Skip to content

Study Comparing Two Types of Ports in Patients With Cancer Receiving Intravenous Chemotherapy

A Prospective Randomized Study of the Vortex® Implantable Access Port Versus the BardPort™ Implantable Port in Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Intravenous Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00607880
Enrollment
100
Registered
2008-02-06
Start date
2004-06-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2014-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific, Vascular Access Device Complications

Keywords

vascular access device complications, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy drugs through an implanted port reduces the need for multiple needle sticks. It is not yet known whether one type of port is more effective than another in reducing infections and other side effects associated with long-term port use. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is comparing two types of ports in patients with cancer receiving intravenous chemotherapy.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To compare the rate of port failure, defined as the occurrence of port malfunction or port infection within 12 months after port insertion, in patients with cancer requiring long-term adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy undergoing insertion of a newly designed, FDA-approved Vortex® implantable vascular access port vs a conventional vascular access port. Secondary * To compare the rate of port malfunction or port infection at 6 and 12 months after port insertion. * To compare the rate of central vein thrombosis at 6 and 12 months after port insertion. * To compare the rate of port removal for any reason other than infection or occlusion at 6 and 12 months after port insertion. * To compare the rate of termination of use of the indwelling port at 6 and 12 months after port insertion. * To compare the death from all causes. * To compare the incidence of port-related interventions at 6 and 12 months after port insertion. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo insertion of a conventional vascular access port. Patients then receive standard chemotherapy. * Arm II : Patients undergo insertion of the Vortex® implantable vascular access port. Patients then receive standard chemotherapy. All episodes of access to the port are documented for 12 months after port insertion. Information including the reason for port access and difficulty in access is collected. Complications, such as occlusion and infection, implant duration, and incidence of port-related interventions are assessed at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.

Interventions

PROCEDUREvascular access device placement

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of malignancy requiring intravenous chemotherapy for ≥ 6 months * Must undergo entire course of chemotherapy at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, unless the outside treating institution agrees to submit the research data sheet to Mayo Clinic * Scheduled time frame for regular use of the vascular access port ≥ 3 months after port insertion PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Life expectancy ≥ 6 months * No active skin condition implicating an elevated risk of local or systemic infectious or non-infectious complications, including any of the following: * Current skin infection * Cutaneous lymphoma * Auto-immune disorders * Active vasculitis * Connective tissue diseases * No known active infection requiring antibiotic therapy at the time of port implantation * Patients without an active infection who are on chronic antibiotic suppressive therapy are eligible * No concurrent illness requiring chronic anticoagulation * Patients who develop other comorbidities requiring chronic anticoagulation during the study period are eligible PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Port Failure Within 12 Months of Port InsertionUp to 12 months from port insertionWe report the proportion of patients in each treatment group who have some degree of port failure. Port failure is defined as the composite outcome of port malfunction due to partial or total occlusion and any infection related to the port, within 12 months of port insertion. The percentages reported here are the number of patients that had reported a port failure within 12 months out of the number of patients with port failure within 12 months plus the number of patients that were followed 12 months without port failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death From All CausesUp to 12 months after port insertionNumber of patients that died during treatment due to any cause.
Port Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionUp to 12 months after port insertionWe report the number of patients that terminated use of port due to any reason other than infection or occlusion within 12 months.
Termination of Use of the Indwelling Port at 12 Months After Port InsertionUp to 12 months after port insertionThe number of patients that discontinued use of inserted port for any reason at the 12 month timepoint.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients considered for port implantation for intravenous chemotherapy were consulted and evaluated for port implantation. This evaluation was not study specific. If the implantation of a port system was feasible, the patient fulfilled inclusion criteria and the patient consented to the study, then they were randomly assigned a treatment port.

Pre-assignment details

One patient in the Standard Access Port group was unable to have the port placed due to chronic left internal jugular occlusion and was excluded from the analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Access Port
Patients undergo insertion of the conventional vascular access port (C. R. Bard, Inc., Murray Hill, NJ). Patients then receive standard chemotherapy.
50
Vortex Implantable Access Port
Patients undergo insertion of the Vortex® implantable vascular access port (Horizon Medical Products, Manchester, GA). Patients then receive standard chemotherapy.
50
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyUnable to place port due to occlusion10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Access PortVortex Implantable Access PortTotal
Age, Continuous65 years64 years65 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants50 participants100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants26 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 490 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 494 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Port Failure Within 12 Months of Port Insertion

We report the proportion of patients in each treatment group who have some degree of port failure. Port failure is defined as the composite outcome of port malfunction due to partial or total occlusion and any infection related to the port, within 12 months of port insertion. The percentages reported here are the number of patients that had reported a port failure within 12 months out of the number of patients with port failure within 12 months plus the number of patients that were followed 12 months without port failure.

Time frame: Up to 12 months from port insertion

Population: Patients with port failure within 12 months and patients that were followed 12 months without port failure were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard Access PortPort Failure Within 12 Months of Port Insertion16.1 percentage of patients
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Failure Within 12 Months of Port Insertion13.8 percentage of patients
Secondary

Death From All Causes

Number of patients that died during treatment due to any cause.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard Access PortDeath From All Causes9 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortDeath From All Causes6 participants
Secondary

Port Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port Insertion

We report the number of patients that terminated use of port due to any reason other than infection or occlusion within 12 months.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

Population: All patients accrued to this study that had their port removed within12 months for any reason other than infection/occlusion were included in this analysis. 28 patients using the Standard Access Port and 30 patients using the Vortex Implantable Access Port had port removal prior to 12 months due to reasons other than infection or occlusion..

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionDeath9 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionUnknown5 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionEnd of Chemotherapy7 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionSkin Erosion1 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionUnhealed Incision1 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionThrombosis0 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionPatient Moved/Transferred Care4 participants
Standard Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionPatient Request1 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionSkin Erosion0 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionPatient Request0 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionThrombosis1 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionUnknown10 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionDeath6 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionUnhealed Incision0 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionEnd of Chemotherapy6 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortPort Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port InsertionPatient Moved/Transferred Care7 participants
Secondary

Termination of Use of the Indwelling Port at 12 Months After Port Insertion

The number of patients that discontinued use of inserted port for any reason at the 12 month timepoint.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard Access PortTermination of Use of the Indwelling Port at 12 Months After Port Insertion31 participants
Vortex Implantable Access PortTermination of Use of the Indwelling Port at 12 Months After Port Insertion31 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026