Skip to content

Ph II Letrozole + OSI-774 (Tarceva) in Post-menopausal, w/ ER and/or PR-positive Met Breast Cancer.

A Phase II Trial of Letrozole Plus OSI-774 (Tarceva) in Post-menopausal Women With ER and/or PR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00611715
Enrollment
48
Registered
2008-02-11
Start date
2003-11-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2012-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

recurrent breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Hormone therapy using letrozole may fight breast cancer by blocking the use of estrogen by the tumor cells. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving letrozole together with erlotinib may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II clinical trial is studying how well giving letrozole together with erlotinib works in treating postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine the rate of clinical benefit (complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], and stable disease \[SD\] in patients with hormone-dependent locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer treated with letrozole in combination with erlotinib hydrochloride. Secondary * To determine the time to progression (TTP) in patients treated with this regimen. * To evaluate the anti-tumor activity, as determined by CR and PR rates, of this regimen in these patients. * To evaluate the safety of this regimen in these patients. * To determine if tumors that are positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or Ser118 ER, or that overexpress human epidermal receptor (HER2) exhibit a longer TTP from the combination compared to tumors that do not express or overexpress these molecules. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior hormone therapy (hormone-therapy naive/first-line therapy vs prior hormonal therapy with either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting/second-line therapy) Patients receive oral letrozole and oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then yearly thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib hydrochloride

OSI-774 150 mg/day

DRUGletrozole

Letrozole 2.5 mg/day

GENETICfluorescence in situ hybridization

To determine HER2 gene amplification or excess copies of the HER2 gene

OTHERimmunohistochemistry staining method

to measure the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR)

OTHERlaboratory biomarker analysis

To determine if specific biomarkers exhibit a longer time to tumor progression after treatment with the study drugs

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with measurable (but not operable) locally recurrent disease, or measurable and/or evaluable metastatic disease (see protocol section 10.3), including isolated bone metastases. * Patients with available paraffin tissue blocks from either the primary or the metastatic site must submit tissue blocks for retrospective EGFR and HER2 analysis. If tissue blocks cannot be submitted, 20 unstained slides from each paraffin block must be submitted. * All patients must be post-menopausal females as defined by one of the following: * Prior bilateral oophorectomy * Prior bilateral ovarian irradiation * No menstrual period for 12 months or longer * If age 55 years or less and \< 12 months from last menstrual period, patient must have a serum estradiol \< or equal to 30 and an FSH level \> 40. * Patients must not have had more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease and have fully recovered from any grade 2-4 toxicities related to chemotherapy. No concurrent chemotherapy is allowed while on protocol therapy. * Patients may have had 1 prior hormonal therapy for metastatic disease. This includes: tamoxifen, fulvestrant, anastrozole, exemestane, aminoglutethimide, megace, and letrozole. Patients may have received tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. * Patients must not have had prior therapy with EGF receptor inhibitors. * Previous but not concomitant therapy with trastuzumab (Herceptin) is allowed. Patients must not have received Herceptin within 4 weeks of initiation of protocol therapy. * Patients must have an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2. * Patients must have adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function as defined by the following within 2 weeks of initiation of therapy: * Absolute neutrophils \> or equal to 1,500/mm3 and platelets \> or equal to 100,000/mm3. * Bilirubin \< than or equal to 1.5 upper limit of normal. * SGOT and SGPT \< or equal to 2.5 upper limit of normal. * Creatinine \< or equal to 1.5 upper limit of normal. * INR, PTT and PT in the normal range. * Must be 18 years of age or older. * Patients must not have a history of central nervous system metastases or unevaluated CNS symptoms suggestive of possible brain metastases. * Patients may receive concurrent radiation therapy to painful bone metastases or areas of impending bone fracture as long as radiation therapy is initiated prior to study entry and sites of evaluable disease outside the radiation port(s) are available for follow-up. Patients who have received prior radiotherapy must have recovered from toxicity induced by this treatment. * Patients \< 55 years of age must not have received Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists within 3 months prior to protocol therapy. * Patients must not suffer from medical or psychiatric conditions that would interfere with ability to provide informed consent, communicate side effects, or comply with protocol requirements including maintenance of a compliance/pill diary. * Patients must be disease-free of prior invasive cancers for \> 5 years with the exception of basal or squamous cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Pathological Complete Response.at 24 weeksPer RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Time to Progression of Target LesionsEvery 12 weeks from on-study to disease progressionTime frame from study entry till discontinuation of treatment due to disease progression. Progression of target lesions is measured by RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) \> 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions.
Number of Patients With Anti-tumor Activity: Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR)at 24 weeksPer RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions and partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions.
Number of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Gradeat 24 weeksNumber of patients with worst-grade toxicities following NCI Common Toxicity Criteria: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, disabling, 5 = death

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled patients from November 2003 through July 2008.

Pre-assignment details

Fifty-one patients consented, one was ineligible and two withdrew before receiving study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
First Line/Hormone-therapy Naive
Patients who have not received hormonal therapy
42
Second-line/Prev Hormone-therapy tx
Patients who have previously received hormonal therapy
6
Total48

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event91
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDisease Progression244
Overall Studytwo patients are still on treatment20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSecond-line/Prev Hormone-therapy txFirst Line/Hormone-therapy NaiveTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants18 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants24 Participants29 Participants
Age Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants42 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants42 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 420 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 421 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Pathological Complete Response.

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions

Time frame: at 24 weeks

Population: Analysis population is patients who were available for response measurement. Some patients did not meet the criteria to be analyzed for response evaluation which accounts for the discrepancy in patients analyzed vs. total accrual population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Pathological Complete Response.28 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Pathological Complete Response.0 participants
Secondary

Median Time to Progression of Target Lesions

Time frame from study entry till discontinuation of treatment due to disease progression. Progression of target lesions is measured by RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) \> 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks from on-study to disease progression

Population: Patients who were available for response measurement. Seven patients in the Hormone therapy naive arm did not meet the criteria for response evaluation. One patient in the Previous Hormone Therapy arm did not meet the criteria for response evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Hormone Therapy NaiveMedian Time to Progression of Target Lesions12 MonthsFull Range 11.5
Previous Hormone TherapyMedian Time to Progression of Target Lesions3 MonthsFull Range 0
Secondary

Number of Patients With Anti-tumor Activity: Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR)

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions and partial response (PR) \> 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions.

Time frame: at 24 weeks

Population: Analysis population is patients who were available for response measurement. Seven patients in the Hormone therapy naive arm did not meet the criteria for response evaluation. One patient in the Previous Hormone Therapy arm did not meet the criteria for response evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Anti-tumor Activity: Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR)8 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Anti-tumor Activity: Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per Grade

Number of patients with worst-grade toxicities following NCI Common Toxicity Criteria: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, disabling, 5 = death

Time frame: at 24 weeks

Population: All patients who received treatment and experienced an adverse event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 111 participants
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 41 participants
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 221 participants
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 50 participants
Hormone Therapy NaiveNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 38 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 50 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 23 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 32 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 40 participants
Previous Hormone TherapyNumber of Patients With Worst-grade Toxicities Per GradeWorst grade toxicity Grade 10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026