISH
Only parents participated in the weekly intervention. Intervention content was grounded in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT); the influence of social learning on behavioral outcomes (e.g., parent's modeling of healthy behavior) was emphasized. Weekly topics included implementing healthy lifestyle behaviors, authoritarian parenting approaches, and strategies for overcoming barriers to change. Parents received pedometers for themselves and 1 of their children. The first 2 waves and second 2 waves of participants received a 12 and 6 week face-to-face intervention (NOURISH), respectively. A one-hour booster session was available for all intervention participants 2 months after completion of the interventions.
92
Wellness Group
Only parents participated in the placebo control group which involved attending a group session moderated by an independent interventionist. This interventionist was blinded to the Specific Aims and hypotheses of this study. The session addressed the role of diet and exercise in pediatric overweight. In addition, control parents received pedometers (and instructions on their use) for themselves and 1 of their children. Finally, control participants were mailed publicly available brochures on pediatric overweight on 2 occasions during the study. Control participants were also sent one additional packet of information (essentially a review of previous mail outs) 2 months after post-testing.
92
Total184

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Baseline to Post-AssessmentLost to Follow-up2829
Baseline to Post-AssessmentWithdrawal by Subject50
Post to 6 Month Follow-upLost to Follow-up3230

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNOURISHWellness GroupTotal
Age, Continuous
Adult Age
38.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
40.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.81
39.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Age, Continuous
Child Age
8.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
8.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53
8.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
74 Participants73 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 920 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 920 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Child BMI

Children's height and weight were measured and then plotted on the CDC Growth Charts to obtain BMI%ile for age and gender.

Time frame: Basline, Posttest

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NOURISHChild BMIBaseline98.47 percentileStandard Deviation 2.24
NOURISHChild BMIPost-test (12 wks -waves 1-2; 6 weeks-waves 3+)98.19 percentileStandard Deviation 2.73
Wellness GroupChild BMIBaseline97.86 percentileStandard Deviation 2.67
Wellness GroupChild BMIPost-test (12 wks -waves 1-2; 6 weeks-waves 3+)97.86 percentileStandard Deviation 2.61
p-value: 0.008Chi-squared
Secondary

Child Feeding

The Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) measured parental approaches to and attitudes about feeding their children and the subscale concern about child's weight is reported below in the table. The subscale score was calculated by averaging the items (subscale score range: 3 to 15, higher scores represent greater risk). To compare groups, change scores were calculated by subtracting post-test values from baseline values (negative scores indicate decline in parental concern from baseline to post-test).

Time frame: Basline, Posttest

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NOURISHChild Feeding-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Wellness GroupChild Feeding-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
p-value: 0.041Chi-squared
Secondary

Child Quality of Life

Pediatric Health-Related Quality of Life (PedsQL4.0) change scores from baseline to posttest We reported the Total Score. The PedsQL4.0 response scale ranges from 0 - 4. The items are reverse-scored for interpretability and higher scores indicate higher quality of life. We used the Total Score, or the mean computed as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales. The current report did not provide subscores.

Time frame: Basline, Posttest

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NOURISHChild Quality of Life3.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.15
Wellness GroupChild Quality of Life1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.88
p-value: 0.61Chi-squared
Secondary

Parental BMI

Height and weight were measured by trained staff and used to calculate BMI. Change scores of parental BMI from baseline to posttest were calculated to show difference between treatment arms.

Time frame: Baseline, Posttest

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NOURISHParental BMI.42 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.84
Wellness GroupParental BMI-.65 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.96
p-value: 0.13Chi-squared
Secondary

Parental Dietary Intake of Fat

Parents completed a 3 day dietary record which was reviewed by a dietitian and analyzed using the Nutrition Data System Software (NDS-R) to calculate parental fat intake. Change scores were calculated by subtracting post-test values from baseline values; thus, a negative score indicates a greater reduction in fat intake at post-testing.

Time frame: Baseline, Posttest

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NOURISHParental Dietary Intake of Fat-6.15 gramsStandard Deviation 13.66
Wellness GroupParental Dietary Intake of Fat-0.42 gramsStandard Deviation 15.35
p-value: 0.024Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026