Skip to content

The Efficacy of Hand Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B (NBUVB) Versus Excilite Treatment in Vitiligo After Minigrafting on the Dorsal Hands

The Efficacy of Hand-Foot Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B (UVB) Versus Focal 308-nm Treatment in Inducing Repigmentation of Vitiligo After Minigrafting on the Dorsal Hands

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00622180
Enrollment
13
Registered
2008-02-22
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2019-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitiligo

Keywords

Vitiligo, Light treatment for vitiligo, Excilite

Brief summary

To assess over a 25-week period the efficacy of hand-foot narrow-band ultraviolet B light versus focal 308-nm light treatment in inducing the return of pigment in vitiligo after skin minigraft transplants to the backs of the hands in patients with light brown to black skin. Subject will undergo treatment for 13 weeks.

Detailed description

Prospective investigator-blinded study involving 13 adult male and female subjects with vitiligo on the backs of both hands. Punch minigrafting will be performed on both hands taking skin from the thighs and/or buttocks. Light treatments will be administered starting at week one after grafting. One hand will receive narrow-band ultraviolet B light and the other will receive focal 308-nm light treatments. Light treatments will be administered 3 times per week for 12 weeks. A long term follow-up visit will be completed at week 25. The investigator will evaluate the subjects at week 4, 7, 13 and 25 in addition to screening and baseline evaluations/procedures.

Interventions

DEVICENBUVB

NBUVB hand foot box

DEVICEMonochromacitc Excimer light

Treatment with Monochromacitc Excimer light

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male and female subjects 18 years of age or older * skin type III-VI * vitiligo on both dorsal hands * history of stable vitiligo ( no new lesions and no more than 10% enlargement of existing lesions) for six months with an absence of Kebner phenomenon (new lesions appearing after trauma to the skin) * refractory to topical steroids and immunomodulators

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant and/or breast-feeding females * history of skin cancer * history of taking photosensitizing medications * history of recent phototherapy (light therapy) or topical medications within one month prior to enrollment * history of organ transplantation * history of failed vitiligo skin transplantation * history of segmental vitiligo * history of 12 or more continuous light treatments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Repigmentation of Target Lesion25 weeksThis is measured using photography and Scion software calculations.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

It was our hope to enroll 26 Participants but only 13 was enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
The Efficacy of Hand NBUVB Vs. Excilite Treatment in Vitiligo
Light therapy with the NBUVB hand-foot box to one hand and the Excilite to the other hand three times a week on non-consecutive days for a total of 12 weeks. The light will be dosed as follows: starting dose for NBUVB will be 200 mJ/cm2 with subsequent dose increases of 15% per treatment as tolerated. For the Excilite device, the starting dose will be 200 mJ with subsequent dose increases of 50 mJ per treatment as tolerated.
13
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicThe Efficacy of Hand NBUVB Vs. Excilite Treatment in Vitiligo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Repigmentation of Target Lesion

This is measured using photography and Scion software calculations.

Time frame: 25 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NBUVBPercent Repigmentation of Target Lesion0.21 percentage of repigmentationStandard Deviation 0.35
Monochromatic Excimer LightPercent Repigmentation of Target Lesion0.17 percentage of repigmentationStandard Deviation 0.38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026