Skip to content

Study of Macronutrients and Heart Disease Risk

Macronutrient Composition of Diet and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00609271
Acronym
MACRO
Enrollment
148
Registered
2008-02-07
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2018-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Cardiovascular Diseases, Obesity

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to examine the long-term effects of a diet low in carbohydrates, as compared to one low in fat, on cardiovascular disease risk factors, including blood pressure (BP), body weight and composition, serum lipids, plasma glucose, insulin, adipocytokines (adiponectin, leptin, resistin), and C-reactive protein (CRP) among obese adults. The investigators will test the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Compared to a low fat diet, a diet low in carbohydrates will reduce systolic and diastolic BP over 12 months; Hypothesis 2: Compared to a low fat diet, a diet low in carbohydrates will reduce body weight, total percent body fat, and waist circumference over 12 months; Hypothesis 3: Compared to a low fat diet, a diet low in carbohydrates will reduce serum levels of LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and increase serum levels of HDL-cholesterol over 12 months; Hypothesis 4: Compared to a low fat diet, a diet low in carbohydrates will reduce plasma levels of glucose and insulin levels over 12 months; and Hypothesis 5: Compared to a low fat diet, a diet low in carbohydrates will reduce plasma levels of leptin, resistin, and CRP and increase plasma levels of adiponectin over 12 months.

Detailed description

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of death globally as well as here in the United States. Manipulations of the macronutrient (protein, carbohydrate and fat) contents of diet have been used extensively for weight loss and weight control in the past several decades. Low carbohydrate diets, in particular, have gained popularity for weight loss. However, few studies have examined the effects of a diet low in carbohydrates on traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors in the long term, particularly in contrast to the current dietary recommendations for decreased fat intake to reduce risk of CVD. In this proposal, we plan to conduct a 12-month, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial of a diet low in carbohydrates versus the currently recommended low fat diet to reduce CVD risk factors among obese adults. The objective of this trial is to examine the long-term effects of a diet low in carbohydrates, as compared to one low in fat, on CVD risk factors, including blood pressure (BP), body weight and composition, serum lipids, plasma glucose, insulin, adipocytokines (adiponectin, leptin, resistin), and C-reactive protein (CRP) among obese adults. In order to accomplish these objectives we will randomize 130 eligible participants (n=65 in each group) to consume either a diet low in carbohydrates (≤40 g/d) or a diet low in fat (\<7% saturated fat, \<30% total fat). Neither of the diets will be energy-restricted. Participants will meet with a dietitian for one-on-one counseling sessions weekly for the first 4 weeks, then bi-monthly in small group sessions for the next 5 months, and monthly in larger group sessions for the final 6 months of the intervention. Data on both traditional and novel CVD risk factors will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. We hypothesize that a diet low in carbohydrates as compared to a diet low in fat will lower systolic and diastolic BP, body weight, total percent body fat, waist circumference, serum levels of triglycerides, and plasma levels of insulin, glucose, leptin, resistin, and CRP, and increase serum levels of HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin. Because CVD is the most common cause of death here in the U.S. and world-wide, this study has important public health implications. It will provide new information on the potential long-term effects of diets low in carbohydrates on both the traditional risk factors for CVD as well as novel risk factors and inflammatory factors. The results from this study will help to determine if a diet low in carbohydrates as compared to the currently recommended low fat diet can decrease the risk of CVD among obese adults.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALlow carbohydrate diet

\<40 grams carbohydrate/day

BEHAVIORALlow fat diet

\<30% fat, \<7% saturated fat

Sponsors

Tulane University Health Sciences Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women aged 22 - 75 years, any race/ethnicity * BMI of 30 - 45 k/m2 * Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of self-reported clinical CVD (angina/myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial disease) * Medical condition in which a low-carbohydrate diet may not be advised (diabetes, renal disease, cancer requiring treatment during the past year, osteoporosis, untreated thyroid disease, gout) * Current use of more than 2 antihypertensive or more than 2 cholesterol-lowering medications * For women, current pregnancy or breastfeeding or plans to become pregnant during the study period * Consumption of more than 21 alcoholic beverages per week * Currently on a diet or using prescription weight loss medications, underwent weight loss surgery, and/or experienced weight loss \>15 pounds within 6 months of study entry * Plans to move out of the study area (\>1 hour from study site) or difficulty to come to the study site * Participation of another household member in the study; employees or persons living with employees of the study * Participation in other lifestyle intervention trials currently * At the discretion of the study coordinator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted mean difference from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsMean Difference in Lean Mass predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsMean Difference in Fat Mass predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsPredicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary Group12 MonthsMean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values
Predicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsMean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 monthsMean Difference in Serum Insulin Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 MonthsMean Difference in C-reactive Protein Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values
Predicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 MonthsMean Difference in Serum Creatinine Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.
Predicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group12 MonthsMean Difference in 10-y Framingham Risk Score predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Carbohydrate Diet
low carbohydrate diet: \<40 grams carbohydrate/day
75
Low Fat Diet
low fat diet: \<30% fat, \<7% saturated fat
73
Total148

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Carbohydrate DietLow Fat DietTotal
Age, Continuous45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
body composition
Fat mass
40 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
40 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
40 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
body composition
Lean Mass
60 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
60 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
60 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
body mass index35.2 kg/m**2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
35.6 kg/m**2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
35.4 kg/m**2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
body weight96.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
97.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
97.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
C-reactive protein46.7 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40
46.7 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.6
46.7 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.5
diastolic blood pressure77.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
79.4 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
78.4 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Framingham risk percent3.9 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
4.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
4.0 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
HDL cholesterol53.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
56.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
55.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
LDL cholesterol122.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.6
122.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.6
122.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.6
Medication use
Antihypertensive
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
Medication use
Lipid-Lowering
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Physical activity level16.3 MET-h/wk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
19.6 MET-h/wk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.5
17.9 MET-h/wk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.1
plasma glucose94.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
93.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
94.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
40 Participants36 Participants76 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
34 Participants33 Participants67 Participants
serum creatinine1.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
serum insulin102.8 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.9
105.6 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.9
104.2 pmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants65 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
systolic blood pressure120.3 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
124.9 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
122.6 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
total cholesterol198.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.2
204.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.7
201.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.5
total-HDL cholesterol ratio3.8 unitless
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.8 unitless
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.8 unitless
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
triglycerides112.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.1
125.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.3
119.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 69.1
waist circumference108.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
111.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
109.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 7523 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 750 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Predicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted mean difference from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 3 months-5.7 kg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 6 months-5.6 kg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 12 months-5.3 kg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 3 months-2.6 kg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 6 months-2.3 kg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Body Weight From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in body weight after 12 months-1.8 kg
Primary

Predicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 3 mo-2.3 mm Hg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 6 mo-1.7 mm Hg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 12 mo-0.5 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 3 mo-0.9 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 6 mo-0.5 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure after 12 mo0.2 mm Hg
Primary

Predicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 3 months-0.05 mmol/L||
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 6 months0.03 mmol/L||
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 12 months0.02 mmol/L||
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 3 months-0.10 mmol/L||
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 6 months-0.10 mmol/L||
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Difference in Plasma Glucose Level, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Plasma Glucose Level after 12 months-0.10 mmol/L||
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in C-reactive Protein Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 3 mo-4.8 nmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 6 mo-4.8 nmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 12 mo-6.7 nmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 3 mo5.7 nmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 6 mo6.7 nmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in C-reactive Protein Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Creatinine Level after 12 mo8.6 nmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Fat Mass predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 3 months-1.1 % body weight that is fat mass
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 6 months-1.1 % body weight that is fat mass
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 12 months-1.2 % body weight that is fat mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 3 months-0.3 % body weight that is fat mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 6 months-0.1 % body weight that is fat mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Fat Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % fat mass after 12 months0.3 % body weight that is fat mass
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 3 mo0.03 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 6 mo0.10 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 12 mo0.24 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 3 mo-0.03 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 6 mo-0.00 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in HDL Cholesterol From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in HDL cholesterol level after 12 mo0.06 mmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 12 mo-0.08 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 3 mo-0.02 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 6 mo-0.04 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 12 mo-0.05 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 3 mo0.05 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in LDL Cholesterol Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in LDL cholesterol level after 6 mo0.02 mmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Lean Mass predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 3 months1.6 % of body weight that is lean mass
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 6 months1.5 % of body weight that is lean mass
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 12 months1.3 % of body weight that is lean mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 3 months0.4 % of body weight that is lean mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 6 months0.2 % of body weight that is lean mass
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Lean Mass From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of % lean mass after 12 months-0.4 % of body weight that is lean mass
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Serum Creatinine Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 3 mo-0.1 µmol/L¶
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 6 mo-3.1 µmol/L¶
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 12 mo-9.2 µmol/L¶
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 3 mo1.8 µmol/L¶
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 6 mo-1.7 µmol/L¶
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Grouphange in Serum Creatinine Level after 12 mo-8.5 µmol/L¶
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in Serum Insulin Level predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 3 mo-25.0 pmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 6 mo-21.5 pmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 12 mo-13.9 pmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 3 mo-18.8 pmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 6 mo-20.8 pmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Serum Insulin Level From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Serum Insulin Level after 12 mo-24.3 pmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 3 mo-4.2 mm Hg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 6 mo-2.9 mm Hg
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 12 mo-0.2 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 3 mo-2.6 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 6 mo-2.2 mm Hg
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Systolic Blood Pressure after 12 mo-1.3 mm Hg
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 3 mo-0.09 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 6 mo-0.04 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 12 mo0.05 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 3 mo0.03 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 6 mo0.03 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline by Assigned Dietary GroupChange of total cholesterol after 12 mo0.03 mmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol ratio after 3 mo-0.13 ratio
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol ratio after 6 mo-0.25 ratio
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol level after 12 mo-0.49 ratio
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol ratio after 3 mo0.13 ratio
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol ratio after 6 mo0.07 ratio
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Total-HDL Cholesterol Ratio From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Total-HDL cholesterol level after 12 mo-0.05 ratio
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 3 mo-0.21 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 6 mo-0.22 mmol/L
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 12 mo-0.23 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 3 mo0.03 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 6 mo-0.01 mmol/L
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences in Triglycerides From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in Triglycerides after 12 mo-0.07 mmol/L
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Mean Difference in 10-y Framingham Risk Score predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 3 mo-0.5 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 6 mo-0.7 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 12 mo-1.0 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 3 mo0.4 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 6 mo0.4 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of 10-y Framingham Risk Score From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in 10-Y Framingham Risk Score after 12 mo0.4 % risk of developing CVD in next 10 yrs
Primary

Predicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary Group

Predicted from random-effects models that included diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction term. Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques were used to impute missing values.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 3 mo-5.5 cm
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 6 mo-5.9 cm
Low Carbohydrate DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 12 mo-6.7 cm
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 3 mo-3.5 cm
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 6 mo-4.0 cm
Low Fat DietPredicted Mean Differences of Waist Circumference From Baseline, by Assigned Dietary GroupChange in waist circumference after 12 mo-5.0 cm

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026