Skip to content

The Measurement of Empathy and Its Efficacy in Psychotherapy

The Measurement of Empathy and Its Efficacy in Psychotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00620009
Acronym
EMPATHY
Enrollment
16
Registered
2008-02-21
Start date
2002-06-30
Completion date
2007-06-30
Last updated
2008-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychotherapeutic Processes, Transference (Psychology)

Keywords

Empathy, Feedback, Psychotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of the research is to: 1) to test whether psychotherapy including immediate feedback of empathy data is more efficacious than therapy without such an exchange of data, 2) to measure the degree of accuracy of therapist's empathy and its relationship to the patient's estimate of the therapist's empathy.

Detailed description

Objective: To develop and evaluate a feedback method for measuring and increasing therapists' empathic accuracy and reducing empathic errors in psychotherapy. Method: Sixteen (16) patient-therapist pairs were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. All patients rated their own functioning using the GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) and predicted the accuracy with which their therapists would estimate their ratings. Therapists rated the patient's GAF, predicted the patients' ratings of their own GAFs, and rated their confidence in their own predictions. In the intervention condition, therapist and patients discussed the previous session's ratings for a few minutes of the therapy session. Results: Intervention therapists showed greater empathic accuracy relative to controls on our empathy measure (t(14) = 2.69, p \< .01) and increased empathy over time on the Barrett-Lenard Empathy subscale (t(32) = 3.21, p \< .01). We also found significant effects on errors related to perceived accuracy of therapist empathy. Patients in the control group were found to perceive their therapists to be either more or less accurate than was actually the case (over/under-idealization), but such biases were not as strong in the intervention group. Similarly, therapists in the control group were likely to over-estimate their own accuracy (over-confidence) to a greater extent than intervention therapists. Affective responses to the instrument were positive overall and did not differ by condition. Conclusion: Empathy feedback and feedback concerning degrees of patient idealization and therapist confidence may be effective in improving functioning as well as in increasing empathic accuracy in psychotherapy.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEmpathy Feedback

Discussion of empathy ratings between patients and therapists during psychotherapy sessions.

Sponsors

University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatient psychotherapy at University of Illinois at Chicago * Age 18-65

Exclusion criteria

* Psychosis * Suicidality * Organic Brain Disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Global Assessment of Functioning20 psychotherapy sessions

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Barrett-Lenard Relationship InventoryEvery 5th session, 20 sessions of psychotherapy

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026