Skip to content

Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Doses of a Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Above

A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Observer-blind, Multi Center Study on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Novartis Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine (Containing Both Interpandemic Strains and H5N1) in Adults Aged 18 Years and Above

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00620815
Enrollment
601
Registered
2008-02-22
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Keywords

avian flu, seasonal influenza vaccine, influenza vaccine, prepandemic vaccine, virus strain with the potential to cause pandemic, tetravalent vaccine, Prophylaxis of influenza

Brief summary

Evaluate the immune response and reactogenicity of H5N1 vaccination in adults aged 18 years and above (as part of a tetravalent vaccine)

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMF59-eTIV-H5N1+ placebo /pandemic influenza vaccine

Tetravalent influenza vaccine (MF59-eTIV-H5N1)and placebo on day 1 followed 3-5 weeks later by pandemic influenza vaccine, including serology blood draw at V1+V3.

BIOLOGICALPandemic influenza vaccine + placebo /MF59-eTIV-H5N1

Pandemic influenza vaccine plus placebo on day 1 followed 3-5 weeks later by tetravalent influenza vaccine (MF59-eTIV-H5N1), including serology blood draw at V1+V3.

BIOLOGICALPandemic influenza vaccine + seasonal influenza vaccine /pandemic influenza vaccine

Pandemic influenza vaccine plus seasonal influenza vaccine, 3-5 weeks later pandemic influenza vaccine , including serology blood draw at V1+V3.

BIOLOGICALPandemic influenza vaccine + placebo / MF59-eTIV-H5N1

Pandemic influenza vaccine plus placebo followed 3-5 weeks later by tetravalent influenza vaccine (MF59-eTIV-H5N1), including serology blood draw at V1, V2 and V3.

BIOLOGICALPandemic influenza vaccine + seasonal influenza vaccine / pandemic influenza vaccine

Pandemic influenza vaccine plus seasonal influenza vaccine followed 3-5 weeks later by pandemic influenza vaccine, including serology blood draw at V1, V2 and V3.

BIOLOGICALMF59-eTIV-H5N1 + Placebo/pandemic influenza vaccine

Tetravalent influenza vaccine (MF59-eTIV-H5N1)plus placebo followed 3-5 weeks later by pandemic influenza vaccine, including serology blood draw at V1, V2 and V3.

Sponsors

Novartis Vaccines
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy subjects (aged 18 years and above) who have signed an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Any acute or chronic illness * Receipt of seasonal influenza vaccine for the current season 2007/2008 * Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function * Receipt of another vaccine within 3 weeks prior to Visit 1 or planned vaccination within 3 weeks following the last study vaccination * Any serious disease * Hypersensitivity to eggs, chicken protein, chicken feathers, influenza viral protein,neomycin or kanamycin or any other component of the study vaccine * Receipt of blood, blood products or immunoglobulins 3 months prior to vaccination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.up to day 43The antibody response was determined by SRH assay. Geometric mean areas (GMAs) and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) in the SRH assay were used to demonstrate the equivalence. The statistical analysis was done based on the GMRs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationUp to 7 days after 1st vaccinationLocal reactions were collected up to 7 days after 1st vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record local reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization. The table represents local reactions after first vaccination in each arm differently.
Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationUp to 7 days after 2nd vaccinationLocal reactions were collected up to 7 days after 1st vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record local reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization.
Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.7 days after 1st and 2nd vaccinations eachSystemic reactions were collected upto 7 days after 1st and 2nd vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record systemic reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization.
Percentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2Up to 43 daysMeasurement of immunogenicity in terms of percentage of subjects achieving a titre ≥ 40/area ≥ 25mm\^2 after immunization as determined by HI (Haemagglutination Inhibition), MN(Microneutralization) and SRH assay.
Antibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.Up to 43 daysMeasurement of immunogenicity in terms of Geometric mean titers (GMTs) as determined by HI and MN assay.
Percentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.Three weeks after first vaccination (day 22) and three weeks after second vaccination (day 43)The Cell Mediated Immunity (CMI) response was evaluated in a randomly selected subgroup of approximately 92 subjects from all the vaccine groups out of a total of 601 enrolled subjects. Frequency of circulating memory B cells (MBC), capable of differentiating in vitro into cell secreting IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies specific for H5N1 (the subunit from A/Vietnam/1194/2004) or for H1N1 (the subunit from A/Solomon Island/3/2006) were determined by an ELISA-coupled limiting dilution assay.The frequency of H5N1-IgG MBC and H1N1-IgG MBC was expressed as percentages (%) of total IgG producing MBC.
Mean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitThree weeks after 1st vaccination (day 22) and three weeks after 2nd vaccination (day 43)Frequency and functionality of vaccine antigen-specific CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) T cells was assessed in peripheral blood (PBMC) taken at days 1, 22 and 43 after in vitro stimulation with: Library of 70 peptides spanning the whole H5 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 protein (H5 pool of 70 Vietnam) H5N1 subunit from A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1 Vietnam) H3N2 subunit from A/ Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2 Wisconsin) H1N1 subunit from A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1 Solomon Islands) Polyclonal stimulus agonistic aCD3 mAb \[monoclonal antibody (aCD3)\]. The change in frequency of T-cells was measured.
Percentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 Strainup to day 43Measurement of immunogenicity in terms of significant increase in antibody titer and Seroconversion. Significant increase in antibody titer is defined as at least a four-fold increase from non-negative pre-vaccination serum (≥ 10) for HI or a 50% increase in area for SRH. Seroconversion is defined as negative pre-vaccination serum / post-vaccination titer ≥40 for HI (area ≥25 mm2 for SRH)

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 2 sites in Germany

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were included in the trial. The data entered is for the overall study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
T/P-A
one dose of the tetravalent (T) influenza vaccine administered concomitantly, in a different arm, with one dose of the placebo (P) control, on study day 1, followed by Aflunov, on study day 22
199
A/P-T
one dose of the Aflunov (A; A/H5N1) avian influenza vaccine administered concomitantly, in a different arm, with one dose of the placebo (P) control, on study day 1, followed by the tetravalent (T) influenza vaccine, on study day 22
203
A/S-A
one dose of the Aflunov (A; A/H5N1) avian influenza vaccine administered concomitantly, in a different arm, one dose of licensed seasonal(S) vaccine, on study day 1, followed by Aflunov (A), on study day 22
199
Total601

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event112
Overall StudyInappropriate enrolment001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up163
Overall StudyProtocol Violation121
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicT/P-ATotalA/S-AA/P-T
Age, Customized
≤60 years
196 participants
8
596 participants198 participants
9.6
202 participants
9.8
Age, Customized
≥ 61 Years
3 participants
1
4 participants0 participants1 participants
0
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (≤60 years of age)
126 participants369 participants114 participants129 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (≥61 years of age)
1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (≤60 years of age)
70 participants227 participants84 participants73 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (≥61 years of age)
2 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
190 / 199185 / 203183 / 198
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1993 / 2034 / 198

Outcome results

Primary

To Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.

The antibody response was determined by SRH assay. Geometric mean areas (GMAs) and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) in the SRH assay were used to demonstrate the equivalence. The statistical analysis was done based on the GMRs.

Time frame: up to day 43

Population: The analysis was done on Per Protocol Set (PPS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
T/P-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 22 (N= 31, 31, 30)14 Area (mm^2)
T/P-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 14.64 Area (mm^2)
T/P-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 43 (N=181, 189, 189)41 Area (mm^2)
A/P-TTo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 22 (N= 31, 31, 30)12 Area (mm^2)
A/P-TTo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 14.10 Area (mm^2)
A/P-TTo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 43 (N=181, 189, 189)35 Area (mm^2)
A/S-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 14.61 Area (mm^2)
A/S-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 43 (N=181, 189, 189)39 Area (mm^2)
A/S-ATo Demonstrate the Equivalence of Antibody Response Against A/H5N1 Strain Elicited by the Three Different Immunization Schedules on Day 43.Day 22 (N= 31, 31, 30)16 Area (mm^2)
Comparison: (On day 1) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [1.02, 1.25]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 1) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.91, 1.12]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 1)Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.8, 0.99]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 22) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.74, 1.93]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 22) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.52, 1.38]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 22) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.44, 1.15]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 43) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [1.01, 1.3]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 43) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.93, 1.19]ANOVA
Comparison: (On day 43) Null hypothesis representing non-equivalence was rejected if the two-sided (1-2α)\*100% CI on one GMA ratio is completely within the equivalence range \[0.5, 2.0\].96.67% CI: [0.81, 1.04]ANOVA
Secondary

Antibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.

Measurement of immunogenicity in terms of Geometric mean titers (GMTs) as determined by HI and MN assay.

Time frame: Up to 43 days

Population: The population was analyzed on Per protocol set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)8.36 titers
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 15.93 titers
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)46 titers
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)10 titers
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)14 titers
T/P-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)141 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)111 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 15.58 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)10 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)16 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)6.76 titers
A/P-TAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)33 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)9.66 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)49 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)10 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)133 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.HI-Day 15.85 titers
A/S-AAntibody Response Determined by HI and MN Assay.MN-Day 22 (N=31,31,30)17 titers
Secondary

Mean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 Subunit

Frequency and functionality of vaccine antigen-specific CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) T cells was assessed in peripheral blood (PBMC) taken at days 1, 22 and 43 after in vitro stimulation with: Library of 70 peptides spanning the whole H5 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 protein (H5 pool of 70 Vietnam) H5N1 subunit from A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1 Vietnam) H3N2 subunit from A/ Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2 Wisconsin) H1N1 subunit from A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1 Solomon Islands) Polyclonal stimulus agonistic aCD3 mAb \[monoclonal antibody (aCD3)\]. The change in frequency of T-cells was measured.

Time frame: Three weeks after 1st vaccination (day 22) and three weeks after 2nd vaccination (day 43)

Population: Analysis was done on full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)784 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)311 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)275 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)329 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)273 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)910 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)1050 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)162 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)38714 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)136 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)31001 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)930 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)604 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)29134 Mean cells per million total cells
T/P-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 22 (N=30, 30, 30)998 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)616 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)175 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)358 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)328 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)180 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)711 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)813 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)344 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)1034 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)427 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 22 (N=30, 30, 30)729 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)973 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)32703 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)27324 Mean cells per million total cells
A/P-TMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)29327 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)938 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)34680 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 22 (N=30, 30, 30)1040 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)155 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)32324 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)792 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)290 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)167 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)1129 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)349 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitaCD3 Day 1 (N=31, 31, 30)27824 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH3N2 Wisconsin Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)814 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5N1 Vietnam Day 43 (N=31, 31, 30)750 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH5 Pool of 70 Vietnam Day 22 (N=31, 31, 30)365 Mean cells per million total cells
A/S-AMean T-Cells Per Million Total Cells (95% CI) in Response to H5 Peptides and H5N1 SubunitH1N1 Solomon Islands Day 1 (N=30, 31, 30)331 Mean cells per million total cells
Secondary

Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First Vaccination

Local reactions were collected up to 7 days after 1st vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record local reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization. The table represents local reactions after first vaccination in each arm differently.

Time frame: Up to 7 days after 1st vaccination

Population: The analysis was performed on Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis2 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration22 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema10 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain164 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling19 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration1 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis1 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema0 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain30 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling1 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration5 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis2 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain138 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling6 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema5 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling0 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema0 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration0 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis0 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain32 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis2 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema6 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain131 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration9 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling7 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationErythema5 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationEcchymosis1 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationInduration3 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationPain80 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After First VaccinationSwelling3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second Vaccination

Local reactions were collected up to 7 days after 1st vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record local reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization.

Time frame: Up to 7 days after 2nd vaccination

Population: The analysis was performed on Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationEcchymosis3 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationSwelling5 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationErythema (N=188,192,191)2 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationInduration7 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationPain98 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationSwelling8 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationErythema (N=188,192,191)7 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationInduration10 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationEcchymosis3 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationPain136 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationPain91 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationEcchymosis2 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationErythema (N=188,192,191)5 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationSwelling6 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤60 Years) With Reported Local Reactions After Second VaccinationInduration7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.

Systemic reactions were collected upto 7 days after 1st and 2nd vaccinations. All subjects were instructed to complete a diary card to record systemic reactions starting on the day of vaccination (after 6 hours) and for each of the 6 days following each immunization.

Time frame: 7 days after 1st and 2nd vaccinations each

Population: The analysis was performed on Per Protocol Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]187 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)24 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)68 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)24 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)62 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions8 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]8 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)79 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)34 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)13 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)14 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)70 Participants
T/P-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used27 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)52 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)29 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)16 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]1 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)58 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)16 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions7 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)47 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)16 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used21 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]200 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)14 Participants
A/P-TNumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)8 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)52 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)16 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)8 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)28 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions2 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)42 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]192 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)12 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)43 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)9 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]3 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)10 Participants
A/S-ANumber of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used15 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)22 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)6 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)15 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)6 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)33 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)6 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)32 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)7 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)13 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]2 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]186 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions1 Participants
A/P-T: In Arm Receiving Placebo (P)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used6 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)12 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)13 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]5 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)50 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)53 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]187 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)15 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)38 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used16 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions8 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)16 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)60 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Aflunov (A)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)11 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Body Temp. (< 38C)[N=195,201,195,188,192,192]192 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Coughing (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)13 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Sweating (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)7 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Stayed home due to reactions1 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Headache (N=195, 201, 196, 187, 192, 192)27 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Arthralgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)6 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Malaise (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)15 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fever (>= 38 C) [N=195,201,195,188,192,192]0 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Chills (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)3 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Myalgia (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)27 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Nausea (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)6 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Analgesic, Antipyretic Medicines Used6 Participants
A/S-A: In Arm Receiving Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (S)Number of Subjects (Subjects ≤ 60 Years) With Reported Systemic Reactions After 1st and 2nd Vaccinations.Fatigue (N=195,201,196,187,192,192)35 Participants
Secondary

Percentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.

The Cell Mediated Immunity (CMI) response was evaluated in a randomly selected subgroup of approximately 92 subjects from all the vaccine groups out of a total of 601 enrolled subjects. Frequency of circulating memory B cells (MBC), capable of differentiating in vitro into cell secreting IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies specific for H5N1 (the subunit from A/Vietnam/1194/2004) or for H1N1 (the subunit from A/Solomon Island/3/2006) were determined by an ELISA-coupled limiting dilution assay.The frequency of H5N1-IgG MBC and H1N1-IgG MBC was expressed as percentages (%) of total IgG producing MBC.

Time frame: Three weeks after first vaccination (day 22) and three weeks after second vaccination (day 43)

Population: The analysis was done on Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)0.7 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)5.39 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)6.67 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)2.35 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)13 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
T/P-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)12 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)16 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)0.42 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)2.64 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)8.55 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)6.08 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/P-TPercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)7.21 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)7.58 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)6.84 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 43 (N=30, 30, 29)15 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)1.61 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H5N1-IgG MBC - Day 1 (N=30, 30, 29)0.53 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
A/S-APercentages of B-cell Antibodies Against H5N1 and H1N1 After Each Vaccination.H1N1-IgG MBC - Day 22 (N=30, 30, 28)15 Percentages of B-cell antibodies
Secondary

Percentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2

Measurement of immunogenicity in terms of percentage of subjects achieving a titre ≥ 40/area ≥ 25mm\^2 after immunization as determined by HI (Haemagglutination Inhibition), MN(Microneutralization) and SRH assay.

Time frame: Up to 43 days

Population: The analysis was done on Per Protocol Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)4 Percentages of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)93 Percentages of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 1 (N=192,198,193)2 Percentages of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)70 Percentages of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)1 Percentages of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)90 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)87 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)0 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)66 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)3 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)86 Percentages of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 1 (N=192,198,193)0 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)89 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 1 (N=192,198,193)2 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 43 (N=181,189,189)89 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2HI-Day 43 (N=181,187,186)74 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2SRH-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)4 Percentages of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving HI/MN ≥ 1:40 and SRH Area ≥ 25^mm2MN-Day 1 (N=194,202,198)3 Percentages of subjects
Secondary

Percentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 Strain

Measurement of immunogenicity in terms of significant increase in antibody titer and Seroconversion. Significant increase in antibody titer is defined as at least a four-fold increase from non-negative pre-vaccination serum (≥ 10) for HI or a 50% increase in area for SRH. Seroconversion is defined as negative pre-vaccination serum / post-vaccination titer ≥40 for HI (area ≥25 mm2 for SRH)

Time frame: up to day 43

Population: The population was analyzed on per protocol set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise HI (N=180,186,184)69 Percentage of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise SRH(N=181,189,189)90 Percentage of subjects
T/P-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainFour fold increase MN (N=181,189,189)90 Percentage of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise HI (N=180,186,184)67 Percentage of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise SRH(N=181,189,189)86 Percentage of subjects
A/P-TPercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainFour fold increase MN (N=181,189,189)86 Percentage of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise SRH(N=181,189,189)86 Percentage of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainFour fold increase MN (N=181,189,189)89 Percentage of subjects
A/S-APercentages of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion/Significant Increase in Antibody Titre/ Area as Measured by SRH and (HI) and at Least 4 Fold Rise in Titres by Micro-neutralization (MN) Assay-H5N1 StrainSeroconversion/significant rise HI (N=180,186,184)75 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026