Skip to content

Lamotrigine for Symptoms of Geriatric Bipolar Depression

Open-label, Prospective Trial of Lamotrigine for Symptoms of Geriatric Bipolar Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00621842
Acronym
Geri-BD SAD
Enrollment
57
Registered
2008-02-22
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Bipolar

Keywords

Geriatric Psychiatry, Aged, lamotrigine

Brief summary

This is a 12-week, open label trial of lamotrigine for older adults (age 60 and older) with type I or type II Bipolar depression. Non-demented older adults with Bipolar I or II depression, confirmed via the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM) - Patient edition (SCID-I/P) and meeting inclusion criteria for depressive symptom severity (score of 18 or greater on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale/HAM-D-24) will receive add-on lamotrigine dosed to a target of 200 mg/day.

Interventions

DRUGLamotrigine regular tablet formulation

Day 0 lamotrigine regular tablet formulation or lamotrigine novel formulation will be initiated at 25 mg/day and upward titrated as per package insert to targeted maximum dose of 200 mg/day. Dosing will be reduced for individuals who experience adverse effects. Dosing will be modified as per package insert for lamotrigine for individuals on anticonvulsant compounds.

DRUGLamotrigine novel formulation

Participants will have the option of trying a novel formulation of lamotrigine tablets instead of the lamotrigine regular formulation tablets. The dosing will remain the same regardless of which type of lamotrigine tablet is used. Day 0 lamotrigine regular tablet formulation or lamotrigine novel formulation will be initiated at 25 mg/day and upward titrated as per package insert to targeted maximum dose of 200 mg/day. Dosing will be reduced for individuals who experience adverse effects. Dosing will be modified as per package insert for lamotrigine for individuals on anticonvulsant compounds.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 60 Years or older * BP Disorder-I or II: Depressive episode (DSM -IV-TR; SCID-I/P) * HAM-D score \> 18 (GRID-HAM-D 24-item version) * Availability of an Informant is encouraged but not required for study participation

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic psychotic conditions, ie. schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder * Contraindication to lamotrigine (Physician interview, medical assessment) * Documented history of intolerance to lamotrigine * Patients who have previously failed to respond to at least 12 weeks of treatment with lamotrigine * Active substance dependence (SCID-I/P) or substance-related safety issues or PI concerns * Mood Disorder Due to a General Medical Condition or Treatment (Physician interview) * Rapid cycling (Physician interview): As defined in DSM-IV: At least 4 episodes of mood disturbance in the previous 12 months that meet criteria for a Major Depressive, Manic, Mixed or Hypomanic Episode. Episodes are distinguished either by partial or full remission for at least 2 months or by a switch to an episode of opposite polarity * Dementia (by DSM-IV or brain degenerative diseases; Physician interview); * Inability to communicate in English (i.e., interview cannot be conducted without an interpreter; subject largely unable to understand questions and cannot respond in English) * Clinically significant sensory impairment (i.e., cannot see well enough to read consent or visually-presented material; cannot hear well enough to cooperate with interview; Physician interview) * Recent history of cardiovascular, peripheral vascular events or stroke * High risk for suicide (e.g., active SI or current intent or plan) * Inpatient status

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)12 weeksFrequency of adverse effects was measured using the UKU. The total number of adverse effects assessed by the UKU is 49 plus one open-ended question about any adverse effects not assessed.
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline Using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAM-D)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 78. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Manic Symptoms From Baseline Using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 4. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Body Weight From Baseline12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Overall Clinical Diagnosis Using the CGI-BP12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 4. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Change in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS)12 weeksThe minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 5. A higher score implies a worse condition.
Number of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention12 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention and Was Related to Lamotrigine12 weeks
Number of Participants Who Fell at Least Once During the Study12 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in January 2008 and ended in December 2009. The study screened and enrolled participants at five academic institutions in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were required to have a score of 18 or higher on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24 to be included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open-label Lamotrigine Treatment
This solitary group received open-label lamotrigine treatment for bipolar depression.
57
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen-label Lamotrigine Treatment
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants
Age, Continuous66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-15.5 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference score between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [-18, -12.9]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Assessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)

Frequency of adverse effects was measured using the UKU. The total number of adverse effects assessed by the UKU is 49 plus one open-ended question about any adverse effects not assessed.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants was chosen from the number who received at least one dose of lamotrigine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)reduced sleep duration14 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)weight loss12 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)increased dream activity12 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)polyuria/polydipsia11 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)weight gain9 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)increased sleep9 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)lassitude/fatigue8 participants
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentAssessment of Adverse Effects With the Udvalg Fur Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU)unsteady gait8 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Overall Clinical Diagnosis Using the CGI-BP

The minimum possible score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Clinical Diagnosis Using the CGI-BP-2.06 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [-2.43, -1.68]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 4. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)-.79 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-1.67, 0.09]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Body Weight From Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in Body Weight From Baseline.83 lbs.
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: 0.3695% CI: [-0.97, 2.62]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline Using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAM-D)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 78. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline Using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAM-D)-15.2 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference score between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [-17.5, -12.9]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Manic Symptoms From Baseline Using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in Manic Symptoms From Baseline Using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)-.47 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference score between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: 0.4995% CI: [-1.82, 0.88]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 5. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS)-.53 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-1.03, -0.04]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum score is 4. A higher score implies a worse condition.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by number of completers plus number of dropouts where the last known observation of a dropout taking lamotrigine was carried forward. Missing data and the lack of 3 participants completing more than the baseline assessment yielded a number for analysis that was less than total enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentChange in or Appearance of Extrapyramidal Symptoms From Baseline Using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS)-.04 units on a scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean difference between the 12 week time point or LOCF and baseline is zero.p-value: 0.895% CI: [-0.36, 0.28]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Fell at Least Once During the Study

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants was chosen from the number who received at least one dose of lamotrigine.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentNumber of Participants Who Fell at Least Once During the Study18 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants was chosen from the number who received at least one dose of lamotrigine.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentNumber of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention5 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention and Was Related to Lamotrigine

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants was chosen from the number who received at least one dose of lamotrigine.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Open-label Lamotrigine TreatmentNumber of Participants Who Had a Fall That Required Medical Attention and Was Related to Lamotrigine1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026