Skip to content

Mental Stress Reduction in Defibrillator Patients

Effectiveness of Mental Stress Reduction in Defibrillator Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00624520
Enrollment
129
Registered
2008-02-27
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2014-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anger, Arrhythmia, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Stress

Keywords

Stress, Psychological, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Defibrillators, Implantable, Death, Sudden Cardiac, Cognitive Therapy, Anger

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a 10 week program of Stress Management versus control Patient Education sessions on cardiac responses to mental stress in veterans with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled small clinical trial designed to determine whether a 10-week program of group cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) versus a control Patient Education program can improve hemodynamic responses to mental stress testing in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Comparison will be made between groups of heart rate and blood pressure responses to mental arithmetic and anger-recall mental stress, psychometric profiles, arrhythmia frequency and implantable cardioverter defibrillator firings before, immediately and up to 6 months after intervention. If benefit of CBSM is proven, study findings could lead to wider use of stress management programs, with increased life expectancy for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

Interventions

10 week program of weekly CBSM therapy group sessions

OTHERPatient Education

10 week program of Patient Education group sessions, involving presentations of educational materials relating to heart disease.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>21 years, * ICD Implantation, * \> 3 months following ICD implantation, * willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Episodes within prior 3 months of: acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infraction, Coronary Artery By-pass Graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, hospital admission any cause, * severe mental illness, * life expectancy \< 1 year, * hyperkalemia, * hypokalemia, * hypomagnesemia, * hypermagnesemia, * unwillingness to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress TaskImmediate to 6 months post interventionMaximum Mental Stress induced elevation in Double Product , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress task of mental arithmetic (serial subtraction). Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The math task was applied for 10 minutes, with 10 minutes recovery time. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect.
Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall TaskImmediate to 6 months post interventionMaximum Mental Stress induced elevation in Double Product , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress of anger-recall task. Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The anger-recall test was applied for 25 minutes with 10 minutes monitoring post-test. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived StressImmediate post interventionPsychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 2-27. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Depression/Dejection3 months post interventionPsychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 9 to 60. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Low Frequency Heart Rate Variability6 months post interventionHeart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity, believed to reflect a combination of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Low frequency heart rate variability correlates with cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity occur in this study population at high risk for cardiac arrhythmia. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.
State AngerImmediate post interventionPsychosocial score of negative mood derived from self-report questionnaires. Scale range was 15-45. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Low Frequency/High Frequency Ratio of Heart Rate Variability6 months post interventionHeart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Decreased Low/High Frequency ratio reflects Increased High Frequency heart rate variability which correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity, which may be beneficial in this patient population. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.
Cardioverter-DefibrillatorTherapies6 months post interventionCardioverter-Defibrillator therapies for treatment of serious ventricular arrhythmia
High Frequency Heart Rate Variability6 months post interventionHeart Rate Variability measure of Cardiac Parasympathetic activity. Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Increased High Frequency heart rate variability correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.
Tension/AnxietyImmediate post interventionPsychometric score by self-report questionnaire Scale range is 3-29. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment commenced October 2009, completed December 2011 Recruitment from Cardiology Clinics W S Middleton Veterans Hospital, Madison, and Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee

Pre-assignment details

Some enrolled participants were excluded from the trial if determined to have severe mental illness after administration of an SCID-I questionnaire and/or interview by a clinical psychologist. Others were excluded as drop-outs due to travel issues, weather, family issues, and illness. 2 subjects died before group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management
10 week program of Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) group sessions Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM): 10 week program of weekly CBSM therapy group sessions
56
Patient Education
10 week program of once weekly Patient Education group sessions Patient Education: 10 week program of Patient Education group sessions, involving presentations of educational materials relating to heart disease.
47
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementPatient EducationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants23 Participants55 Participants
Age, Continuous65.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
66.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
65.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants45 Participants101 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
51 Participants41 Participants92 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants47 participants103 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants46 Participants102 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 560 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 5612 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall Task

Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in Double Product , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress of anger-recall task. Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The anger-recall test was applied for 25 minutes with 10 minutes monitoring post-test. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect

Time frame: Immediate to 6 months post intervention

Population: Response to Mental Stress by Anger-Recall Stress Task

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall Task6 months post intervention711 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 232
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall Task3 months post intervention353 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 167
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall TaskImmediate post intervention406 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 93
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall Task6 months post intervention631 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 292
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall Task3 months post intervention548 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 308
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Anger-recall TaskImmediate post intervention681 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 244
Comparison: Initial sample size calculation, based on previous published data of effects sizes of anger stress management on heart rate and blood pressure responses in a veteran population, indicated a study population of 138 patients should detect a reduction in Double Product response to mental stress following psychological intervention, with over 90% power, assuming 20% drop-out rate.p-value: 0.81ANOVA
Primary

Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task

Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in Double Product , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress task of mental arithmetic (serial subtraction). Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The math task was applied for 10 minutes, with 10 minutes recovery time. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect.

Time frame: Immediate to 6 months post intervention

Population: Response to Mental Stress by Math Stress Task.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task6 months post1693 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 343
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task3 months post1399 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 201
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress TaskImmediate post1514 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 246
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task6 months post1137 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 228
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task3 months post1063 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 158
Patient EducationMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress TaskImmediate post1538 mmHg x beats/minStandard Error 224
Comparison: Initial sample size calculation, based on previous published data of effects sizes of anger stress management on heart rate and blood pressure responses in a veteran population, indicated a study population of 138 patients should detect a reduction in Double Product response to mental stress following psychological intervention, with over 90% power, assuming 20% drop-out rate.p-value: 0.18ANOVA
Primary

Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task

Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in Double Product , DP, (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress tasks of mental arithmetic (serial subtraction). Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The math task was applied for 10 minutes, with 10 minutes recovery time. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect.

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Response to mental stress by math task testing at 3 months post intervention, compared with pre-intervention. Within-group comparison is shown for matched pair data. The lower number of participants analyzed than at study entry is due to patient drop-outs during follow-up post-intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress TaskPre intervention1915 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 263
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementMental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task3 months post intervention1399 mmHg x beats/minuteStandard Error 201
p-value: 0.025ANCOVA
Secondary

Cardioverter-DefibrillatorTherapies

Cardioverter-Defibrillator therapies for treatment of serious ventricular arrhythmia

Time frame: 6 months post intervention

Population: Cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation data between 3 and 6 months post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementCardioverter-DefibrillatorTherapies0 percentage of participants
Patient EducationCardioverter-DefibrillatorTherapies6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.21Fisher Exact
Secondary

Depression/Dejection

Psychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 9 to 60. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: 3 months post intervention Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or failure to fully complete questionnaires during follow-up,with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementDepression/Dejection20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Patient EducationDepression/Dejection24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
p-value: 0.048ANOVA
Secondary

High Frequency Heart Rate Variability

Heart Rate Variability measure of Cardiac Parasympathetic activity. Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Increased High Frequency heart rate variability correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.

Time frame: 6 months post intervention

Population: Reduced participant numbers reflect drop-outs and exclusion of participants with non-diagnostic recordings for HRV analyses, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementHigh Frequency Heart Rate Variability41 percentage of spectral powerStandard Deviation 19
Patient EducationHigh Frequency Heart Rate Variability26 percentage of spectral powerStandard Deviation 16
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Low Frequency Heart Rate Variability

Heart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity, believed to reflect a combination of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Low frequency heart rate variability correlates with cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity occur in this study population at high risk for cardiac arrhythmia. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.

Time frame: 6 months post intervention

Population: 6 months post intervention, from ECG recordings during mental stress tasks Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or non-diagnostic recordings for HRV analyses during follow-up, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementLow Frequency Heart Rate Variability59 percentage of spectral powerStandard Deviation 19
Patient EducationLow Frequency Heart Rate Variability70 percentage of spectral powerStandard Deviation 21
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Low Frequency/High Frequency Ratio of Heart Rate Variability

Heart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Decreased Low/High Frequency ratio reflects Increased High Frequency heart rate variability which correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity, which may be beneficial in this patient population. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.

Time frame: 6 months post intervention

Population: Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or non-diagnostic recordings for heart rate variability analyses during follow-up, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.~Data are shown for Ratios of Low and High Frequency power shown above.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementLow Frequency/High Frequency Ratio of Heart Rate Variability1.99 RatioStandard Deviation 1.47
Patient EducationLow Frequency/High Frequency Ratio of Heart Rate Variability4.01 RatioStandard Deviation 3.26
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Perceived Stress

Psychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 2-27. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..

Time frame: Immediate post intervention

Population: Immediate post intervention Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or failure to fully complete questionnaires during follow-up, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementPerceived Stress10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Patient EducationPerceived Stress14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
p-value: 0.011ANOVA
Secondary

State Anger

Psychosocial score of negative mood derived from self-report questionnaires. Scale range was 15-45. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..

Time frame: Immediate post intervention

Population: Serial psychometric scores up to 6 months post intervention Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or failure to fully complete questionnaires during follow-up, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementState Anger16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Patient EducationState Anger19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Secondary

Tension/Anxiety

Psychometric score by self-report questionnaire Scale range is 3-29. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..

Time frame: Immediate post intervention

Population: Immediate post intervention Reduced numbers of participants analyzed reflect drop-outs or failure to fully complete questionnaires during follow-up, with inclusion only of participants having accurate and appropriate data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavioral Stress ManagementTension/Anxiety8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Patient EducationTension/Anxiety12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.003ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026