Skip to content

A Comparison of Conventional Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Against a Concept With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation - LINC Study

A Comparison of Conventional Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Against a Concept With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00609778
Acronym
LINC
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2008-02-07
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2012-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

CPR, Mechanical, Manual, Survival, ROSC

Brief summary

The primary objective is to show superiority in survival of the modified method with the LUCAS Chest Compression System, compared to the conventional manual resuscitation method in patients suffering from out of hospital sudden cardiac arrest.

Detailed description

Every year 300 000 to 400 000 people suffer from sudden cardiac arrest outside of the hospital in Europe. Only 5 - 7 % of these patients survive and are discharged from hospital. In spite of massive education, research and new methods the survival rate has not improved. In the latest international guidelines for CPR, published in 2005, there is a strong emphasis on chest compressions with as little interruptions as possible. Manual chest compressions during CPR result in only 20-30% of normal blood flow and are difficult to perform for a long period of time. Mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS device have shown increased blood flow in experimental studies. Defibrillation during ongoing mechanical compressions is a new method of treatment that showed promising results in increased short time survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest in a recently completed pilot study. The LINC trial is a prospective randomised multicenter study where LUCAS according to a concept will be used with simultaneous defibrillation compared to manual chest compressions according to 2005 guidelines for advanced CPR. The study will be conducted in first tier systems, where LUCAS always will be placed in the first arriving ambulance.

Interventions

DEVICELUCAS

Mechanical chest compression

OTHERConventional manual resuscitation method

Manual compression

Sponsors

Uppsala University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jolife AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unexpected adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest where an attempt of resuscitation is considered appropriate.

Exclusion criteria

* Traumatic cardiac arrest, including hanging * Age believed to be less than 18 years (no upper limit) * Known pregnancy * Defibrillated before LUCAS Chest Compressions System arrives at scene * Patients body size not fitting the LUCAS Chest Compression System

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Four hour survival from successful restoration of spontaneous circulation.Four hours survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ROSC, Arrival to the emergency room with ROSC. Survival in hospital,Survival to hospital discharge Survival 1 and 6 months ( without severe neurological impairmen (CPC 1 or 2).Restoration of ROSC, Arrival to emergency room with ROSC, Survival to discharge from ICU, Survival to hospital discharge, Survival one and six months after SCA

Countries

Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026