Skip to content

Long-term Safety of Rivastigmine Capsule and Patch in Patients With Mild to Moderately-severe Dementia Associated With Parkinson's Disease (PDD)

A 76-week Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Long-term Effect of Rivastigmine Capsule and Transdermal Patch on Worsening of the Underlying Motor Symptoms of PD in Patients With Mild to Moderately Severe Dementia Associated With Parkinson's Disease (PDD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00623103
Enrollment
583
Registered
2008-02-25
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease Dementia

Keywords

Parkinson's disease dementia, cholinesterase inhibitor, rivastigmine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to provide long-term safety data for rivastigmine capsule and transdermal patch treatments, in particular the effect of rivastigmine on worsening of the underlying motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD), in patients with mild to moderately severe dementia associated with PD.

Interventions

DRUGRivastigmine capsule

Rivastigmine capsules orally twice a day. Target dose 12 mg/day.

Rivastigmine patch once a day in the morning, worn for 24 hours. Target dose 10 cm\^2/day delivering 9.5 mg over a 24 hour period.

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, according to the UK Parkinson's disease Society Brain Bank criteria * Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease dementia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria, with onset of symptoms of dementia at least 2 years following the first diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease * Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥10 and ≤ 26 (at Screening Visit only)

Exclusion criteria

* An advanced, severe, or unstable disease of any type that may interfere with the primary and secondary variable evaluations * A score of 5 (wheelchair bound or bedridden) in the on-state on the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging (UPDRS Part V) * A current diagnosis of any primary neurodegenerative disorder other than idiopathic PD * A current diagnosis of any treatable dementia (hypothyroidism, syphilis, vitamin B12 or folate deficiency) that is verified by the investigator to be the cause of dementia. * A current diagnosis of probably vascular dementia according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association International pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria * A current diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV criteria * A history of stereotaxic brain surgery for Parkinson's disease * A known exaggerated pharmacological sensitivity or hypersensitivity to drugs similar to rivastigmine or to other cholinergic compounds Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)76 WeeksThe AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall)in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with the rates were also presented.
Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)76 WeeksThe discontinuations due to these AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall) in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with these rates were also presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineFrom Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76The Ten Point Clock Test measures executive functioning and visuospatial skills. Participants are asked to put numbers on the face of a clock and then make the clock read 10 minutes after 11. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 10 for spacing of specific numbers and the positions of the hands. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates improvement.
Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineAt Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)The parameter for analysis was the change from baseline of total score of 10 items on the NPI scale (NPI-10). The total score is a sum of the 10 domains, where the score for a domain is defined as the product of frequency (range: 1-4) and severity (range: 1-3). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score(thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score patient can get). The change from baseline was calculated such that a negative number indicates an improvement (symptom reduction).
Change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineFrom Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). Part III records the motor examination in Items 18-31 rated on a scale of 0 to 4 with (0 being absent/ normal and 4 being the worse) for a total possible score of 0 to 56.
UPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)From Baseline to Week 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). UPDRS Part V is assessed by the modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no signs of disease) to 5 (wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided).
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineFrom Baseline to Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)The 23 item caregiver-based ADL scale of the dementia Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) was used for analysis. This is a caregiver rated questionnaire of 23 items, with possible scores over a range of 0-78, where 78 denote full functioning with no impairment. The total score was derived by adding up the item scores of the 23 items. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive change indicates an improvement.
Change in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineFrom Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76Mattis DRS-2 is a measure of cognitive status. The total score is the sum of 5 subscale scores: Attention \[0-37\], Initiation/Perservation \[0-37\] (performing alternating movements), Construction \[0-6\] (copying designs), Conceptualization \[0-39\] (similarities) and Memory \[0-25\] (sentence recall, design recognition)for a total possible score of 0-144. Higher score is reflective of better cognitive function, lower scores associated with more pronounced cognitive deficit. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates an improvement.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rivastigmine Capsule
Rivastigmine capsules starting at a total dose of 3 mg/day (1.5 mg twice daily orally) titrated up in 3 mg/day increments every 4 weeks to a final dose of 12 mg/day (6 mg twice daily orally0. The 12 mg/day dose or the highest dose tolerated was maintained until week 76.
295
Rivastigmine Patch
Rivastigmine patch once a day in the morning, worn for 24 hours, starting at 5 cm\^2 (delivering 4.6 mg rivastigmine over a 24 hour period) for 4 weeks then titrated up to 10 cm\^2 daily (delivering 9.5 mg rivastigmine over a 24 hour period). The 10 cm\^2 patch or the highest well tolerated dose was maintained until week 76.
288
Total583

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems24
Overall StudyAdverse Event7060
Overall StudyDeath1111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up41
Overall StudyProtocol deviation21
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect412
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1824

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRivastigmine CapsuleRivastigmine PatchTotal
Age Continuous72.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.295
72.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.352
72.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.318
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants97 Participants185 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
207 Participants191 Participants398 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
239 / 294215 / 288
serious
Total, serious adverse events
87 / 29483 / 288

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)

The AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall)in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with the rates were also presented.

Time frame: 76 Weeks

Population: Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had 1 post-baseline safety measurement. Participants with observation at 76 weeks were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Tremor24.5 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Muscle Rigidity4.1 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Bradykinesia5.1 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Fall17.0 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Fall20.1 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Tremor9.7 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Bradykinesia6.3 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Muscle Rigidity5.2 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)

The discontinuations due to these AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall) in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with these rates were also presented.

Time frame: 76 Weeks

Population: Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had 1 post-baseline safety measurement. Participants with observation at 76 weeks were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Tremor2.4 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Muscle Rigidity0.3 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Bradykinesia1.0 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine CapsulePercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Fall1.0 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Fall1.4 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Tremor0.7 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Bradykinesia0.0 Percentage of participants
Rivastigmine PatchPercentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall)Muscle Rigidity0.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline

The 23 item caregiver-based ADL scale of the dementia Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) was used for analysis. This is a caregiver rated questionnaire of 23 items, with possible scores over a range of 0-78, where 78 denote full functioning with no impairment. The total score was derived by adding up the item scores of the 23 items. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive change indicates an improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-treat population which included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pre- and post-baseline assessment for 1 of the efficacy variables. Last observation carried forward. (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16 (n=273, 270)-0.4 ScoreStandard Deviation 9.6
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (n=273,270)-0.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.12
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52 (n=273,270)-2.2 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.13
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76 (n=273, 270)-4.4 ScoreStandard Deviation 13.13
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76 (n=273, 270)-7.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 15.62
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16 (n=273, 270)-1.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.38
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52 (n=273,270)-5.4 ScoreStandard Deviation 13.57
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (n=273,270)-1.5 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.91
Secondary

Change in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to Baseline

Mattis DRS-2 is a measure of cognitive status. The total score is the sum of 5 subscale scores: Attention \[0-37\], Initiation/Perservation \[0-37\] (performing alternating movements), Construction \[0-6\] (copying designs), Conceptualization \[0-39\] (similarities) and Memory \[0-25\] (sentence recall, design recognition)for a total possible score of 0-144. Higher score is reflective of better cognitive function, lower scores associated with more pronounced cognitive deficit. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates an improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76

Population: Intent-to-treat population which included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pre- and post-baseline assessment for 1 of the efficacy variables. Last observation carried forward. (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 165.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.98
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 246.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.98
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 524.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.62
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 763.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.82
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 76-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.43
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 163.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.53
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 521.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.07
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to BaselineWeek 244.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.85
Secondary

Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline

The parameter for analysis was the change from baseline of total score of 10 items on the NPI scale (NPI-10). The total score is a sum of the 10 domains, where the score for a domain is defined as the product of frequency (range: 1-4) and severity (range: 1-3). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score(thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score patient can get). The change from baseline was calculated such that a negative number indicates an improvement (symptom reduction).

Time frame: At Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-treat population which included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pre- and post-baseline assessment for 1 of the efficacy variables. Last observation carried forward. (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16-3.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 9.75
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24-2.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.31
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52-1.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.4
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76-1.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.22
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 760.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 12.62
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16-0.5 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.89
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52-0.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.26
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24-1.0 ScoreStandard Deviation 10.27
Secondary

Change in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline

The Ten Point Clock Test measures executive functioning and visuospatial skills. Participants are asked to put numbers on the face of a clock and then make the clock read 10 minutes after 11. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 10 for spacing of specific numbers and the positions of the hands. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76

Population: Intent-to-treat population which included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pre- and post-baseline assessment for 1 of the efficacy variables. Last observation carried forward. (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 240.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 520.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 760.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 160.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 160.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 240.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.57
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
Secondary

Change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline

Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). Part III records the motor examination in Items 18-31 rated on a scale of 0 to 4 with (0 being absent/ normal and 4 being the worse) for a total possible score of 0 to 56.

Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had 1 post-baseline safety measurement. n in each of the categories is the number of participants at each time point with non-missing baseline and post-baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16 (n=254,252)0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.72
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52 (n=203,206)0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.66
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (n=229,237)0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.19
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76 (n=183,175)2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
Rivastigmine CapsuleChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 8 (n=276,277)-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.99
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 76 (n=183,175)2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.65
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 8 (n=276,277)-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.05
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 16 (n=254,252)-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.44
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (n=229,237)-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Rivastigmine PatchChange in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to BaselineWeek 52 (n=203,206)1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
Secondary

UPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)

Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). UPDRS Part V is assessed by the modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no signs of disease) to 5 (wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided).

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation)

Population: The Safety population consisted of all patients who have received at least one dose of study drug and have had at least 1 safety measurement after baseline. n=indicates patients with observation during different timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 8 (n=17,18)2.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 52 (n=202,208)2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.73
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 24 (229, 236)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.75
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 76 (n=184, 175)2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.74
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 16 (n=254,252)2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.68
Rivastigmine CapsuleUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Baseline (n = 294,288)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 76 (n=184, 175)2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.79
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Baseline (n = 294,288)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 8 (n=17,18)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 1.05
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 16 (n=254,252)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 24 (229, 236)2.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Rivastigmine PatchUPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation)Week 52 (n=202,208)2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.69

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026