Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Tablets of Grass Pollen Allergen Extract

A Randomised, Double-blind, in Parallel Groups Placebo-controlled, Mono-centre, Phase I Study to Assess After Allergen Challenge in an Allergen Exposition Chamber the Effect and Its Time Course of Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Administered as 300IR Allergen-based Tablets Once Daily to Adults Suffering From Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00619827
Enrollment
89
Registered
2008-02-21
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2016-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Sublingual immunotherapy, Rhinitis, Conjunctivitis, Allergen challenge, Allergen exposition chamber, Grass pollen tablet, Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of grass pollen extract SLIT tablets on the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) of the six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms in response to grass pollen challenge after one week, one, two and four months of treatment in patients suffering from Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether SLIT tablets are effective on symptoms of allergic rhinitis compared to placebo in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis to grass pollen when exposed in an allergen chamber and also to determine the onset of action of SLIT tablets on allergic rhinitis symptoms.

Interventions

300 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet once daily during four months

DRUGPlacebo tablet

Placebo tablet once daily during four months

Sponsors

Stallergenes Greer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female outpatients 18-50 years old * grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis of at least 2 years. * positive specific skin prick test and a specific IgE dosage level of at least 0.70 kU/L at screening. * written consent * a positive response to the baseline challenge test (RTSS reaches 7 at one time-point at least during baseline challenge)

Exclusion criteria

* Allergic rhino-conjunctivitis due to a co-sensitisation, likely to significantly change the symptoms of the subject throughout the study * Asthma requiring treatment other than short-acting beta-2 inhaled agonists. * Desensitisation treatment for grass pollen in the previous five years and current immunotherapy with another allergen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) ]0-4] Hours4 monthsThe primary efficacy variable was the Average of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) during the four-hour (\]0-4\] hours) grass pollen allergen challenge at end point (after four months of treatment) of the 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes). The severity of each symptom was evaluated by the subject, before allergen exposure and every 15 minutes during allergen challenge on a scale of 0 to 3; 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms, 3: severe symptoms, total score range was 0 to 18. The ARTSS \]0-4\] hours was calculated as the mean of the RTSSs at each timepoint during the allergen challenge (i.e., 16 timepoints from 15 minutes to 4 hours) after 4 months of treatment (endpoint). The lower the score, the better the outcome.

Countries

Austria

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Patient First Visit 17 SEP 2007, Last Patient Last Visit 10 MAR 2008

Participants by arm

ArmCount
300 IR
300 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet
45
Placebo
Placebo tablet
44
Total89

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic300 IRPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous27.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.577
27.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.807
27.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.175
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants28 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 459 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Average of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) ]0-4] Hours

The primary efficacy variable was the Average of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) during the four-hour (\]0-4\] hours) grass pollen allergen challenge at end point (after four months of treatment) of the 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes). The severity of each symptom was evaluated by the subject, before allergen exposure and every 15 minutes during allergen challenge on a scale of 0 to 3; 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms, 3: severe symptoms, total score range was 0 to 18. The ARTSS \]0-4\] hours was calculated as the mean of the RTSSs at each timepoint during the allergen challenge (i.e., 16 timepoints from 15 minutes to 4 hours) after 4 months of treatment (endpoint). The lower the score, the better the outcome.

Time frame: 4 months

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
300 IRAverage of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) ]0-4] Hours4.88 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Error 0.363
PlaceboAverage of Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) ]0-4] Hours6.84 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Error 0.367
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-2.99, -0.94]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026