Skip to content

Lateral Versus Anterior Spanning External Fixator for Tibial Plateau Fractures

Lateral Versus Anterior Spanning External Fixator for Tibial Plateau Fractures

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00610701
Enrollment
35
Registered
2008-02-08
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2017-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractures, Closed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients with tibial plateau fractures.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients with tibial plateau fractures. The goal is to compare the differences between anteriorly placed (front of leg) femoral external fixator pins and laterally placed (side of leg) femoral external fixator pins. Specifically, we are evaluating how this placement affects the quadriceps muscle and knee function. The parameters that will be assessed are knee function, pain, and range of motion.

Interventions

DEVICEAnterior pin placement

Anteriorly-placed (front of the leg) femoral external fixator pins

DEVICELateral pin placement

Laterally-placed (side of the leg) femoral external fixator pind

Sponsors

University of Missouri-Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age and above (adult population) * All open and closed tibial plateau fractures

Exclusion criteria

* 17 years of age and less (pediatric population) * Quadriplegic patients * Vascular Injury to Extremity * Ipsilateral femur fractures * Ipsilateral Hip fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quadriceps Strength(admission, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months) 1 yearmeasurement of quadriceps muscle strength at final followup = 1 year data at interim time points recorded, but only final reported for this purpose

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1-anterior Pin Placement
Anterior Anterior pin placement: Anteriorly-placed (front of the leg) femoral external fixator pins
5
2-lateral Pin Placement
Lateral Lateral pin placement: Laterally-placed (side of the leg) femoral external fixator pind
9
Total14

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1-anterior Pin Placement2-lateral Pin PlacementTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants9 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 53 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Quadriceps Strength

measurement of quadriceps muscle strength at final followup = 1 year data at interim time points recorded, but only final reported for this purpose

Time frame: (admission, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months) 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1-anterior Pin PlacementQuadriceps Strength35.9 NmStandard Deviation 10.7
2-lateral Pin PlacementQuadriceps Strength39.6 NmStandard Deviation 17.7
p-value: >0.05t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026