Skip to content

EMPOWIR:Enhance the Metabolic Profile of Women With Insulin Resistance

EMPOWIR: Enhance the Metabolic Profile of Women With Insulin Resistance: Carbohydrate Modified Diet Alone and in Combination With Metformin or Metformin Plus Avandia in Non-diabetic Women With Midlife Weight Gain and Documented Insulin Elevations (Syndrome W)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00618072
Acronym
EMPOWIR
Enrollment
46
Registered
2008-02-18
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2014-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperinsulinemia, Insulin Resistance, Obesity

Keywords

hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, perimenopause, obesity, overweight, women

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to identify and treat women with midlife weight gain who have normal blood sugars, but increased insulin levels (hyperinsulinemia) following the performance of a glucose tolerance test. The study will evaluate effects of a unique carbohydrate modified diet alone and in combination with metformin(MF) and Avandamet® (MF plus rosiglitazone (RSG)) on insulin levels in a wide range of ethnically diverse women (aged 35-55) at three academic medical centers. The primary study hypothesis is that insulin sensitizing medications, in combination with alterations in carbohydrate intake, will reduce insulin levels and improve established risk factors for the metabolic syndrome. The alarming prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and related comorbidities and the paucity of easily adopted, cost-effective preventive strategies for high risk populations, suggest that pharmaco-therapies and dietary regimens targeted to reducing insulin resistance could have important clinical and public health implications.

Detailed description

Progressive weight gain that starts in the fourth and fifth decades is commonly reported by women from all ethnic and socio-economic groups. Our previous data suggest that, in large and diverse subpopulations of healthy-appearing women this midlife weight gain may represent the earliest clinical manifestation of insulin resistance - demarcated by increased insulin response curves in the presence of completely normal glucose tolerance tests. We termed the disorder Syndrome W to highlight its defining triad of weight gain, waist gain and white-coat hypertension in women and its role as an alphabetic and chronologic antecedent to the better known Syndrome X. As in other disorders of insulin action in younger women, including Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), early adrenarche, and precocious puberty, Syndrome W is, presumably, a harbinger of The Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 diabetes at an early and optimal period for intervention. Preliminary data from our first pilot study suggested that metformin, in combination with a hypocaloric, low-fat, carbohydrate modified dietary program produced significant and sustainable weight loss in women with Syndrome W, with notable reductions in fasting insulin levels. These findings supported hypotheses that insulin elevation might be an antecedent, as well as a consequence, of weight gain, accounting for a progressive and intractable weight spiral as women transition from their forties to their sixties. Additional two to four year follow-up in an intention-to-treat analysis of consecutive women who lost ≥10% of their body weight after one year of the treatment regimen further suggests that this composite intervention prevents weight regain and the onset of overt glucose impairment. The protocol evolved from evaluation and treatment of several hundred patients seen in The Endocrine Faculty Practice over a ten year period and has been highly successful in a broad ethnic range of normo-glycemic, hyperinsulinemic subjects. These include midlife women with weight gain and overweight men with upper body obesity - populations which have not been comparably treated in prior studies which focus predominantly on subjects with discernible glycemic abnormalities. The magnitude and duration of the treatment effect suggest that more rigorous study should be undertaken with a randomized clinical trial. PPAR agonists including thiazolidinediones (TZD's) are a newer category of insulin sensitizers with increasingly wide and well-studied positive attributes, including redistribution of fat depots, increased adiponectin secretion, and reduction of inflammatory and proinflammatory markers. The combination of metformin and rosiglitazone (Avandamet®) is FDA-approved for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Previous clinical research and recent laboratory data suggest that the two categories of insulin sensitizers have independent and additive mechanisms of action that could target and, ultimately, modulate the underlying pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Comparison studies suggest that TZD's may have a greater insulin sensitizing action and provide greater reduction in hyperinsulinemia than metformin. However, due to increased adipocyte expression (and possible other mechanisms), weight gain is a common and undesirable side effect of TZD treatment. The addition of metformin to rosiglitazone, along with dietary strategies that reduce endogenous insulin production could prove an ideal therapeutic option to attenuate insulin resistance and preserve ß-cell function in high risk individuals. Early initiation of this dual regimen in normoglycemic subjects with documented hyperinsulinemia could have profound implications for Syndrome W women and for an additional 25% of the adult US population estimated to have other manifestations of The Metabolic Syndrome. The primary study question addressed is whether dual treatment regimens which modulate insulin action can reduce hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance in high risk, but healthy-appearing normoglycemic, hyperinsulinemic subjects identified because of progressive, intractable, midlife weight gain

Interventions

DRUGmetformin and rosiglitazone

4 week dosage escalation of metformin, 500 mg/day (or placebo) to a total dose of 2000mg/day; starting dose of rosiglitazone 2mg/day(or placebo) added at weeks 3 and weeks 4 to a a total dose of 4 mg/day

Sponsors

Albert Einstein College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Tennessee
CollaboratorOTHER
New York Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy, non-diabetic women with ≥20 pound weight gain since their twenties 2. Age: 35-55 3. Peri-menopausal or postmenopausal status 4. Body Mass Index (BMI) 25-35 kg/m2 5. Either: 1. a single blood pressure recording ≥135/85 or the use of blood pressure medication OR 2. HDL≤50mg/dl or triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl or the use of lipid modifying medication 6. Area-under-the-curve (AUC-)insulin level\>100mcgU/ml along with normal fasting (≤100 mg/dl) & postprandial ((≤200 mg/dl) glucose determinations following a 75-gram standard oral glucose tolerance test. \-

Exclusion criteria

1. known diabetes, fasting blood sugar ≥100 mg/dl or HbA-1-C≥6.0% 2. known hepatic disease or ALT\>40 3. known renal disease or creatinine ≥ 1.4 4. known severe pulmonary disease 5. chronic acidosis of any etiology 6. Congestive heart failure (NYS Category 1), treated or untreated 7. Cancer - active within 5 years 8. current alcoholism or other substance abuse 9. co-morbid psychiatric disorder, which in the opinion of the screening physician would require concomitant psychotherapy as part of obesity management 10. currently untreated thyroid abnormality (TSH≤0.2 or ≥4mIU/L) 11. pregnancy or contemplation of pregnancy 12. use of TZD or metformin within the past year 13. allergy to TZD or biguanide 14. use of FDA approved or alternate obesity agent within 6 months of the study 15. history of pseudotumor cerebri 16. other impairment, such as a history of medication noncompliance, which in the judgment of the screening clinician, would preclude active study participation. 17. history of known or suspected heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fasting Insulin6 monthsInsulin was determined with a Siemens Immulite assay with respective intra-and inter-CV's 5.7 and 5.9%, and no cross reactivity to pro-insulin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HOMA-IR6 monthsHOMA-IR was calculated by the formula: fasting insulin (uU/mL) times fasting glucose (mg/L) divided by 22.5.
Waist Circumference6 months
Systolic BP6 monthsBlood pressure was assessed using NCEP guidelines.
Body Weight6 monthsBody weight measurement was performed three times and averaged by a single study coordinator.
HDL6 monthsHDL was measured using two reagents homogeneous systems with selective detergents to homogenize the lipoprotein of interest.
Triglycerides6 monthsTriglycerides were measured by enzymatic immunoassay on an AU400 chemistry auto-analyzer with commercially available enzymatic reagents.
Adiponectin6 monthsTotal adiponectin was measured with a commercial ELISA kit (Millipore/Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) in the laboratory of Dr. Philipp Scherer.
Diastolic BP6 monthsBlood pressure was assessed using NCEP guidelines.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled from December 2007 until November 2010. The study was conducted at two academic medical centers: Montefiore Hospital/Einstein, Bronx, and Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY in conjunction with the GCRC at Einstein.

Pre-assignment details

Prior to randomization, subjects attended 4 weekly workshops to introduce study instruments & the EMPOWIR diet -a food exchange program promoting intake of vegetables, low-glycemic index fruits, low-fat protein & dairy products, elimination of added sugars & the notable restriction of 3 additional allowable carbohydrates to after 4PM.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A: EMPOWIR Diet and Placebo
EMPOWIR dietary intervention food exchange program; 40-45% carbohydrates, 35-40% protein, and 20% fat AND 4 week dosage escalation of placebo metformin, 500 mg/day to a total dose of 2000mg/day; starting dose of placebo rosiglitazone 2mg/day added at weeks 3 and weeks 4 to a total dose of 4 mg/day
16
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo Avandia
EMPOWIR dietary intervention food exchange program; 40-45% carbohydrates, 35-40% protein, and 20% fat AND 4 week dosage escalation of metformin, 500 mg/day to a total dose of 2000mg/day; starting dose of placebo rosiglitazone 2mg/day added at weeks 3 and weeks 4 to a total dose of 4 mg/day
15
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Avandia
EMPOWIR dietary intervention food exchange program; 40-45% carbohydrates, 35-40% protein, and 20% fat AND 4 week dosage escalation of metformin, 500 mg/day to a total dose of 2000mg/day; starting dose of rosiglitazone 2mg/day added at weeks 3 and weeks 4 to a total dose of 4 mg/day
15
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up203
Overall StudyPhysician Decision011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboB: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaC: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaTotal
Adiponectin9.3 ug/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
10.6 ug/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
11.1 ug/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
10.6 ug/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants15 Participants15 Participants46 Participants
Body Weight84.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
85.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
81.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
82.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63
Diastolic BP75.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
75.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
76.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
75.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Fasting insulin11.2 uIU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
12.5 uIU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
8.7 uIU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
10.7 uIU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
HDL49.3 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
61.6 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
60.1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
58.9 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
HOMA-IR2.3 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
2.5 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
1.9 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
2.3 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants15 participants15 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants15 Participants15 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Systolic BP117.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
114.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
118.7 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
118.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
Triglycerides90.1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
88.0 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
82.6 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
86.9 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Waist circumference97.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
92.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
93.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
94.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 160 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Fasting Insulin

Insulin was determined with a Siemens Immulite assay with respective intra-and inter-CV's 5.7 and 5.9%, and no cross reactivity to pro-insulin.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The final data-set consisted of 44 study participants, after exclusion of two study completers due to clinical conditions which appeared de novo (asthma requiring high dose prednisone and growth hormone deficiency diagnosed mid-study) - applicable to all study outcomes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboFasting Insulin8.1 uIU/mLStandard Error 1.3
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaFasting Insulin8.0 uIU/mLStandard Error 1.2
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaFasting Insulin6.3 uIU/mLStandard Error 0.9
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.181Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.026Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.063Paired t-test
Secondary

Adiponectin

Total adiponectin was measured with a commercial ELISA kit (Millipore/Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) in the laboratory of Dr. Philipp Scherer.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboAdiponectin10.6 ug/mLStandard Error 1.2
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaAdiponectin10.9 ug/mLStandard Error 1.7
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaAdiponectin18.5 ug/mLStandard Error 1.5
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.092Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.73Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: <0.001Paired t-test
Secondary

Body Weight

Body weight measurement was performed three times and averaged by a single study coordinator.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboBody Weight80.0 kgStandard Error 2.7
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaBody Weight80.4 kgStandard Error 2.1
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaBody Weight77.5 kgStandard Error 4
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.049Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.002Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.032Paired t-test
Secondary

Diastolic BP

Blood pressure was assessed using NCEP guidelines.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboDiastolic BP71.7 mmHgStandard Error 2.3
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaDiastolic BP72.7 mmHgStandard Error 2.3
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaDiastolic BP74.3 mmHgStandard Error 3.8
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.025Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.162Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.562Paired t-test
Secondary

HDL

HDL was measured using two reagents homogeneous systems with selective detergents to homogenize the lipoprotein of interest.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboHDL56.5 mg/dlStandard Error 3.5
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaHDL70.1 mg/dlStandard Error 5.8
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaHDL68.3 mg/dlStandard Error 6.2
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.016Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.03Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.15Paired t-test
Secondary

HOMA-IR

HOMA-IR was calculated by the formula: fasting insulin (uU/mL) times fasting glucose (mg/L) divided by 22.5.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboHOMA-IR1.5 HOMA-IR scoreStandard Error 0.1
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaHOMA-IR1.6 HOMA-IR scoreStandard Error 0.3
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaHOMA-IR1.3 HOMA-IR scoreStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.142Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.054Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.013Paired t-test
Secondary

Systolic BP

Blood pressure was assessed using NCEP guidelines.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboSystolic BP113.8 mmHgStandard Error 2.9
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaSystolic BP107.2 mmHgStandard Error 3
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaSystolic BP114.2 mmHgStandard Error 4.7
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.265Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.001Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.389Paired t-test
Secondary

Triglycerides

Triglycerides were measured by enzymatic immunoassay on an AU400 chemistry auto-analyzer with commercially available enzymatic reagents.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboTriglycerides95.2 mg/dlStandard Error 10.7
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaTriglycerides103.1 mg/dlStandard Error 13
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaTriglycerides109.2 mg/dlStandard Error 18.3
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.648Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.094Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.054Paired t-test
Secondary

Waist Circumference

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: EMPOWIR Diet and PlaceboWaist Circumference93.1 cmStandard Error 2.1
B: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and Placebo AvandiaWaist Circumference90.4 cmStandard Error 1.9
C: EMPOWIR Diet Plus Metformin and AvandiaWaist Circumference87.5 cmStandard Error 3.2
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.052Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.143Paired t-test
Comparison: Paired t-tests were used to compare within-group mean differences at baseline and at 6 months following randomization for each of the 3 comparator groups.p-value: 0.005Paired t-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026