Skip to content

Combination Chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients Undergoing Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A Phase II Evaluation of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Utilizing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00613080
Enrollment
79
Registered
2008-02-12
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

stage III rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the rectum

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Giving these treatments before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving chemotherapy after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving combination chemotherapy together with intensity-modulated radiation therapy works in treating patients undergoing surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine whether the incidence of neoadjuvant acute gastrointestinal toxicity (grade ≥ 2) associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is reduced by inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based radiation treatment when compared with conventionally delivered radiotherapy, as was utilized in the capecitabine and oxaliplatin arm of RTOG-0247 (NCT00081289). Secondary * To evaluate the feasibility of performing IMRT in a cooperative group setting for the treatment of rectal cancer. * To estimate the incidence of all toxicity (hematologic and non-hematologic) associated with protocol treatment in the neoadjuvant period, the adjuvant period, and overall. * To estimate the pathologic complete response rate following neoadjuvant IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy. * To estimate the time to treatment failure and patterns of failure. * To correlate pre- and post-treatment levels of serum cytokines with symptoms during and pathological outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. * To evaluate the rate of abdominoperineal resections. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. * Chemoradiotherapy: Patients undergo inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the pelvis once daily, 5 days a week, for 5 weeks (total of 45 Gy) and a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy boost to gross disease once daily for 3 days (total of 45 Gy). Beginning on the first day of radiotherapy and continuing through completion of radiotherapy, patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily, 5 days a week, for 5 weeks and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29. * Surgery: Within 4-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients undergo resection of the rectal tumor. * Adjuvant chemotherapy: Beginning 4-8 weeks after surgery, patients with completely resected disease and negative surgical margins receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV bolus on day 1 and fluorouracil IV infusion continuously over 46 hours beginning on day 1 . Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months after the start of treatment for 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5, and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGcapecitabine

1650 mg/m\^2/day orally 5 days/week during radiotherapy.

DRUGoxaliplatin
PROCEDUREresection

All patients undergo surgery 4 to 8 weeks following the completion of radiation therapy. The choice of procedure (abdominoperineal resection (APR), low anterior resection (LAR), or LAR/coloanal anastomosis) is at the discretion of the surgeon.

RADIATIONradiation therapy

Pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): 45 Gy in 25 fx Three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) boost: 5.4 Gy in 3 fx to total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fx

DRUGFOLFOX

Postoperative chemotherapy is administered to all patients who have a complete resection of rectal cancer with negative surgical margins and begins within 4-8 weeks following surgical resection, consisting of a total of 9 14-day cycles. Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2, IV over 2 hours, day 1. Leucovorin 400 mg/m\^2, IV over 2 hours, day 1. 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m\^2, IV push, day 1. 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m\^2, IV continuous infusion over 46 hours, day 1.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
NRG Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum by biopsy technique that does not completely excise the lesion (e.g., fine needle aspiration, core needle biopsy) * Located up to 12 cm from the anal verge with no extension of malignant disease into the anal canal * Clinically determined to be stage T3 or T4,N0-N2, and M0 tumor as determined by the following assessments: * Colonoscopy and biopsy within 56 days prior to registration * History/physical examination (including medication history screen for contraindications) within 56 days prior to registration * Contrast-enhanced imaging of the abdomen and pelvis either by computed tomography(CT), MRI, or Positron-emission tomography(PET)-CT (whole body preferred) within 56 days prior to registration * Chest x-ray (or CT) of the chest within within 56 days prior to registration to exclude distant metastases (except for patients who have had whole body PET-CT) * Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) within 56 days prior to registration required to establish tumor stage * TRUS not required if clinical exam, CT of the pelvis, and/or MRI demonstrates T4 lesion * No synchronous primary colon carcinoma * No evidence of distant metastases (M1) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Inclusion criteria: * Zubrod performance status 0-2 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,800/mm³ * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³ * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL (transfusion or other intervention to achieve hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL allowed) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alkaline phosphatase \< 2.5 times ULN * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN * Creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No prior invasive malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* Severe, active comorbidity, defined as follows: * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the past 12 months * Transmural myocardial infarction within the past 6 months * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy within the past 30 days * Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects * AIDS * Evidence of uncontrolled seizures, central nervous system disorders, or psychiatric disability judged by the investigator to be clinically significant, precluding informed consent, or interfering with compliance of oral drug intake * Known, existing uncontrolled coagulopathy, unless clinically stable on anticoagulation therapy for ≥ 2 weeks * Evidence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 * Prior allergic reaction to oxaliplatin or capecitabine * Lack of physical integrity of the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., severe Crohn disease that results in malabsorption; significant bowel resection that would make one concerned about the absorption of capecitabine) or malabsorption syndrome that would preclude feasibility of oral chemotherapy (i.e., capecitabine) * Prior systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (prior chemotherapy allowed provided it was for a cancer other than colorectal cancer) * Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiotherapy fields * Major surgery within 28 days of study enrollment(other than diverting colostomy without tumor resection) * Participation in any investigational drug study within 28 days of study enrollment. * Concurrent cimetidine, amifostine, and/or depot Sandostatin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Patients Experiencing Treatment-related Gastrointestinal Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 3.0, Occurring PreoperativelyFrom start of treatment to surgery or ≤ 90 days from the Start of Concurrent Treatment (for patients not undergoing surgery)The percentage of patients experiencing preoperative treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events ≥ grade 2. If patient did not receive surgery, then such adverse events \<= 90 days from the start of concurrent treatment are included.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Pathologic Complete ResponseAt the time of surgery, which is 4-8 weeks after radiation therapy, approximately 9-13 weeks from treatment start.Pathologic complete response is defined as no evidence of residual cancer histologically in the resection specimen.
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0From study registration to end of follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 5.2 years.Grade refers to the severity of the adverse event (AE). The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Adverse events were compiled in four different time periods: 1) Preoperative: Preoperatively or, if no surgery, then ≤ 90 days from the Start of Concurrent Treatment; 2) Postoperative#1: Postoperatively and ≤ 30 days from the Date of Surgery; 3) Postoperative#2: Postoperatively and ≤ 90 days from the End of Postoperative Chemotherapy; 4) Overall: From start of concurrent treatment to end of follow-up;
Local-regional Failure: 4-year RateFrom registration to four yearsLocal failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence or surgery to the primary site after a complete response (CR) reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence \[failure at one day post study entry\], absence of CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Regional failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence after a nodal CR reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence, absence of nodal CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Local-regional failure time is defined as time from registration to local or regional failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Local-regional failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method.
Number of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningPretreatmentReal-time quality assurance was performed remotely by the study chair or the radiation oncology co-chair prior to initiation of treatment for the first 40 cases. The final cases enrolled were reviewed within 3 months after accrual was completed. Review included evaluation of clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV), Organs at Risk (OARs), and treatment plan dosimetry.
Overall Survival: 4-year RateFrom registration to four yearsOverall survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact.
Disease-free Survival: 4-year RateFrom registration to four yearsDisease is defined as local-regional failure or distant failure. Distant failure is defined as the appearance of peritoneal seeding or distant metastases. Local-regional failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence or surgery to the primary site after a complete response (CR) / any recurrence after a nodal CR - reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence \[failure at one day post study entry\], absence of primary/nodal CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of disease, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Patients Who Underwent Abdominoperineal ResectionSurgery occurred 4 to 8 weeks following the completion of radiation therapy, approximately 9-13 weeks from start of treatment.All patients were to undergo surgery 4 to 8 weeks following the completion of radiation therapy. The choice of procedure (abdominoperineal resection (APR), low anterior resection (LAR), or LAR/coloanal anastomosis) was at the discretion of the surgeon. If more than 28 patients received abdominoperineal resection, this would result in a conclusion of an excessive number of abdominoperineal resections.
Distant Failure: 4-year RateFrom registration to four yearsDistant failure is defined as the appearance of peritoneal seeding or distant metastases. Time to distant failure is defined as time from registration to the date of distant failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Distant failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative Chemotherapy
Radiation therapy (intensity modulated radiation therapy \[IMRT\] + three dimensional conformal radiation therapy \[3D-CRT\]) + neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) followed by resection and postoperative chemotherapy (FOLFOX)
68
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIneligible / no protocol treatment11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative Chemotherapy
Age, Continuous51 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
67 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Patients Experiencing Treatment-related Gastrointestinal Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 3.0, Occurring Preoperatively

The percentage of patients experiencing preoperative treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events ≥ grade 2. If patient did not receive surgery, then such adverse events \<= 90 days from the start of concurrent treatment are included.

Time frame: From start of treatment to surgery or ≤ 90 days from the Start of Concurrent Treatment (for patients not undergoing surgery)

Population: Eligible subjects who started study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyThe Percentage of Patients Experiencing Treatment-related Gastrointestinal Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 3.0, Occurring Preoperatively51 percentage of patients
Comparison: This study was designed for a one-sided chi-square test to detect at least 12% reduction in the 40% rate of ≥ grade 2 treatment-related preoperative GI AEs from the conventional radiotherapy / capecitabine /oxaliplatin arm of study RTOG-0247 (NCT00081289) with 80% power and a one-sided type I error rate of 0.10.p-value: 0.93Chi-squared
Secondary

Disease-free Survival: 4-year Rate

Disease is defined as local-regional failure or distant failure. Distant failure is defined as the appearance of peritoneal seeding or distant metastases. Local-regional failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence or surgery to the primary site after a complete response (CR) / any recurrence after a nodal CR - reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence \[failure at one day post study entry\], absence of primary/nodal CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of disease, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From registration to four years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyDisease-free Survival: 4-year Rate60.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Distant Failure: 4-year Rate

Distant failure is defined as the appearance of peritoneal seeding or distant metastases. Time to distant failure is defined as time from registration to the date of distant failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Distant failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method.

Time frame: From registration to four years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyDistant Failure: 4-year Rate29.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Local-regional Failure: 4-year Rate

Local failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence or surgery to the primary site after a complete response (CR) reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence \[failure at one day post study entry\], absence of CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Regional failure is defined as: (1) any recurrence after a nodal CR reported at surgery or reported after the end of protocol treatment; or (2) persistence, absence of nodal CR after protocol treatment was completed and patient lived at least 90 days from the end of treatment. Local-regional failure time is defined as time from registration to local or regional failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Local-regional failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method.

Time frame: From registration to four years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyLocal-regional Failure: 4-year Rate7.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Planning

Real-time quality assurance was performed remotely by the study chair or the radiation oncology co-chair prior to initiation of treatment for the first 40 cases. The final cases enrolled were reviewed within 3 months after accrual was completed. Review included evaluation of clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV), Organs at Risk (OARs), and treatment plan dosimetry.

Time frame: Pretreatment

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Contouring scorePer Protocol58 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Contouring scoreAcceptable variation5 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Contouring scoreUnacceptable variation5 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Contouring scoreUnacceptable variation0 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Dose volume analysis scorePer Protocol59 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Dose volume analysis scoreAcceptable variation8 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningTumor volume: Dose volume analysis scoreUnacceptable variation1 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Dose volume analysis scorePer Protocol48 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Dose volume analysis scoreAcceptable variation17 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Dose volume analysis scoreUnacceptable variation3 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Contouring scorePer Protocol62 Participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients in Protocol Adherence Categories for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) PlanningOrgans at risk: Contouring scoreAcceptable variation6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Underwent Abdominoperineal Resection

All patients were to undergo surgery 4 to 8 weeks following the completion of radiation therapy. The choice of procedure (abdominoperineal resection (APR), low anterior resection (LAR), or LAR/coloanal anastomosis) was at the discretion of the surgeon. If more than 28 patients received abdominoperineal resection, this would result in a conclusion of an excessive number of abdominoperineal resections.

Time frame: Surgery occurred 4 to 8 weeks following the completion of radiation therapy, approximately 9-13 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: Eligible patients that had surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients Who Underwent Abdominoperineal Resection14 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response

Pathologic complete response is defined as no evidence of residual cancer histologically in the resection specimen.

Time frame: At the time of surgery, which is 4-8 weeks after radiation therapy, approximately 9-13 weeks from treatment start.

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyNumber of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response10 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival: 4-year Rate

Overall survival time is defined as time from registration to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From registration to four years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyOverall Survival: 4-year Rate82.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0

Grade refers to the severity of the adverse event (AE). The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Adverse events were compiled in four different time periods: 1) Preoperative: Preoperatively or, if no surgery, then ≤ 90 days from the Start of Concurrent Treatment; 2) Postoperative#1: Postoperatively and ≤ 30 days from the Date of Surgery; 3) Postoperative#2: Postoperatively and ≤ 90 days from the End of Postoperative Chemotherapy; 4) Overall: From start of concurrent treatment to end of follow-up;

Time frame: From study registration to end of follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 5.2 years.

Population: For the four time periods reported, respectively: all registered patients; patients that had surgery; patients that had surgery and postoperative chemotherapy; all registered patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyPercentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0Postoperative #17 percentage of participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyPercentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0Postoperative #274 percentage of participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyPercentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0Preoperative49 percentage of participants
IMRT + Chemotherapy , Resection, Postoperative ChemotherapyPercentage of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0Overall78 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026