Skip to content

The Influence of MCIMT (Modified Constrained Induced Movement Therapy), Bilateral Intensive Treatment, and NDT Approach on the UL Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00619853
Acronym
CIMT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-02-21
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2008-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

Improving the assisting hand function in children with Hemiplegic Cerebral palsy

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare unimanual training (CIMT) and bimanual training (HABIT) protocols aimed to improve ability of the involved hand in children with hemiplegia. Both protocols were conducted in an educational setting for 2 hours a day for 2 months, one-hour group session and one-hour individual therapy session conducted by occupational therapists or assistants. The children in the CIMT group practiced various tasks using their involved hand with the contralateral hand constrained with a mitt. The children at the HABIT group practiced various bimanual tasks without constraint. Twelve children (2 - 6.5 yrs.) participated in this study. The inclusion criterion included minimal extension movement of the involved wrist, and for the CIMT group, the ability to of tolerates the mitt. The children were matched in relation to cognitive level and MACS score and randomly divided into the two intervention groups. Each child's assessment included the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), and the Blocks and Box for children above age 5 yrs old. Range of motion (ROM) was assessed using an electronic gonimeter, and muscle tone was recorded using surface EMG and the Tardiue scale. The Child Health Questioner (CHQ) was completed by the parents before, and 6 months after, the intervention. Children were assessed starting two month before, and two month after, the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALtreatment approach - CIMT

CIMT, 2 months, 2Hr per day

BEHAVIORALtreatment approach - HABIT

HABIT-2 months, 2Hr per day

Sponsors

Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children with Hemiplegia

Exclusion criteria

* No ability for a minimal extension movement in the wrist

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026