Skip to content

Dose Finding Study in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)(174007/P05805/MK-8777-003)

A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Two Period 4-Arm Trial to Investigate the Dose-Related Efficacy and Safety of Org 26576 in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00610441
Enrollment
67
Registered
2008-02-08
Start date
2008-04-01
Completion date
2009-03-09
Last updated
2018-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

randomized, double blind, placebo controlled

Brief summary

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of MK-8777 (Org 26576, SCH 900777) in adult subjects with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). MK-8777 or placebo will be administered in a crossover fashion for two 3-week treatment periods. The two 3-week treatment periods will be separated by a 2-week placebo washout period. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of various doses of MK-8777 to that of placebo in the treatment of ADHD symptoms in adults.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* are between 18-50 years, inclusive; * are male; or female who are non-pregnant, non-lactating and using an acceptable method of birth control (intrauterine device, double-barrier method, hormonal contraceptives); or female of non-childbearing potential if they are a) surgically sterile (tubal ligation, hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy) and provide documentation of the procedure by operative report or ultrasound scan, or b) post-menopausal for greater than one year with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than or equal to 40 mIU/mL at screening. All females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening; * are outpatients; * provide written informed consent * are fluent in the language of the investigator, * are able to discontinue the use of any psychotropic medications for the treatment of ADHD symptoms at screening; * meet strict operational criteria for adult ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM) * have a Clinical Global Impression ADHD score of 4 or higher at screening

Exclusion criteria

* have any clinically significant concurrent medical condition (endocrine, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematological, immunological, cerebrovascular, neurological, anorexia, obesity or malignancy) that has become unstable and may interfere with the interpretation of safety and efficacy evaluations. * have any clinically significant abnormal laboratory, vital sign, physical examination, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy evaluations. * have any history of liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, hepatitis), or liver injury;(history of hepatitis A greater than one year prior to screening is acceptable); any abnormal clinically significant findings at screening on liver laboratory parameters (serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\], serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\], gamma-glutamyltransferase \[GGT\], lactate dehydrogenase \[LDH\], bilirubin, albumin, protein, alkaline phosphatase); * have a seizure disorder beyond childhood or are taking any anticonvulsants to prevent seizures; * have known serological evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody; * have a positive test result at screening on hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis A immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies or hepatitis C total antibodies; * are pregnant as confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test at screening; * have QTc values \>450 msec at screening using Fridericia's QTc formula; * have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen test for alcohol, illegal or non-prescribed drugs at screening (except marijuana/ tetrahydrocannabinol \[THC\]); * have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen re-test for marijuana/THC; * have current or lifetime history of bipolar and psychotic disorders; * have a current major depression disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and eating disorder (also if treated but not currently symptomatic); * have a current comorbid dysthymia or social anxiety disorder that is currently treated with psychotropic medication; * have a current untreated social anxiety disorder that may interfere with the assessment of ADHD in the investigator's opinion; * present an imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others; * have any history of a significant suicide attempt, or possess a current risk of attempting suicide, in the investigator's opinion, based on clinical interview and responses provided on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS); * have a history of jailing or imprisonment in the past 6 months due to worsening of symptoms of ADHD;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreBaseline (BL) and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. For the statistical analyses, the average score from Day 14 and Day 21 was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS ScoreBaseline and Day 21The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
Percentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to 7 days after last dose of study drug (Up to 63 days)An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AEUp to last dose of study drug (Up to 56 days)An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresDays 14-21The CGI-S is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global severity of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill, with a higher score indicating more severe illness. Categorization was as follows: 1=Normal, not at all ill and Borderline mentally ill; 2=Mildly ill; 3=Moderately ill and 4=Markedly ill, Severely ill and Among the most extremely ill patients, with a higher category indicating more severe illness. Analysis of CGI-S was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-S assessments were condensed to one assessment of severity per treatment period by taking the most severe score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresDays 14-21The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global improvement of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Very much improved to 4=No change to 7=Very much worse, with a lower score indicating the most improvement. Analysis of CGI-I was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-I assessments were condensed to one assessment of improvement per treatment period by taking the worst improvement score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21The ESS is an 8-item scale used to assess sleepiness. The test consists of a list of 8 situations in which participants rate their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0=Would never doze to 3=High chance of dozing. The scores for each of the 8 situations are added to create a total score on a scale with a range from of 0 to 24. A higher score indicates a greater degree of sleepiness. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreBaseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21The PSQI is a participant-rated scale to assess the quality of sleep. The PSQI consists of 7 component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component score can range from 0=better (i.e., 0 times per month) to 3=worse (i.e., 3 or more times per week). The sum of these 7 component scores yields one total score with a range of 0 (better) to 21 (worse). A total PSQI score \<=5 is associated with good sleep quality; a total score \>5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreBaseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21The QIDS-C is a clinician-administered rating scale to measure the severity of depressive symptoms within the 9 DSM-IV major depression disorder symptom (MDD) domains: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. There is one score (0=none to 3=severe) for each of the of the 9 domains. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the 9 symptom domains. QIDS-C total scores can range from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depression. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
Change From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreBaseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21The TASS is a participant-administered scale to assess study drug effects in the evening. Participants respond to 18 questions about ADHD symptoms, with scores from 0=Not at all to 3=Severe. Total scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating more severe ADHD symtoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing (©CNS Vital Signs, Chapel Hill, NC) battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of cognitive flexibility (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS ScoreBaseline and Day 21The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of composite memory (score range: -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of executive functioning (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of speed of processing (score range: -1000 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reaction time (lowest time possible is 0 msec), with a lower reaction time indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reasoning (score range: -15 to 15), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of sustained attention (score range -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of verbal memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of visual memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of working memory (score range: -48 to 48), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
Computerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionBaseline, Day 21Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of complex attention (score range: 0 to 250), with a lower score indicating better cognition.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MK-8777 FD→PBO
Participants receive a fixed dose FD of MK-8777 100 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
15
PBO→MK-8777 FD
Participants receive a fixed dose of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of MK-8777 100 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
16
MK-8777 RD→PBO
Participants receive rising doses of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
18
PBO→MK-8777 RD
Participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
18
Total67

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Placebo Washout Period - 2 WeeksAdverse Event0020
Placebo Washout Period - 2 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject0100
Treatment Period 1 - 3 WeeksAdverse Event1141
Treatment Period 1 - 3 WeeksLack of Efficacy0010
Treatment Period 1 - 3 WeeksLost to Follow-up1110
Treatment Period 1 - 3 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject1011
Treatment Period 2 - 3 WeeksAdverse Event0001
Treatment Period 2 - 3 WeeksLack of Efficacy1000
Treatment Period 2 - 3 WeeksOther1101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMK-8777 FD→PBOPBO→MK-8777 FDMK-8777 RD→PBOPBO→MK-8777 RDTotal
Age, Continuous34.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants9 Participants5 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants11 Participants9 Participants13 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 5514 / 2826 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 550 / 280 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Score

The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. For the statistical analyses, the average score from Day 14 and Day 21 was used.

Time frame: Baseline (BL) and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline AISRS efficacy assessment. Results are reported by the study drug being administered at time of assessment and not by randomly assigned sequence.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100 mg MK-8777 fixed dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.014797.5% CI: [-10.911, -0.4881]Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100-300 mg MK-8777 rising dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.59197.5% CI: [-3.2961, 5.2814]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score

The ESS is an 8-item scale used to assess sleepiness. The test consists of a list of 8 situations in which participants rate their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0=Would never doze to 3=High chance of dozing. The scores for each of the 8 situations are added to create a total score on a scale with a range from of 0 to 24. A higher score indicates a greater degree of sleepiness. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline ESS efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 25, 27, 30)-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 25, 27, 30)-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 25, 27, 30)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 25, 27, 30)1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100 mg MK-8777 fixed dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.615597.5% CI: [-1.8138, 1.1812]MMRM
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100-300 mg MK-8777 rising dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.13397.5% CI: [-0.7449, 3.3317]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score

The PSQI is a participant-rated scale to assess the quality of sleep. The PSQI consists of 7 component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component score can range from 0=better (i.e., 0 times per month) to 3=worse (i.e., 3 or more times per week). The sum of these 7 component scores yields one total score with a range of 0 (better) to 21 (worse). A total PSQI score \<=5 is associated with good sleep quality; a total score \>5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline PSQI efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (N=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=21, 25, 24, 23)-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (N=25, 27, 27, 27)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (N=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=21, 25, 24, 23)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (N=25, 27, 27, 27)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (N=25, 27, 27, 27)-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (N=25, 26, 27, 30)0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=21, 25, 24, 23)-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (N=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=21, 25, 24, 23)-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (N=25, 27, 27, 27)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100 mg MK-8777 fixed dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.390797.5% CI: [-0.9427, 2.0429]MMRM
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100-300 mg MK-8777 rising dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.987297.5% CI: [-0.9486, 0.9357]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) Score

The QIDS-C is a clinician-administered rating scale to measure the severity of depressive symptoms within the 9 DSM-IV major depression disorder symptom (MDD) domains: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. There is one score (0=none to 3=severe) for each of the of the 9 domains. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the 9 symptom domains. QIDS-C total scores can range from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depression. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline QIDS-C efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=25, 26, 27, 30)-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=22, 25, 24, 23)0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=25, 27, 27, 27)0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100-300 mg MK-8777 rising dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.288397.5% CI: [-0.5187, 1.363]MMRM
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100 mg MK-8777 fixed dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.782897.5% CI: [-1.4898, 1.1811]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) Score

The TASS is a participant-administered scale to assess study drug effects in the evening. Participants respond to 18 questions about ADHD symptoms, with scores from 0=Not at all to 3=Severe. Total scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating more severe ADHD symtoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline TASS efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=20, 23, 22, 25)0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=15, 23, 21, 19)-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=20, 22, 20, 25)-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=20, 23, 22, 25)-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=15, 23, 21, 19)-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=20, 22, 20, 25)-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=20, 22, 20, 25)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=20, 23, 22, 25)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=15, 23, 21, 19)-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 7 (n=20, 23, 22, 25)-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 21 (n=15, 23, 21, 19)-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDChange From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) ScoreChange from BL at Day 14 (n=20, 22, 20, 25)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100 mg MK-8777 fixed dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.653297.5% CI: [-5.9599, 4.0229]MMRM
Comparison: The treatment difference between 100-300 mg MK-8777 rising dose and Placebo was estimated for the average effect (average change from baseline) of the 2nd and 3rd week of each period (Day 14 and Day 21).p-value: 0.524797.5% CI: [-2.8951, 5.0996]MMRM
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive Flexibility

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing (©CNS Vital Signs, Chapel Hill, NC) battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of cognitive flexibility (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for cognitive flexibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)48.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)50.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)49.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)49.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)47.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)50.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)46.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive FlexibilityDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)50.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Complex Attention

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of complex attention (score range: 0 to 250), with a lower score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for complex attention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)18.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)17.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)9.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Complex AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.3
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Composite Memory

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of composite memory (score range: -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for composite memory.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)92.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)98.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)93.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)92.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)96.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)96.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)96.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Composite MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)96.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Executive Functioning

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of executive functioning (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for executive functioning.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)49.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)52.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)50.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)50.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)49.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)53.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)48.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Executive FunctioningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)52.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction Time

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reaction time (lowest time possible is 0 msec), with a lower reaction time indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for reaction time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)646.7 msecStandard Deviation 87.3
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)634.4 msecStandard Deviation 74.6
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)621.7 msecStandard Deviation 152
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)645.6 msecStandard Deviation 81.6
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)653.1 msecStandard Deviation 118.8
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)646.7 msecStandard Deviation 139.3
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)673.8 msecStandard Deviation 124.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction TimeDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)642.4 msecStandard Deviation 111.5
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reasoning

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reasoning (score range: -15 to 15), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for reasoning.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)6.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)8.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: ReasoningDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of Processing

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of speed of processing (score range: -1000 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for speed of processing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)63.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)64.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)63.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)64.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)58.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)60.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)58.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of ProcessingDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)59.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained Attention

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of sustained attention (score range -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for sustained attention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)26.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)29.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)25.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)28.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)27.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)29.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)28.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained AttentionDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)27.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal Memory

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of verbal memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for verbal memory.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)49.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)52.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)51.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)48.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)50.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)51.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)51.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)50.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Visual Memory

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of visual memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for visual memory.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)43.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)46.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)41.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)43.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)46.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)44.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)45.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Visual MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)45.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Computerized Cognition Assessment: Working Memory

Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of working memory (score range: -48 to 48), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug in at least one period, and who had at least one postbaseline computerized cognition efficacy assessment for working memory.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryBL (n=27, 27, 26, 32)9.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDComputerized Cognition Assessment: Working MemoryDay 21 (n=21, 25, 25, 23)8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.

Time frame: Up to last dose of study drug (Up to 56 days)

Population: The AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of randomized study drug within at least one of the two treatment periods (excluding the placebo run-in period).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE3.6 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE3.6 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE20.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.

Time frame: Up to 7 days after last dose of study drug (Up to 63 days)

Population: The All-Subjects-Treated (AST) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of randomized study drug within at least one of the two treatment periods (excluding the placebo run-in period).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)56.4 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)71.4 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)85.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score

The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had at least one postbaseline AISRS efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score12.0 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score41.0 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score33.0 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score30.0 percentage of participants
95% CI: [1.799, 26.0878]
95% CI: [0.3119, 2.8701]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score

The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had at least one postbaseline AISRS efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score0.0 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score19.0 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score19.0 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score4.0 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.6712, 58.1395]
95% CI: [0.0152, 1.388]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global improvement of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Very much improved to 4=No change to 7=Very much worse, with a lower score indicating the most improvement. Analysis of CGI-I was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-I assessments were condensed to one assessment of improvement per treatment period by taking the worst improvement score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.

Time frame: Days 14-21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had at least one postbaseline CGI-I efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 10.0 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 60.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 54.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 212.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 70.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 320.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 464.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 60.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 455.56 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 325.93 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 53.70 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 70.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 211.11 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 13.70 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 448.15 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 13.70 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 23.70 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 340.74 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 53.70 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 60.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 70.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 340.74 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 70.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 60.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 214.81 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 13.70 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 57.41 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoresScore of 433.33 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.5402, 3.2008]
95% CI: [0.524, 3.7309]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category Scores

The CGI-S is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global severity of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill, with a higher score indicating more severe illness. Categorization was as follows: 1=Normal, not at all ill and Borderline mentally ill; 2=Mildly ill; 3=Moderately ill and 4=Markedly ill, Severely ill and Among the most extremely ill patients, with a higher category indicating more severe illness. Analysis of CGI-S was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-S assessments were condensed to one assessment of severity per treatment period by taking the most severe score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.

Time frame: Days 14-21

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized, who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had at least one postbaseline CGI-S efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 14.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 220.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 336.00 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 440.00 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 214.81 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 355.56 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 425.93 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100mg: MK-8777 FD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 FDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 13.70 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 355.56 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 211.11 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 429.63 percentage of participants
Placebo: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 13.70 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 418.52 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 222.22 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 17.41 percentage of participants
MK-8777 100-300mg: MK-8777 RD→PBO OR PBO→MK-8777 RDPercentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category ScoresCategory 351.85 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.5654, 2.5785]
95% CI: [0.6951, 4.9494]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026