Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, Macular Edema
Conditions
Keywords
Branch retinal vein occlusion; treatment
Brief summary
Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular disease occurring in a significant number of individuals older than 50 years.The most common cause of visual disturbance in BRVO patients is macular edema, which has been reported in 60% of patients. Macular grid laser photocoagulation has been shown to be effective in the treatment of macular edema arising from BRVO. Some eyes are resistant to conventional grid laser treatment, and the conventional treatment is not useful in patients with intraretinal hemorrhages that may interfere with laser photocoagulation. Moreover, several studies have shown that conventional grid laser treatment for macular edema may be associated with complications. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection has recently been reported to be effective in the treatment of macular edema of various etiologies.On the other hand, arteriovenous sheathotomy is a surgical method suggested for treatment of macular edema in BRVO patients, and has been reported to be efficacious in patients refractory to conventional focal or grid laser macular photocoagulation.Both treatment modalities have been reported to be associated with reductions in central macular thicknesses and improved visual acuities. The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacies of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) injection in the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
Interventions
PROCEDUREArteriovenous Crossing Sheathotomy
In each sheathotomy patient, a standard pars plana vitrectomy is performed, followed by surgical separation of the posterior cortical vitreous from the optic nerve and posterior retina. After the relevant arteriovenous crossing site is identified based on preoperative FA, a bent microvitreoretinal blade is used to open the internal limiting membrane and the nerve fiber layer over the artery, with the incision commencing 100-200 micrometer proximal to the AV crossing. The incision is continued parallel to and under the retinal arteriole, with a gentle lifting motion, until the common AV crossing sheath is encountered and incised in a side-to-side manner. The completion of AV dissection is confirmed by an elevation of the overlying artery.
PROCEDUREIntravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection
The IVTA group receive intravitreal injection of 4 mg/0.1 mL triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL; Tamceton®; Hanall Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea). The injections are performed using 0.5% proparacaine drops (Alcaine®; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) for topical anesthesia under sterile conditions. The drug is injected through the inferotemporal pars plana using a 30-gauge needle. The correct intravitreal localization of the suspension, and perfusion of the optic nerve head, are then confirmed by indirect ophthalmoscopy.
Sponsors
Yonsei University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* recent onset (within the 6 months prior to enrollment) of macular edema resulting from BRVO * best corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores ≤ 40 letters (Snellen equivalent ≤ 20/40 * intraretinal hemorrhages involving the foveal centers * generalized breakdown of the inner blood-retina barrier, as documented by diffuse fluorescein leakage on angiography, or diffuse thickening of the retina on optical coherence tomography (OCT), with involvement of the foveal center and most of the macular area, and with foveal thicknesses ≥ 250 micrometer
Exclusion criteria
* prior history of intraocular surgery including cataract extraction * prior history of laser treatments including panretinal photocoagulation and focal/grid macular photocoagulation * prior history of elevated intraocular pressure secondary to steroid treatment * prior history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension * presence of comorbid ocular conditions that might affect visual acuity (VA).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity score | baseline, at 1,3,6 months after either treatment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| complication rate | at 1,3,6 months after either treatment |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed