Skip to content

Developing a Home Telehealth Program to Manage Pressure Ulcers in SCI/D

Developing a Home Telehealth Program to Manage Pressure Ulcers in SCI/D

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00624806
Enrollment
18
Registered
2008-02-27
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

Pressure ulcer, Telemedicine

Brief summary

The Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) is a national leader in using distance technology to monitor patients' self-care via an in-home messaging device with disease management protocols (DMPs). No such DMPs exist for the community dwelling spinal cord injury/disorders (SCI/D) population. Our objective is to develop the tools necessary for implementing a new home telehealth program to manage community-dwelling veterans with SCI/D at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (PrUs).

Detailed description

Background: VHA is a national leader in using distance technology to monitor patients' self-care via an in-home messaging device with disease management protocols (DMPs). No such DMPs exist for the community dwelling spinal cord injury/disorders (SCI/D) population. Our objective is to develop the tools necessary for implementing a new home telehealth program to manage community-dwelling veterans with SCI/D at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (PrUs). Objectives: The goal of the study was to complete activities necessary in preparation for implementing a Home Telehealth program to manage veterans with SCI/D at risk of developing PrUs. Specifically this Rapid Response Project (RRP) included: 1) Convening an expert panel to validate Pressure Ulcer (PrU) PrU DMP items; 2) Developing a standardized protocol that specified how the nurse Care Coordinator who would manage patients who develop open skin wounds across the Hub and Spoke system of care; 3) Assessing individual telehealth DMP items by calling a sample of patients on a daily or weekly basis for up to 2 months to determine their validity and 4) Developing an instrument to assess staff satisfaction with this method of patient management. Methods: A convenience sample of veterans about to be discharged home from the Cleveland SCI/D inpatient unit were asked to participate in the study. This included patients living close to the Hub and those referred from spoke sites. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either daily calls (5 days/week) for 40 total calls, or weekly calls (8 total calls) over the course of the 8 week/2month study intervention period. Status: The project team is conducting ongoing analysis of the data to develop publications.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDaily telephone calls

Patients randomized to this group receive daily phone calls to remind them what they should do to prevent ulcers.

BEHAVIORALWeekly telephone calls

Patients randomized to this group receive weekly phone calls to remind them what they should do to prevent ulcers.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Veterans admitted to Cleveland VA SCI/D unit or treated in the outpatient clinic

Exclusion criteria

* No phone * Cognitive impairment * Hearing impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days of DataEnrollment to study end, 8 weeksData includes the number of triggered items and types of triggers.
Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeEnrollment to study end, 8 weeksMeasured the number of days with triggers that occurred on the Baseline day, during the 8-week intervention, and on the End of Study day.
Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsEnrollment to study end, 8 weeksPercent of participants who triggered Disease-Management Protocol items by group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Daily Group
Daily telephone calls to remind patients of recommended behaviors Daily phone group: Patients randomized to this group receive daily phone calls to remind them what they should do to prevent ulcers.
10
Weekly Group
Weekly telephone calls to remind patients of recommended behaviors Weekly phone group: Patients randomized to this group receive weekly phone calls to remind them what they should do to prevent ulcers.
8
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeekly GroupDaily GroupTotal
Age, Continuous49.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.89
51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.64
50.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.29
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Score
A = Complete
4 participants3 participants7 participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Score
B = Sensory Incomplete
2 participants2 participants4 participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Score
C = Motor Incomplete
1 participants1 participants2 participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Score
D = Motor Incomplete
1 participants1 participants2 participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Score
Unknown
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Amputees
N/A
7 participants9 participants16 participants
Amputees
Right Lower Extremity
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Appropriate Cushion
2 participants7 participants9 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Daily Skin Inspection
4 participants8 participants12 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Good Nutrition
5 participants9 participants14 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Hygiene
5 participants8 participants13 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Keep skin clean and dry
5 participants9 participants14 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
No tight clothing/shoes
5 participants8 participants13 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Other
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Pressure releases/Tilts/Weight shifts
4 participants9 participants13 participants
Baseline Self-Reported Skin Behaviors
Safety in transfers
3 participants7 participants10 participants
Current employment status
Not working
7 participants10 participants17 participants
Current employment status
Small business owner
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Location
Ischium
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Location
N/A
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Location
Other
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Location
Sacrum
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
N/A
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
Stage III = Full thickness
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
Stage I = Intact skin/non-blanchable redness
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
Stage II = Partial thickness
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
Stage IV = Full thickness
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Current Pressure Ulcer Stage
Unknown
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Duration of Injury in years18.81 years17.94 years18.4 years
Education
College graduate
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Education
Graduate school
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Education
High school graduate
2 participants4 participants6 participants
Education
Some college
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Education
Some high school
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Level of Injury
Cervical
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Level of Injury
Lumbar
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Level of Injury
N/A
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Level of Injury
Thoracic
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Marital status
Divorced
3 participants4 participants7 participants
Marital status
Married
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Marital status
Never married
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Marital status
Widowed
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of Current Pressure Ulcers0.5 pressure ulcers1.2 pressure ulcers0.89 pressure ulcers
Number of prior pressure ulcers (PrU)1.7 pressure ulcers2.43 pressure ulcers2 pressure ulcers
Number of Prior Pressure Ulcer Surgeries0.63 surgeries0.6 surgeries0.61 surgeries
Past Work History
Administrator, professional, manager
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Past Work History
Clerical, sales worker
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Past Work History
Never worked
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Past Work History
Other
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Past Work History
Semi-skilled worker
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Past Work History
Skilled manual worker, crafstman
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Past Work History
Unskilled worker
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Prior Ulcer Locations
Coccyx
2 pressure ulcers1 pressure ulcers3 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Heel
1 pressure ulcers1 pressure ulcers2 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Ischium
2 pressure ulcers4 pressure ulcers6 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Lateral Malleolus
1 pressure ulcers0 pressure ulcers1 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Medial Malleolus
1 pressure ulcers0 pressure ulcers1 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Sacrum
3 pressure ulcers1 pressure ulcers4 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Locations
Trochanter
1 pressure ulcers3 pressure ulcers4 pressure ulcers
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
Coccyx
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
Ischium
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
Lateral Malleolus
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
N/A
2 participants5 participants7 participants
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
Sacrum
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Prior Ulcer Surgery Locations
Trochanter
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 participants4 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Receive regular assistance from:
Other Relatives
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Receive regular assistance from:
Paid Attendant
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Receive regular assistance from:
Partner/Significant Other
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Receive regular assistance from:
Spouse
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Residence type
Apartment
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Residence type
House
6 participants8 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Etiology
Diving
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Etiology
Fall
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Etiology
Gunshot wound
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Etiology
Other etiology
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Etiology
Vehicular accident
2 participants5 participants7 participants
Urinary Management
Condom Catheter
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Urinary Management
Intermittent Catheter
6 participants2 participants8 participants
Urinary Management
Other
1 participants5 participants6 participants
Urinary Management
Unknown
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Years Since Employment14.64 years10.43 years12.12 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Days of Data

Data includes the number of triggered items and types of triggers.

Time frame: Enrollment to study end, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm 1Days of Data9 days
Arm 2Days of Data7 days
Primary

Number of Days With Triggers at Certain Timeframe

Measured the number of days with triggers that occurred on the Baseline day, during the 8-week intervention, and on the End of Study day.

Time frame: Enrollment to study end, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeBaseline Day Triggers5 days
Arm 1Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeDays with Triggers during Intervention24 days
Arm 1Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeEnd of Study Day Triggers1 days
Arm 2Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeBaseline Day Triggers6 days
Arm 2Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeDays with Triggers during Intervention24 days
Arm 2Number of Days With Triggers at Certain TimeframeEnd of Study Day Triggers4 days
Primary

Percent of Participant Triggering DMP Items

Percent of participants who triggered Disease-Management Protocol items by group.

Time frame: Enrollment to study end, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsPositioning/Pressure Reliefs/Weight Shifts46.7 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsQuality of CG Care3.3 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsEquipment Issues40 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsFeelings of Depression0 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsSkin Moisture Issues0 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsOngoing Problems Affecting Self-Mgmt6.7 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDaily Skin Inspection23.3 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDragging Across Surfaces3.3 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsExisting Pressure Ulcer Care0 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 1Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDiabetic Comorbidities6.7 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDiabetic Comorbidities2.9 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDaily Skin Inspection23.5 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsEquipment Issues55.9 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsPositioning/Pressure Reliefs/Weight Shifts50 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsSkin Moisture Issues11.8 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsExisting Pressure Ulcer Care17.6 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsQuality of CG Care8.8 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsFeelings of Depression11.8 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsOngoing Problems Affecting Self-Mgmt14.7 % of participants triggering an item
Arm 2Percent of Participant Triggering DMP ItemsDragging Across Surfaces8.8 % of participants triggering an item

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026