Skip to content

Sorafenib Long Term Extension Program

Sorafenib Long Term Extension Program

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00625378
Acronym
STEP
Enrollment
206
Registered
2008-02-28
Start date
2007-12-21
Completion date
2021-09-24
Last updated
2022-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Keywords

Cancer, Sorafenib, Extension program

Brief summary

The primary purpose of program was to enable patients, currently receiving sorafenib (Nexavar) in a Bayer/Onyx sponsored clinical trial, to continue sorafenib treatment after their respective study had met its primary endpoint and/or had reached the end as defined in the original protocol. Patients were able to continue treatment until (i) the treating physician felt the patient was no longer benefiting from the treatment or (ii) the treatment becomes commercially available and reimbursed for the respective indication as applicable in the country in which the patient lived and the patient could obtain suitable amounts of drug for treatment through standard mechanisms of commercial availability (ie, there should be no interruption in the patient's treatment schedule when switching to commercially available product) or (iii) the patient could join a Post-Trial-Access Program, another study or can receive sorafenib through any other mechanism (e.g. local access program) in accordance with local legal and compliance rules, with no cost to the patient with respect to sorafenib. An additional objective was the assessment of the safety of Nexavar or Nexavar combination treatment.

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)

At the same dose and schedule as in the participants' original clinical trials

Sponsors

ICON Clinical Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients, who are participating in a previous Bayer/Onyx sponsored study that has reached its endpoint (statistical and regulatory or study end), and who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, expected to continue to have an overall positive benefit/risk from continuing treatment. * Patients who have signed informed consent for this long term extension program. * Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation, including the 30 days period after last study drug dosing. The investigator should advise the patient how to achieve an adequate contraception. * Women of childbearing potential who have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of the first dose of sorafenib in this long term extension program. * Patient is receiving sorafenib (Nexavar) as a monotherapy in their originating protocol. Patients who were being treated with sorafenib (Nexavar) in combination with other chemotherapies in the original study, but continued on single agent sorafenib (Nexavar) after discontinuation of the combination agent will be eligible. * Patient who are receiving concurrent combination with sorafenib (Nexavar) and TACE (transarterial chemoembolization) in their originating study will be eligible. * Patients who are receiving concurrent combination with sorafenib (Nexavar) and capecitabine in their originating Study 12444 (RESILIENCE) will be eligible. * Patients who are receiving concurrent combination with sorafenib (Nexavar) and erlotinib in their originating study 12917 (SEARCH) were eligible. * Patients who have completed the End of Treatment assessments in their originating study. Every effort should be made to conduct the End of Treatment visit such that the patient does not have any interruption of sorafenib dosing.

Exclusion criteria

* Any condition that is unstable or that could jeopardize the safety of the patient (please refer to the Investigator Brochure and product labeling safety sections). * History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure \> New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 2 or uncontrolled hypertension. * Myocardial infarction (MI) within the last 3 months. * Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors . * Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors ( Ta, Tis &T1) or any cancer curatively treated \> 5 years prior to study entry. * Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroid anti-epileptics). * Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results. * Any condition which could jeopardise the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study. Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant: * Concurrent anti-cancer chemotherapy, except transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and capecitabine * Concurrent immunotherapy (including monoclonal antibodies), during or within 30 days prior to start of study drug * Concurrent hormonal therapy, except for bisphosphonates,during or within 30 days prior to start of study drug * Concomitant Rifampicin and St John's Wort (Warfarin may be used only with very close monitoring) * Radiotherapy during study or within 3 weeks of start of study drug. \[Palliative radiotherapy will be allowed\] * Concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 including ketoconazole, itraconazole and ritonavir. Consumption of grapefruit juice should also be avoided.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sorafenib Treatment Duration Within STEPFrom the date of the first sorafenib dose until the date of the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 25 months and max duraton of 153.8 monthsTreatment duration was calculated in days as the date of the last dose of any study treatment minus date of the first dose of any study treatment plus one day.
Number of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From signing the informed consent form (ICF) in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The adverse event did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; was a congenital anomaly or birth defect; was an important medical event. A new treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. A drug-related new TEAE was any new TEAE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator.
Number of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A new treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.
Number of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A new treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. A drug-related new TEAE was a new TEAE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (CTC v3). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. The general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.
Number of Participants With All Adverse EventsFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A drug-related AE was any AE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. All AEs in STEP were the combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs.
Number of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. All AEs in STEP were the combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.
Number of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A drug-related AE was any AE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. All AEs in STEP was a combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.
Number of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathFrom signing the ICF in STEP until completion or discontinuation of the study, with a mean duration of 26 monthsPrimary cause of death included: any cause; progressive disease; toxicity due to study treatment (with at least one AE with outcome death); other (unspecified) or missing cause.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeFrom signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 monthsHematology and blood chemistry values were summarized according to their worst CTCAE grade, where applicable. Hematology and blood chemistry values were graded based on the applicable laboratory threshold values outlined in NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with a specific laboratory value that were not graded are not included in the table. CTCAE grade was set to not graded if the reference ranges or other information necessary to derive grades were unavailable or result had a special character (such as \> or \< ). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.
Number of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsUp to 156 monthsEastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status: 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g. light house work, office work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = Dead

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at multiple centers in 19 countries between 21-Dec-2007 (first participant first visit) and 24-Sep-2021 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 206 participants were transferred from the feeder studies and have signed informed consent for STEP. Of these 206 participants, 2 participants were never treated and 204 participants received the study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sorafenib Monotherapy
Participants received single-agent sorafenib at the same dose and schedule as in their original Clinical Trial.
203
Sorafenib+Erlotinib
Participants received sorafenib and erlotinib combination at the same dose and schedule as in their original Clinical Trial.
1
Total204

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event220
Overall StudyDeath380
Overall StudyDisease progression, recurrence or relapse880
Overall StudyEnd of treatment not available20
Overall StudyInvestigator's judgement (no need to continue treatment)10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up170
Overall StudyMedical decision10
Overall StudyMissing20
Overall StudyMultiple toxicities10
Overall StudyNever treated20
Overall StudyNew cancer10
Overall StudyNon-compliant with study medication30
Overall StudyPTA program20
Overall StudyRecurrent rise in amylase and lipase10
Overall StudySponsor decision10
Overall StudySponsor's decision to stop the trial10
Overall StudySwitch to commercial drug61
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject160

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSorafenib MonotherapySorafenib+ErlotinibTotal
Age, Continuous63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
20.0 years63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
ECOG performance status
ECOG 0
25 Participants1 Participants26 Participants
ECOG performance status
ECOG 1
16 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
ECOG performance status
ECOG 2
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
ECOG performance status
Missing
161 Participants0 Participants161 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
39 Participants1 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese/American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
161 Participants0 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants0 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
140 Participants1 Participants141 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
62 / 2030 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
151 / 2031 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
114 / 2031 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Deaths With Primary Cause of Death

Primary cause of death included: any cause; progressive disease; toxicity due to study treatment (with at least one AE with outcome death); other (unspecified) or missing cause.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until completion or discontinuation of the study, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathProgressive disease34 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathOther21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathToxicity due to study treatment3 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathMissing4 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathAny cause62 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathMissing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathAny cause0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathProgressive disease0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathToxicity due to study treatment0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Deaths With Primary Cause of DeathOther0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE Grade

Hematology and blood chemistry values were summarized according to their worst CTCAE grade, where applicable. Hematology and blood chemistry values were graded based on the applicable laboratory threshold values outlined in NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Participants with a specific laboratory value that were not graded are not included in the table. CTCAE grade was set to not graded if the reference ranges or other information necessary to derive grades were unavailable or result had a special character (such as \> or \< ). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Participants in safety analysis set (SAF) with evaluable data for each evaluated laboratory parameter

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 313 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 32 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeINR - Grade 117 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeINR - Grade 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeINR - Grade 311 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeINR - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 166 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 37 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 139 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 212 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 38 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 132 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 47 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 237 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 320 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 44 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 37 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 41 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 213 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 188 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 219 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 36 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 211 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 328 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeNeutrophils - Grade 119 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeNeutrophils - Grade 27 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeNeutrophils - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeNeutrophils - Grade 42 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 167 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 240 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 48 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 137 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 148 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 27 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 417 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 140 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 212 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 41 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 21 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 11 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 11 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLymphopenia - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 11 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLipase - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 11 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradePlatelets - Grade 41 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeALT - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 11 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeLeukocytes - Grade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAmylase - Grade 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeHemoglobin - Grade 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Values by Worst CTCAE GradeAST - Grade 20 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With All Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A drug-related AE was any AE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. All AEs in STEP were the combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAny AE184 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSerious AE (SAE)114 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to dose modification72 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to study drug discontinuation56 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to death37 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE159 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related SAE26 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to dose modification53 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to study drug discontinuation21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to death2 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to dose modification0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAny AE1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSerious AE (SAE)1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to death0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to dose modification0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related SAE1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to study drug discontinuation0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsSorafenib-related AE leading to study drug discontinuation0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse EventsAE leading to death0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE Grade

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. All AEs in STEP were the combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 381 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 417 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 537 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 31 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 41 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 50 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time Intervals

Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status: 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g. light house work, office work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = Dead

Time frame: Up to 156 months

Population: Participants in safety analysis set (SAF) with evaluable data for the evaluation at each timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 07 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 028 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 111 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12Missing3 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 029 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36Missing1 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 022 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 17 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 31 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 015 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 19 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 51 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 013 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 17 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 09 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 18 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 51 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 010 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 18 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 09 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 51 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 08 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 08 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 07 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 06 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 15 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 05 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 14 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102Missing2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 04 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108Missing1 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 13 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 11 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 12 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 12 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 11 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 11 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 11 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 020 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 125 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 24 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 55 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 51 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 51 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 011 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66Missing1 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 16 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 15 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 14 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 04 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 12 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 12 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 02 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueMissing9 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 31 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 19-24ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 37-42ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 127-132ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 49-54ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 1-6ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 7-12ECOG 01 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 109-114ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 13-18ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 61-66ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 133-138ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 25-30ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 67-72ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 121-126ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 73-78ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 31-36ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 79-84ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 139-144ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsLast available valueMissing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 43-48ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 85-90ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 10 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 115-120ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 91-96ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 00 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 30 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 55-60ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 97-102ECOG 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 145-150ECOG 20 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 103-108Missing0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With ECOG Performance Status by 6-months Time IntervalsMonths 151-156ECOG 00 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE Grade

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A new treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 371 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 537 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 417 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 31 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 41 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 50 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The adverse event did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; was a congenital anomaly or birth defect; was an important medical event. A new treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. A drug-related new TEAE was any new TEAE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: From signing the informed consent form (ICF) in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE166 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious AE (SAE)113 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to study drug discontinuation56 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to death37 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE117 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related SAE25 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to dose modification42 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to study drug discontinuation21 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to death2 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to dose modification64 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to death0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to dose modification0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious AE (SAE)1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to dose modification0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to study drug discontinuation0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AE leading to study drug discontinuation0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE1 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related AE leading to death0 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With New Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Sorafenib-related SAE1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A drug-related AE was any AE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. All AEs in STEP was a combination of AEs ongoing from feeder studies and new TEAEs. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria, Version 3.0 (NCI-CTC v. 3.0). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. Specific conditions and symptoms may have values or descriptive comment for each level, but the general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 52 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 365 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 46 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 40 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related All Adverse Events of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAEGrade 31 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE Grade

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered with a pharmaceutical product. The AE did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A new treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was any AE that had a start date on or after ICF date in STEP and up to 30 days after the last sorafenib dose. A drug-related new TEAE was a new TEAE that had a causal relationship with the study treatment as assessed by the investigator. The intensity or severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (CTC v3). The Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) are a set of criteria for the standardized classification of adverse effects of drugs used in cancer therapy. It uses a range of grades from 1 to 5. The general guideline is: Grade 1 - mild; Grade 2 - moderate; Grade 3 - severe; Grade 4 - life-threatening; Grade 5 - death.

Time frame: From signing the ICF in STEP until 30 days after the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 26 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 349 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 52 Participants
Sorafenib MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 46 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 31 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 50 Participants
Sorafenib+ErlotinibNumber of Participants With Study Drug-related New TEAEs of CTCAE Grades 3 or Higher by Worst CTCAE GradeGrade 40 Participants
Primary

Sorafenib Treatment Duration Within STEP

Treatment duration was calculated in days as the date of the last dose of any study treatment minus date of the first dose of any study treatment plus one day.

Time frame: From the date of the first sorafenib dose until the date of the last sorafenib dose, with a mean duration of 25 months and max duraton of 153.8 months

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib MonotherapySorafenib Treatment Duration Within STEP15.69 Months
Sorafenib+ErlotinibSorafenib Treatment Duration Within STEP40.13 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026