Skip to content

The Effect of Glitazone Treatment on Bone Marrow and Bone Marrow Cells

The Effect of Glitazone Treatment on Bone Marrow and Bone Marrow Cells

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00609362
Enrollment
57
Registered
2008-02-07
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2011-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Change in Bone Marrow Fat Content, Change in Bone Mineral Density

Keywords

BMD, Rosiglitazone, Bone marrow fat

Brief summary

Osteoporosis is a generalised bone disease leading to an increased risk of fractures. The disease is caused partly by environmental and partly by genetic factors. It is well known that the fat content of the bone marrow is increased in osteoporotic patients. Animal studies suggest that stimulation of bone marrow stem cells through the molecule PPARgamma with the drug rosiglitazone converts the stem cells to fat cells instead of bone cells thereby decreasing bone strength. In a single study healthy volunteers were treated with rosiglitazone for 14 weeks and had a decrease in bone mineral density. In the present study we wish to investigate the effect of this treatment on bone and fat tissue. 25 women above the age of 60 will be treated with rosiglitazone 8 mg/day for 14 weeks and compared with 25 women receiving placebo. The effect will be evaluated as follows: 1. The effect on bone marrow density will be examined by a bone scan prior to and after treatment and again after 6 and 9 months. 2. The effect on bone turnover will be measured in blood- and urine samples at the same times. 3. The effect on fat distribution will be evaluated by an MRI scan after treatment. 4. The effect on bone marrow cells will be investigated bone marrow sampling immediately after treatment 5. The direct effect on fat will be examined by a biopsy immediately after treatment The study hypothesis is that rosiglitazone treatment decreases bone mineral density and increases bone marrow fat content. The causal molecular mechanisms will be investigated from the bone marrow and fat samples

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo pill

One encapsulated placebo pill a day for 14 weeks

DRUGRosiglitazone

one tablet of rosiglitazone 8 milligrams per day for 14 weeks

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal women age 60-75 with no rosiglitazone allergy

Exclusion criteria

* Osteoporosis * Diabetes * Hyperthyroidism, untreated hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism * Treatment with bone active drugs * Low impact fracture * Heart disease * Kidney failure * Liver failure * Anaemia * Ineligibility for MRI-scan * Cancer within last 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to 14 Weeks Between the Rosiglitazone Group and the Placebo GroupBMD measured at baseline and after 14 weeks of treatmentDifference in percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 14 weeks between the rosiglitazone group and the placebo group. BMD was assesed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Percent Change in Bone Marrow Fat (Given by a Lipid to Water Ratio) in the Spine.Measured at baseline and after 14 weeks of treatmentBone marrow fat was measured using MRI spectroscopy providing a measure of bone marrow fat as a ratio to bone marrow water, the lipid-water ratio (LWR)
Difference in Percent Change in Level of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTx) Between the Rosiglitazone and Placebo GroupsAt baseline and after 14 weeks of treatmentC-terminal telopeptide is a marker of bone resorption. Its levels are measure in plasma using a chemiluminometric method (ECLIA).
Change in Gene Expression in Bone Marrow and Fat CellsBefore and after treatment

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment commenced january 2008 and ended february 2009. Participants were recruited by ads in local papers and called our osteoporosis clinic. 179 called and after a course description 150 were sent information. After having read that 74 paid a visit to the clinic.

Pre-assignment details

74 individuals were screened. 17 were screen failures due to exclusion criteria. 57 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rosiglitazone
25 women age 60 to 75 years receiving rosiglitazone 8 mg/day
29
Placebo
25 women 60 to 75 years of age receiving placebo once a day for 14 weeks
28
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboRosiglitazoneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Age Continuous65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
28 participants29 participants57 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants29 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2615 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to 14 Weeks Between the Rosiglitazone Group and the Placebo Group

Difference in percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 14 weeks between the rosiglitazone group and the placebo group. BMD was assesed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Time frame: BMD measured at baseline and after 14 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RosiglitazoneDifference in Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to 14 Weeks Between the Rosiglitazone Group and the Placebo Group-1.3 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboDifference in Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to 14 Weeks Between the Rosiglitazone Group and the Placebo Group0.3 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 2.9
Comparison: The minimum number of participants was determined by power calculations to be 44 (22 in each group), assuming a difference in change in BMD of 1.7%, a standard deviation of 2%, a power of 80%, and a level of significance of 5%.p-value: 0.055t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Gene Expression in Bone Marrow and Fat Cells

Time frame: Before and after treatment

Secondary

Difference in Percent Change in Bone Marrow Fat (Given by a Lipid to Water Ratio) in the Spine.

Bone marrow fat was measured using MRI spectroscopy providing a measure of bone marrow fat as a ratio to bone marrow water, the lipid-water ratio (LWR)

Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 14 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RosiglitazoneDifference in Percent Change in Bone Marrow Fat (Given by a Lipid to Water Ratio) in the Spine.-13.5 Percent change in LWRStandard Deviation 5.5
PlaceboDifference in Percent Change in Bone Marrow Fat (Given by a Lipid to Water Ratio) in the Spine.6.8 Percent change in LWRStandard Deviation 24.4
p-value: 0.056t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Difference in Percent Change in Level of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTx) Between the Rosiglitazone and Placebo Groups

C-terminal telopeptide is a marker of bone resorption. Its levels are measure in plasma using a chemiluminometric method (ECLIA).

Time frame: At baseline and after 14 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RosiglitazoneDifference in Percent Change in Level of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTx) Between the Rosiglitazone and Placebo Groups20.4 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 38.6
PlaceboDifference in Percent Change in Level of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTx) Between the Rosiglitazone and Placebo Groups-7.1 Percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 24.4
p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026