Skip to content

Endometrial Markers and Response of Endometriosis Patients to Prolonged GnRH Agonist Prior to IVF

Do Endometrial Implantation Markers Predict in Vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Cycle Outcomes in Endometriosis Patients Pretreated With Leuprolide Acetate in Depot Suspension?

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00621179
Acronym
IntegrinIVF
Enrollment
37
Registered
2008-02-22
Start date
2003-03-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2021-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis, Infertility

Keywords

Endometriosis,infertility,in vitro fertilization

Brief summary

This prospective randomized trial evaluates whether one can predict which infertile women with endometriosis who are candidates for in vitro fertilization will benefit from prolonged therapy with a GnRH agonist by the determination of the absence of endometrial expression of the integrin, alpha v, beta 3 vitronectin. This is a prospective randomized trial in which all patients will undergo endometrial biopsy prior to initiation of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and then undergo randomization to a three month course of a depot preparation of the GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate in depot suspension prior to ovarian stimulation or standard therapy. prio

Detailed description

See summary

Interventions

DRUGLeuprolide acetate in depot suspension

Leuprolide acetate in depot suspension 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days x 3

OTHERNo intervention

Sponsors

Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infertility * Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis * Normal ovarian reserve testing * Regular menses

Exclusion criteria

* Irregular menses * Undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding * Pregnancy * Prior adverse reaction to any GnRH agonist * Ovarian cystic or solid mass \> 3cm in mean diameter at study entry * Use of a depot preparation of a GnRh agonist or any hormonal therapy for endometriosis within 6 months of study entry * Current hepatic, renal, hematologic or psychiatric disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian HyperstimulationEvaluated at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy which is 4 weeks post embryo transfer.Number of patients who responded to controlled ovarian stimulation as evidenced by implantation of embryo. Implantation confirmed by ultrasound at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
Positive endometrial alpha v, beta 3 vitronectin expression. Standard controlled ovarian stimulation protocol followed by in vitro fertilization
12
Group 2
Intervention: Positive endometrial alpha v beta 3 vitronectin expression, 3 months of leuprolide acetate in depot suspension administration prior to initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation followed by in vitro fertilization Leuprolide acetate in depot suspension: Leuprolide acetate in depot suspension 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days x 3
8
Group 3
Negative endometrial alpha v, beta 3 vitronectin and administration of leuprolide acetate in depot suspension for 3 months prior to initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation Leuprolide acetate in depot suspension: Leuprolide acetate in depot suspension 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days x 3
7
Group 4
Negative endometrial alpha v, beta 3 vitronectin expression and standard controlled ovarian stimulation protocol followed by in vitro fertilization.
9
Total36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 2Group 3Group 4Group 1Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants7 Participants9 Participants12 Participants36 Participants
Age, Continuous33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.55
33.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.79
32.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95
33.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.11
33.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants7 participants9 participants12 participants36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants7 Participants9 Participants12 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 80 / 70 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 80 / 70 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 80 / 70 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

Number of patients who responded to controlled ovarian stimulation as evidenced by implantation of embryo. Implantation confirmed by ultrasound at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy.

Time frame: Evaluated at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy which is 4 weeks post embryo transfer.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation7 Participants
Group 2Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation5 Participants
Group 3Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation3 Participants
Group 4Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026