Skip to content

Factors Predicting Response to Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Factors Predicting Response to Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00613886
Acronym
NPH
Enrollment
24
Registered
2008-02-13
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2021-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Keywords

NPH, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Brief summary

The research project is designed to determine which combination of tests will enable physicians to predict whether a patient with symptoms of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) will improve with a shunt.

Detailed description

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a potentially reversible progressive neurological condition disproportionately affecting the elderly population. Given current controversies regarding its exact definition, accurate incidence and prevalence figures are elusive. NPH was first described forty years ago as a triad of symptoms consisting of gait difficulties, urinary incontinence, and memory problems in patients with enlarged ventricles in the absence of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). The cause of primary, or idiopathic NPH (INPH) remains elusive, while secondary NPH results from intracranial insults such as head trauma, meningitis, or intracranial hemorrhage. NPH can be successfully treated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting. However, the accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients with NPH remains problematic, despite significant advances in brain imaging and ICP physiology. Objectives - The primary aims of this study are: 1. to confirm the ability of external lumbar drainage to increase the success rate of selectively shunting patients with NPH compared to historical controls 2. to refine the diagnosis of NPH by determining whether the factors that change before and after lumbar drainage will predict failure to improve after shunting. A related aim is to assess the complications attributable to lumbar drainage. 3. to perform a preliminary evaluation of programmable shunt valves for NPH compared to historical controls using fixed-pressure valves. A related aim is to determine whether post-op objective analysis of gait, cognitive function and urinary symptoms will help refine the programmable shunt setting on an individual basis. Secondary study aims include: Investigating the pathophysiology of NPH by: 1) correlating cortical vein compliance measured by MRI flow quantification studies with CSF pressure waveform analysis; 2)assessing funduscopic changes before and during ELD; 3) performing and cross correlating CSF chemical analysis on screening positive and negative patients as well as screening-positive patients who are shunt responsive versus unresponsive.

Interventions

DEVICEProgrammable Shunt Insertion (Codman, Medtronic)

Medical Device - Shunt insertion surgery of adjustable valve and laparoscopic assistance for placement of peritoneal catheter. Patient will be brought to operating room suite where general anesthesia is induced. Patient will be placed with a small roll on shoulder, supine, on the operating room table. Patient's head will be turned with the parietal area uppermost in the field. Patient will be prepared and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Site prep includes parietooccipital area, side of neck, chest, and entire abdomen. Ventricular catheter placed and then attached to shunt valve. Catheter is then fitted over grooved blue burr hole guide. Excess catheter pulled down to pull valve into pocket on the skull. Sterile dressings applied.

BEHAVIORALAssessments in physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy

Follow-up testing to be administered by trained Physician Assistant in the outpatient setting on an approximately monthly basis: 10m walk, timed up-and-go, Mini-Mental Status Exam, 9-hole Grooved Pegboard, Motor Visual Perception Test (MVPT), Modified Rankin Score (MRS)

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Walking difficulties in both legs which has developed gradually, not explained by other conditions, either in combination with mental impairment and urinary incontinence * Brain CT or MRI findings of enlarged ventricles compared to established standards (minimum Evans ratio of 0.30 as measured by reviewing films) * Mental impairment must be mild to moderate, emerging with or after the walking difficulties * Age \> or = 18 years old * MMSE (Mini-mental status exam): \< or = 10 * Urinary incontinence

Exclusion criteria

* No or only minimal walking difficulties combined with severe dementia * Severe medical problems with limited life expectancy (less than six months) * Contraindications to surgery * Lack of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evans Ratioinitial and follow-up visitsA brain CT scan is obtained after the first week to ten days and the shunt is adjusted according to the patients signs and symptoms. Prior to any downward adjustment of the shunt valve (which allows more CSF drainage), a brain CT is obtained to look for subdural hematoma or effusion. If any type of subdural collection is found, the valve pressure is increased (to reduce CSF flow) until the collection resolves.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy30 min per clinic visitThe evaluations for physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy are performed along with external lumbar drainage (ELD) to assess NPH subjects.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjective Comparisons Made for Patients - Before and After ex
Programmable Shunt Insertion (Codman, Medtronic): Medical Device - Shunt insertion surgery of adjustable valve and laparoscopic assistance for placement of peritoneal catheter. Patient will be brought to operating room suite where general anesthesia is induced. Patient will be placed with a small roll on shoulder, supine, on the operating room table. Patient's head will be turned with the parietal area uppermost in the field. Patient will be prepared and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Site prep includes parietooccipital area, side of neck, chest, and entire abdomen. Ventricular catheter placed and then attached to shunt valve. Catheter is then fitted over grooved blue burr hole guide. Excess catheter pulled down to pull valve into pocket on the skull. Sterile dressings applied. Assessments in physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy:
24
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjective Comparisons Made for Patients - Before and After ex
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Evans Ratio

A brain CT scan is obtained after the first week to ten days and the shunt is adjusted according to the patients signs and symptoms. Prior to any downward adjustment of the shunt valve (which allows more CSF drainage), a brain CT is obtained to look for subdural hematoma or effusion. If any type of subdural collection is found, the valve pressure is increased (to reduce CSF flow) until the collection resolves.

Time frame: initial and follow-up visits

Population: Insufficient number of participants were recruited to conduct qualitative analysis. The PI ended recruitment and left the university therefore no study data was produced.

Secondary

Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy

The evaluations for physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy are performed along with external lumbar drainage (ELD) to assess NPH subjects.

Time frame: 30 min per clinic visit

Population: Insufficient number of subjects recruited for significant analysis. The PI ended recruitment and left the university therefore no study data was produced.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026