Skip to content

Graded Exposure (GEXP) in Vivo Versus Physiotherapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I)

The Effectivity of Graded Exposure in Vivo Versus Standardized Physiotherapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I) Patients With Pain Related Fear: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00625976
Enrollment
46
Registered
2008-02-29
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2014-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Keywords

Complex regional pain syndrome type I, Graded exposure in vivo, Physiotherapy, Pain-related fear

Brief summary

Background: Research on the treatment of CRPS-I, as described in the Dutch evidence based treatment guidelines (Richtlijn Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I, 2006), mainly showed improvement at the level of pain and coping with pain. Only little improvement in functional restoration was found. Research in other pain populations such al neck- and back-pain patients has shown that pain related fear contributes to the development of functional disability. GEXP in vivo which aims on systematically reducing fear of movement, shows promising results in CRPS-I patients (de Jong et al., 2005). Objective: The objective of the proposed project is to compare the effectivity of GEXP in vivo with that of standardized physiotherapy in CRPS-I patients with pain related fear. Design: The study concerns a single blinded, single center, randomized clinical trial. The treatment will be preceded by two pre-measures. After treatment there will be one post-measurement and 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up measurements. Population: The study population will consist of chronic CRPS-I patients between 18 and 65, with pain related fear (PHODA-LE-score ≥ 35 and PHODA-UE-score ≥ 32). Intervention: The two interventions that will be compared are GEXP in vivo (de Jong et al., 2005) and standardized physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo en Goris (1999). The GEXP in vivo comprises 17 sessions of one hour, the physiotherapy treatment of 34 sessions of 30 minutes. Both treatments will be given over a period of 17 weeks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGraded exposure in vivo

Graded exposure in vivo according to the protocol of de Jong et al. (2005)

BEHAVIORALPhysiotherapy

Physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo and Goris (1999)

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis CRPS-I according to IASP criteria. 2. Pain related (PHODA-LE-score ≥ 35 and PHODA-UE-score ≥ 32) 3. Age between 18 and 65. 4. Rehabilitation treatment has been indicated.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy. 2. Insufficient fluency in Dutch. 3. Generalized pain syndrome. 4. Dystonia. 5. Sympathectomy of the affected extremity. 6. Psychopathology 7. Involvement in a claim regarding the disease. 8. Substance abuse. 9. Symptoms on both upper or both lower extremities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Functional disability measured with: Radboud Skills Questionnaire (RASQ; Oerlemans, Cup et al., 2000), for upper limbs; Walking Ability Questionnaire (WAQ; Perez et al., 2002), for lower limbs2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Body function and structure2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Fear of movement2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Fear of pain2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Catastrophizing Scale2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Physical activity in daily life2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Emotional distress2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Participation2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Emotional involvement2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Coping with pain2 times pre treatment, one time post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026