Endometriosis, Pain
Conditions
Keywords
bone mineral density, Pelvic Pain, estradiol, NBI-56418
Brief summary
This study is designed to see how elagolix works compared to placebo in women with endometriosis and to see the effect, if any, on bone mineral density.
Detailed description
This is a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of elagolix at two dose levels administered once daily for up to 6 months. Participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to one of the following treatment groups for the first 12 weeks of dosing: 150 mg elagolix once daily (QD); 250 mg elagolix QD or placebo QD. Following 12 weeks of dosing, participants will continue in the study for an additional 12 weeks; participants randomized to elagolix will continue to receive their assigned dose and participants randomized to placebo will be re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix for 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Six weeks after the last dose of study drug at the end of Week 24, a follow-up visit will be performed (end of Week 30).
Interventions
Elagolix tablets administered orally
Placebo tablet administered orally
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Be female, aged 18 to 49 years, inclusive * Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis * Have been surgically (laparoscopy) diagnosed with endometriosis within the last 8 years and have recurrent or persistent endometriosis symptoms * Have regular menstrual cycle * Have a body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 36 kg/m², inclusive * Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study
Exclusion criteria
* Are currently receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening * Are currently receiving subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) or have received any of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening * Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month * Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month * Have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy * Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months * Have uterine fibroids ≥ 3 cm in diameter * Have pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis * Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease * Have been pregnant within the last six months * Currently breast feeding
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or no pain) for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none). |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none). |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none). |
| Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and weeks 4 and 8 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain. * 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain. * Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms. |
| Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse |
| Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse |
| Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse |
| Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | Baseline and Week 24 | Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | Baseline and Week 24 | Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). |
| Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at 50 centers in the United States from February 2008 to August 2009.
Pre-assignment details
Patients were randomized equally to oral elagolix 150 mg or 250 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. Thereafter, patients originally randomized to placebo were re-randomized to one of the two elagolix doses and patients originally randomized to elagolix continued their assigned dose for an additional 12 weeks.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) QD for 12 weeks. | 52 |
| Elagolix 150 mg Participants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 150 mg QD for an additional 12 weeks. | 51 |
| Elagolix 250 mg Participants received elagolix 250 mg tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 250 mg for an additional 12 weeks. | 52 |
| Total | 155 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Non-compliance | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Sponsor Decision | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 13 - 24 | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Weeks 13 - 24 | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 13 - 24 | Non-compliance | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Weeks 13 - 24 | Protocol Deviation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Weeks 13 - 24 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Elagolix 150 mg | Elagolix 250 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 31.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 | 30.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 | 31.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 | 31.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 43 Participants | 42 Participants | 41 Participants | 126 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 52 Participants | 51 Participants | 52 Participants | 155 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 52 | 0 / 69 | 0 / 72 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 52 | 31 / 69 | 33 / 72 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 52 | 0 / 69 | 1 / 72 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | -0.88 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | -1.19 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | -1.25 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse. * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain. * 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain. * Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 12 | -0.29 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 8 | -0.15 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 4 | -0.19 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 12 | -0.67 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 4 | -0.21 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 8 | -0.68 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 12 | -0.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 4 | -0.56 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) | Week 8 | -0.66 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Pain | -11.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Control and Powerlessness | -10.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Frustration with Treatment | -8.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Emotional Wellbeing | -6.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Social Support | -18.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Self-image | -9.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Work | -6.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Relationship with Children | -7.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Sexual Intercourse | -9.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Medical Profession | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Concerns with Infertility | -9.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Social Support | -25.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Self-image | -18.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Frustration with Treatment | -26.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Work | -28.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.9 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Relationship with Children | -25.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Pain | -25.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Sexual Intercourse | -23.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.9 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Control and Powerlessness | -25.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Concerns with Infertility | -5.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Emotional Wellbeing | -17.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Medical Profession | -17.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.9 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Concerns with Infertility | -9.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Social Support | -15.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.8 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Medical Profession | -14.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Emotional Wellbeing | -9.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.8 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Self-image | -10.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Control and Powerlessness | -22.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 4.8 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Sexual Intercourse | -19.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.5 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Work | -22.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Frustration with Treatment | -23.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Pain | -17.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12 | Relationship with Children | -20.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.2 |
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 8 | -0.29 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 4 | -0.20 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 12 | -0.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 8 | -0.71 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 4 | -0.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 12 | -0.68 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 4 | -0.40 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 12 | -0.76 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Week 8 | -0.79 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score
Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 8 | -0.12 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 4 | -0.14 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 12 | -0.22 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 8 | -0.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 4 | -0.18 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 12 | -0.27 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 4 | -0.16 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 12 | -0.25 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Week 8 | -0.17 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4 and 8
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -0.60 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -0.71 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -0.90 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -1.23 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -0.83 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -0.94 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 8 | -0.18 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 4 | -0.18 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 12 | -0.27 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 8 | -0.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 4 | -0.34 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 12 | -0.44 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 4 | -0.29 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 12 | -0.41 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Week 8 | -0.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 12 | -1.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -1.27 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -1.25 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -1.39 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 12 | -2.45 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -1.94 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 12 | -2.74 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 4 | -1.58 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Week 8 | -2.41 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -5.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -4.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -6.1 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -12.6 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -8.7 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -10.5 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -6.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -13.9 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.4 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -10.4 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.4 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -0.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -0.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -1.7 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -1.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -2.5 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -1.3 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -2.1 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -3.6 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -3.0 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -0.8 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -1.0 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -2.1 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -3.2 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -4.0 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -2.6 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 4 | -2.3 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 12 | -3.3 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use | Week 8 | -3.2 percentage of days | Standard Error 1.4 |
Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 8 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 4 | 3.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 12 | 3.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 8 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 4 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 12 | 2.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 4 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 12 | 2.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Week 8 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 26.350 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.71 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 30.513 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.435 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 35.057 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.135 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 34.439 percentage of days | Standard Error 5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 61.658 percentage of days | Standard Error 6.717 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 14.340 percentage of days | Standard Error 2.154 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 56.952 percentage of days | Standard Error 6.016 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 43.411 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.775 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 66.186 percentage of days | Standard Error 6.336 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 39.475 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.509 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 67.411 percentage of days | Standard Error 6.19 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 21.086 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.21 |
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment
Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline | 34.939 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.831 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 42.986 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.229 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 46.228 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.777 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 54.270 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.768 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 53.836 percentage of days | Standard Error 6.077 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline | 36.821 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.041 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 54.967 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.291 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 45.469 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.968 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 50.061 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.496 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 44.443 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.905 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 47.524 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.367 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline | 38.530 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.065 |
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (no pain) for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 33.009 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.69 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 39.586 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.058 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 43.961 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.607 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 50.340 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.552 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 52.584 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.999 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 32.940 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.649 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 53.526 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 44.020 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.825 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 12 | 49.409 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.494 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 4 | 43.230 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.844 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Week 8 | 47.108 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.38 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline | 35.967 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.815 |
Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or no pain) for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 12 | 47.431 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.955 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 4 | 35.252 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.118 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 8 | 40.861 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.671 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline | 27.600 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.588 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 4 | 36.401 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.606 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 8 | 43.780 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.114 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline | 25.380 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.564 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 12 | 44.841 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.857 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 8 | 36.737 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.467 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline | 25.515 percentage of days | Standard Error 3.493 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 12 | 41.760 percentage of days | Standard Error 5.796 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Week 4 | 32.355 percentage of days | Standard Error 4.604 |
Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 54.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 38.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 60.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 60.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 43.1 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 51.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 38.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 30.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 43.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 35.3 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 47.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 31.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 57.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 30% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 48.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 36.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 21.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 45.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 37.3 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 45.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 4 | 25.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 12 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Mean NRS | Week 8 | 38.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 11.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 11.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 23.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 17.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 4 | 19.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 12 | 42.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With 50% Decrease From Baseline in Monthly Peak NRS | Week 8 | 36.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 67.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 54.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 91.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 62.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 82.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 84.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 32.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 37.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 58.3 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 34.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 12 | 62.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 8 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved | Week 4 | 38.0 percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12 | -0.283 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.851 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12 | -0.294 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.762 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12 | -0.382 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.338 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -0.743 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.877 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -1.024 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.759 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -0.924 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.198 |
| Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -0.076 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.362 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12 | 0.375 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.091 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12 | -0.045 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.088 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12 | -0.937 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.747 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and with available BMD data at baseline and week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -1.032 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.983 |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -1.631 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.874 |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -0.692 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.724 |
| Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | 0.681 percent change | Standard Deviation 2.72 |