Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00619866
Enrollment
155
Registered
2008-02-21
Start date
2008-02-19
Completion date
2009-08-28
Last updated
2018-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis, Pain

Keywords

bone mineral density, Pelvic Pain, estradiol, NBI-56418

Brief summary

This study is designed to see how elagolix works compared to placebo in women with endometriosis and to see the effect, if any, on bone mineral density.

Detailed description

This is a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of elagolix at two dose levels administered once daily for up to 6 months. Participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to one of the following treatment groups for the first 12 weeks of dosing: 150 mg elagolix once daily (QD); 250 mg elagolix QD or placebo QD. Following 12 weeks of dosing, participants will continue in the study for an additional 12 weeks; participants randomized to elagolix will continue to receive their assigned dose and participants randomized to placebo will be re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix for 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Six weeks after the last dose of study drug at the end of Week 24, a follow-up visit will be performed (end of Week 30).

Interventions

DRUGElagolix

Elagolix tablets administered orally

DRUGplacebo

Placebo tablet administered orally

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be female, aged 18 to 49 years, inclusive * Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis * Have been surgically (laparoscopy) diagnosed with endometriosis within the last 8 years and have recurrent or persistent endometriosis symptoms * Have regular menstrual cycle * Have a body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 36 kg/m², inclusive * Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study

Exclusion criteria

* Are currently receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening * Are currently receiving subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) or have received any of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening * Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month * Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month * Have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy * Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months * Have uterine fibroids ≥ 3 cm in diameter * Have pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis * Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease * Have been pregnant within the last six months * Currently breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Baseline and week 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreBaseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or no pain) for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and weeks 4 and 8The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain. * 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain. * Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms.
Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8, and 12The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeeks 4, 8, and 12The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeeks 4, 8, and 12The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Baseline and week 12The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12Baseline and week 12Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12Baseline and week 12Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 50 centers in the United States from February 2008 to August 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Patients were randomized equally to oral elagolix 150 mg or 250 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. Thereafter, patients originally randomized to placebo were re-randomized to one of the two elagolix doses and patients originally randomized to elagolix continued their assigned dose for an additional 12 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) QD for 12 weeks.
52
Elagolix 150 mg
Participants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 150 mg QD for an additional 12 weeks.
51
Elagolix 250 mg
Participants received elagolix 250 mg tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 250 mg for an additional 12 weeks.
52
Total155

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Weeks 1 - 12Adverse Event01200
Weeks 1 - 12Lack of Efficacy32100
Weeks 1 - 12Lost to Follow-up40200
Weeks 1 - 12Non-compliance00100
Weeks 1 - 12Sponsor Decision01000
Weeks 1 - 12Withdrawal by Subject72400
Weeks 13 - 24Adverse Event00210
Weeks 13 - 24Lost to Follow-up03000
Weeks 13 - 24Non-compliance01100
Weeks 13 - 24Protocol Deviation00010
Weeks 13 - 24Withdrawal by Subject03222

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboElagolix 150 mgElagolix 250 mgTotal
Age, Continuous31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 Participants4 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
43 Participants42 Participants41 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants51 Participants52 Participants155 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 520 / 690 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 5231 / 6933 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 691 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12-0.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12-1.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12-1.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.231195% CI: [-0.81, 0.2]Repeated Measures Analysis of Covariance
Comparison: Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.152195% CI: [-0.86, 0.14]Repeated Measures Analysis of Covariance
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain. * 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain. * Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 12-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 8-0.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 4-0.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 12-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 4-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 8-0.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 12-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 4-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)Week 8-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Pain-11.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Control and Powerlessness-10.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Frustration with Treatment-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Emotional Wellbeing-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Social Support-18.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Self-image-9.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Work-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Relationship with Children-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Sexual Intercourse-9.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Medical Profession0.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Concerns with Infertility-9.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Social Support-25.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Self-image-18.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Frustration with Treatment-26.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Work-28.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Relationship with Children-25.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Pain-25.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Sexual Intercourse-23.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Control and Powerlessness-25.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Concerns with Infertility-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Emotional Wellbeing-17.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Medical Profession-17.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Concerns with Infertility-9.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Social Support-15.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Medical Profession-14.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Emotional Wellbeing-9.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Self-image-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Control and Powerlessness-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Sexual Intercourse-19.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.5
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Work-22.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Frustration with Treatment-23.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Pain-17.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12Relationship with Children-20.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 8-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 4-0.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 12-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 8-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 4-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 12-0.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 4-0.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 12-0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreWeek 8-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.028695% CI: [-0.54, -0.03]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.12195% CI: [-0.45, 0.05]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.002495% CI: [-0.68, -0.15]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.76, -0.22]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-0.72, -0.16]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in dysmenorrhea score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.8, -0.24]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score

Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 8-0.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 4-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 12-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 8-0.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 4-0.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 12-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 4-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 12-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreWeek 8-0.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.574495% CI: [-0.18, 0.1]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.72895% CI: [-0.17, 0.12]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.019595% CI: [-0.32, -0.03]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.558995% CI: [-0.19, 0.1]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.555895% CI: [-0.2, 0.11]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain score was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.712195% CI: [-0.18, 0.12]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-0.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-0.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-1.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.204195% CI: [-0.77, 0.17]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.337595% CI: [-0.69, 0.24]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.035495% CI: [-1.01, -0.04]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in in monthly mean values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.361895% CI: [-0.71, 0.26]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 8-0.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 4-0.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 12-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 8-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 4-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 12-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 4-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 12-0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresWeek 8-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.060395% CI: [-0.34, 0.01]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.185595% CI: [-0.29, 0.06]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-0.48, -0.12]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.100295% CI: [-0.33, 0.03]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.056895% CI: [-0.36, 0.01]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in total of non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.11995% CI: [-0.33, 0.04]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 12-1.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-1.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-1.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-1.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 12-2.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 12-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 4-1.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainWeek 8-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.79995% CI: [-1.01, 0.78]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 4. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.504295% CI: [-1.21, 0.59]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.145995% CI: [-1.63, 0.24]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 8. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.016395% CI: [-2.1, -0.21]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.020795% CI: [-2.13, -0.18]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis at week 12. Change from baseline in in monthly peak values of the NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of covariance model. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time, the treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for subject, and the baseline-by-time interaction, and the baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.003895% CI: [-2.42, -0.47]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 8-5.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 4-4.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 12-6.1 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.5
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 8-12.6 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.4
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 4-8.7 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 12-10.5 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 4-6.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.3
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 12-13.9 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.4
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic UseWeek 8-10.4 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 8-0.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 4-0.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 12-1.7 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 8-1.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 4-2.5 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 12-1.3 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.3
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 4-2.1 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 12-3.6 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.3
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic UseWeek 8-3.0 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 8-0.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 4-1.0 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 12-2.1 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.6
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 8-3.2 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 4-4.0 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 12-2.6 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.6
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 4-2.3 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.2
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 12-3.3 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.6
Elagolix 250 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic UseWeek 8-3.2 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.4
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 83.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 43.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 123.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 82.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 43.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 122.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 250 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 42.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 250 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 122.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 250 mgPatient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Week 82.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline26.350 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.71
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 430.513 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.435
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 835.057 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.135
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1234.439 percentage of daysStandard Error 5
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1261.658 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.717
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline14.340 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.154
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 856.952 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.016
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 443.411 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.775
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1266.186 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.336
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 439.475 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.509
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 867.411 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.19
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline21.086 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.21
Secondary

Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment

Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline34.939 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.831
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 442.986 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.229
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 846.228 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.777
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 1254.270 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.768
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 1253.836 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.077
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline36.821 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.041
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 854.967 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.291
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 445.469 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.968
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 1250.061 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.496
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 444.443 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.905
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentWeek 847.524 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.367
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline38.530 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.065
Secondary

Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline33.009 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.69
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 439.586 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.058
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 843.961 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.607
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1250.340 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.552
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1252.584 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.999
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline32.940 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.649
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 853.526 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.2
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 444.020 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.825
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 1249.409 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.494
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 443.230 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.844
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentWeek 847.108 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.38
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline35.967 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.815
Secondary

Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or no pain) for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 1247.431 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.955
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 435.252 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.118
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 840.861 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.671
PlaceboPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline27.600 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.588
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 436.401 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.606
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 843.780 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.114
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline25.380 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.564
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 1244.841 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.857
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 836.737 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.467
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline25.515 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.493
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 1241.760 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.796
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSWeek 432.355 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.604
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 854.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 438.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1260.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 860.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 443.1 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1263.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 447.1 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1260.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 851.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 838.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 430.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1236.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 843.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 435.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1247.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 431.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1257.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 848.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 836.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 421.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1236.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 845.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 437.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1245.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 425.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 1244.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRSWeek 838.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS

The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 811.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 411.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1223.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 417.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1234.1 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 419.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 1242.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRSWeek 836.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 867.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 454.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1260.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 891.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 462.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1288.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 480.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1282.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much ImprovedWeek 884.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1232.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 412.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 837.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1266.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 858.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 434.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 1262.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 860.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 250 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much ImprovedWeek 438.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12-0.283 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.851
Elagolix 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12-0.294 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.762
Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12-0.382 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.338
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-0.743 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.877
Elagolix 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-1.024 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.759
Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-0.924 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.198
Placebo / Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-0.076 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.362
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 120.375 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.091
Elagolix 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12-0.045 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.088
Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12-0.937 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.747
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-1.032 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.983
Elagolix 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-1.631 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.874
Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-0.692 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.724
Placebo / Elagolix 250 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 240.681 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026