Skip to content

Cost-Effectiveness Study in the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

Model Project for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00627900
Acronym
GERSHWIN
Enrollment
958
Registered
2008-03-04
Start date
2003-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2008-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

drug-eluting stents

Brief summary

Since the advent of coronary stents, in-stent restenosis has proven to be the major limitation of interventional cardiology, occurring in as many as 30% of patients. Drug-eluting stents are specifically designed to prevent the problem of in-stent restenosis. They consist of a selective anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, a controlled-release polymer, and a closed-cell stent delivery platform. Upon placement, sirolimus elutes into the vessel wall and stops the process of neointimal hyperplasia, thereby significantly reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis. The study Prevention of Coronary Restenosis examines the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with coronary stenosis. The goal of the study is to examine whether the guideline-supported implantation of SES, despite the higher initial cost, improves the quality and economic outcomes of the treatment of patients with coronary stenosis. Secondarily, the study evaluates patient quality of life, impairment of daily activities, re-intervention rate, as well as an account of the utilisation and benefits of the implemented standardised guidelines. In this prospective, multi-centre, country-wide cohort study, 658 patients undergoing an implantation of a SES for treatment of coronary stenosis were recruited from 35 hospital centres. Their treatment and outcomes will be evaluated over a 3-year period by means of standardised questionnaires. In addition, information obtained from the patients will be confirmed and augmented by telephone interviews with the attending physicians involved in their follow-up care. In order to appraise the effect of the new therapy, a comparison cohort group of 394 patients receiving a BMS was recruited. These patients will be evaluated and observed by the same method as those patients receiving a drug-eluting stent, also over 3 years

Interventions

implantation of a bare metal stent

DEVICECypher-Stent (Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent)

Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent

Sponsors

Techniker Krankenkasse
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* indication for implantation of a coronary stent * de novo lesions \< or = 30 mm in patients with diabetes * de novo lesions 12-30 mm or RVD 2.5-3.00 mm in patients without diabetes

Exclusion criteria

* acute MI * lesion length \>30 mm * in-stent restenosis * distal lesion in RVD \< 2.25 mm * lesion in left main or bypass vessel * contraindication to Clopidogrel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost equivalence of sirolimus-eluting coronary stents versus bare metal stents3,6,12,18,24, 36 months following stent implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
MACE (re-PCI, myocardial infarction, CABG, death)3,6,12,24,36 months after stent implantation

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026