Skip to content

Double-Blind, Multicenter, Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of OMS103HP With Vehicle Irrigation Solution in Subjects Undergoing Meniscectomy

Double-Blind, Multicenter, Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of OMS103HP

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00624845
Acronym
C07-004
Enrollment
200
Registered
2008-02-27
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2011-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Meniscectomy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of OMS103HP for Injection (OMS103HP) compared with vehicle irrigation solution for prevention of pain and pain relief in subjects undergoing meniscectomy. The pain relief is assessed based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores in the immediate 24-hour postoperative period and for seven days postoperatively.

Interventions

Maximum 6 bags of OMS103HP irrigation solution

DRUGVehicle

Maximum of 6 bags of vehicle irrigation solution

Sponsors

Omeros Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject has voluntarily signed informed consent form, including HIPAA Authorization. 2. Subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age. 3. Subject is in good general health with a traumatic or degenerative meniscal cartilage injury (full tear) that occurred at least 14 days prior to the day of arthroscopic surgery. 4. Subject is undergoing unilateral meniscectomy. 5. Subject's physical examination is within normal limits or examination is clinically nonsignificant as determined by the Investigator, and subject is in good general health. 6. Subject's laboratory evaluations are within normal limits or evaluations are clinically nonsignificant as determined by the Investigator. 7. Subject, if female and of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal greater than one year) agrees to use an effective method of birth control for the duration of her study involvement. 8. Subject is at minimal risk from anesthesia and is classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as either PS-1 (a normal healthy patient) or PS-2 (a patient with mild systemic disease that results in no functional limitation). See Appendix VI. 9. Subject agrees to refrain from taking the excluded medications listed in

Exclusion criteria

through postoperative Day 7 (except for authorized analgesic medications) unless written permission has been granted by Omeros. 10. Subject is able to be proficient in the use of the ePRO device (documented at the site).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean VAS at 24 hours postoperatively.24 hours

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026