Skip to content

Neurobiology and Treatment of Reading Disability in NF-1

Neurobiology and Treatment of Reading Disability in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF-1)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00624234
Enrollment
184
Registered
2008-02-27
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2025-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurofibromatosis Type 1, Reading Disabilities

Keywords

neurofibromatosis type 1, reading disabilities, NF-1, learning disabilities, tutoring intervention

Brief summary

The goal of this trial is to determine if children with neurofibromatosis type 1 who have reading disabilities respond the same way-both behaviorally and neurobiologically-to specialized treatment programs as children with idiopathic reading disabilities do, and to determine which intervention is best for particular learner profiles.

Detailed description

The most common concern of parents of children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is learning disabilities (LD). Approximately one half of all children with NF-1 have LD-the most debilitating and common of which are reading disabilities. The purpose of this study is to determine if children with NF-1 who have reading disabilities respond the same way-both behaviorally and neurobiologically-to specialized treatment programs known to improve the decoding deficits in children with idiopathic reading disabilities. The trial will also determine which intervention is best for particular learner profiles. The overall purpose of this research is to gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics and treatment of reading disabilities in NF-1. In the trial, researchers will compare children with NF-1 who show weaknesses in reading to children with reading disabilities of no known cause (idiopathic) using two different interventions and behavioral and neurobiological measures. Both interventions focus on teaching sound-symbol relationships, but vary in terms of relative emphasis on verbal versus visual methods of teaching. Scientists hope findings from the trial will advance knowledge about the best therapies for LD in children with NF-1. And, by further refining how children with NF-1 who have reading disabilities are similar (or different) to children with idiopathic reading disabilities, the researchers may be able to learn if reading interventions that address areas other than decoding will also benefit children with NF-1. Also, by understanding the similarities and/or differences in the neuropsychological and neurobiological profiles of children with NF-1 who have reading disabilities, and those without, scientists will be able to refine the cognitive phenotype and neurobiological characteristics of NF-1, which will further understanding of central nervous system abnormalities in NF-1.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTutoring Program I

Tutoring Program I is a structured multi-sensory program that is designed to gradually present the range of sounds and letters with focus on accuracy of phonological concepts and application of those concepts in phrases and sentences. The instruction uses a sequenced defined lesson plan with accuracy and automaticity criteria for skill progression. A range of manipulative and kinesthetic activities is outlined to maintain learner engagement in the intensive intervention design.

BEHAVIORALTutoring Program II

Tutoring Program II is designed to teach visual and speech elements of reading separately at first, and then bring them together for maximum efficiency. The program uses the idea of teaching concepts about the structure of words. For example, students transfer the rules they have learned about one vowel or structure to another without specific instructions on the new one. Tutoring Program II incorporates pictures and activities to help remember strategies for increasing basic reading skills. Speed drills are also used for development of decoding automaticity.

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

This study will be open to all individuals, ages 8 to 17 years, who meet eligibility criteria regardless of race, gender, or socioeconomic status. * The Reading Disabilities group (including those with NF-1) is defined by scoring equal to or less than the 25th percentile on measures of basic word reading skills. * The Control group (including those with NF1) is defined by scoring equal to or above the 40th percentile on the average of the Letter Word Identification and Word Attack subtests from the WJ-III.

Exclusion criteria

Any child, regardless of which group he/she is recruited for, will be excluded if he/she meets any of the following criteria (determined during phone screening, medical review, and during testing): * is in foster care; * previous diagnosis of mental retardation; * known uncorrectable visual impairment; * history of known neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy, spina bifida, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury); * documented hearing impairment greater than 25 dB loss in either ear; * medical contraindication to MRI procedures, if participating in MRI (including exposure to metal and pregnancy); * individuals known to have an IQ below 70; * history or presence of a pervasive developmental disorder; * during the DICA-IV parents indicate the presence of any severe psychiatric diagnoses or pervasive developmental disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours0 and 15 hoursThis metric measures change in reading abilities, including word recognition and decoding, as assessed by standard educational assessments (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition Normative Update; WJ-III NU). The scores are reported as change in age-normed standard scores (a change of 15 standard score points would represent a change of 1 standard deviation in the general population).The Basic Reading score is a normed composite of the WJ-III subtests Letter-Word Identification and Word Attack, representing word-level reading skill.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuroimaging DataCollected before and after interventionNeuroimaging data consists of functional MRI and structural MRI measures.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period was 2006-2012 and was done via NF organizations and NF clinics, as well as the community recruitment.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusions: Incomplete Data (n=31), NF without Reading Difficulty (n=11), Age (n=13; excluded CNT and RD age 15yr and over because no NF-RD over 14yr), Low IQ (n=2), Ineligible (n=12; did not fit criteria for either RD or CNT group), Prior to Intervention Change (n=26; enrolled prior to an NIH-approved change in study design regarding intervention)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NF-Tutoring Program 1
Tutoring Program I Tutoring Program I: Tutoring Program I is a structured multi-sensory program that is designed to gradually present the range of sounds and letters with focus on accuracy of phonological concepts and application of those concepts in phrases and sentences. The instruction uses a sequenced defined lesson plan with accuracy and automaticity criteria for skill progression. A range of manipulative and kinesthetic activities is outlined to maintain learner engagement in the intensive intervention design.
8
NF-Tutoring Program 2
Tutoring Program II Tutoring Program II: Tutoring Program II is designed to teach visual and speech elements of reading separately at first, and then bring them together for maximum efficiency. The program uses the idea of teaching concepts about the structure of words. For example, students transfer the rules they have learned about one vowel or structure to another without specific instructions on the new one. Tutoring Program II incorporates pictures and activities to help remember strategies for increasing basic reading skills. Speed drills are also used for development of decoding automaticity.
9
Typically Developing Readers
Control group--children who do not have reading problems
26
IRD- Tutoring Program 1
These are children with reading disabilities (without NF - ideopathic reading disabilities; IRD) who received Tutoring Program I Tutoring Program I: Tutoring Program I is a structured multi-sensory program that is designed to gradually present the range of sounds and letters with focus on accuracy of phonological concepts and application of those concepts in phrases and sentences. The instruction uses a sequenced defined lesson plan with accuracy and automaticity criteria for skill progression. A range of manipulative and kinesthetic activities is outlined to maintain learner engagement in the intensive intervention design.
14
IRD-Tutoring Program 2
These are children with reading disabilities (without NF - ideopathic reading disabilities; IRD) who received Tutoring Program II Tutoring Program II: Tutoring Program II is designed to teach visual and speech elements of reading separately at first, and then bring them together for maximum efficiency. The program uses the idea of teaching concepts about the structure of words. For example, students transfer the rules they have learned about one vowel or structure to another without specific instructions on the new one. Tutoring Program II incorporates pictures and activities to help remember strategies for increasing basic reading skills. Speed drills are also used for development of decoding automaticity.
18
Waitlist Control
These are children who have reading disabilities (without NF) but did not receive intervention until after the trial.
14
Total89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNF-Tutoring Program 1NF-Tutoring Program 2Typically Developing ReadersIRD- Tutoring Program 1IRD-Tutoring Program 2Waitlist ControlTotal
Age, Continuous9.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13
11.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48
9.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53
10.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63
10.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12
10.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.25
10.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants1 Participants13 Participants6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants8 Participants13 Participants8 Participants9 Participants11 Participants52 Participants
Woodcock Johnson Achievement Tests78.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05
85.78 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.24
103.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.41
77.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
79.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.59
79.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.66
86.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.48

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 90 / 260 / 140 / 180 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 90 / 260 / 140 / 180 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours

This metric measures change in reading abilities, including word recognition and decoding, as assessed by standard educational assessments (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition Normative Update; WJ-III NU). The scores are reported as change in age-normed standard scores (a change of 15 standard score points would represent a change of 1 standard deviation in the general population).The Basic Reading score is a normed composite of the WJ-III subtests Letter-Word Identification and Word Attack, representing word-level reading skill.

Time frame: 0 and 15 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NF-Tutoring Program 1Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours13.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.61
NF-Tutoring Program 2Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours-1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
Typically Developing ReadersChange From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours-.115 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
IRD- Tutoring Program 1Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours5.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
IRD-Tutoring Program 2Change From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours3.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.93
Waitlist ControlChange From Baseline in WJ-III Basic Reading Normative Update (Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - 3rd Edition; WJ-III NU) Standard Score at 15 Hours.143 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Secondary

Neuroimaging Data

Neuroimaging data consists of functional MRI and structural MRI measures.

Time frame: Collected before and after intervention

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026