Skip to content

U-500R Insulin In Type 2 Diabetes With Severe Insulin Resistance Via Omnipod

A Prospective Trial of U500 Regular Insulin by Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Severe Insulin Resistance Who Have Failed Previous Insulin Regimens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00606034
Enrollment
21
Registered
2008-02-01
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2014-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin Resistance, Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes, Insulin Resistance, Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion, U-500 Insulin, Omnipod

Brief summary

Patients with Type 2 diabetes and severe insulin resistance with very large insulin requirements who have failed all previous insulin regimens using non-concentrated forms of insulin (U100 insulin formulations) will receive 5X concentrated insulin (U500 regular insulin)infused via insulin pump.

Detailed description

Patients with Type 2 diabetes who have severe insulin resistance and very large insulin requirements (over 1.4 units of insulin /kg/day) often fail insulin regimens with persistent poor blood glucose control when standard U-100 insulin formulations are used. This is due in part to poor absorption of the large insulin volumes required using these less concentrated standard insulin preparations. The hypothesis that using a concentrated form of insulin called U-500 Regular insulin and delivering it by infusion via insulin pump will lower the volume of insulin required and therefore improve insulin absorption, which will lead to improved blood glucose control, will be tested.

Interventions

DRUGU-500 Insulin delivered by Omnipod (disposable insulin pump)

U-500 insulin (concentrated insulin) will be infused continuously subcutaneously using a disposable insulin pump called an Omnipod; the insulin infusion dosage will be individualized to each subject's needs

Sponsors

Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes on stable insulin regimen with or without oral agents for at least 3 months * HbA1c \> 7% * No significant cardiovascular, renal or other serious medical diseases

Exclusion criteria

* HbA1c \< 7% * Chronic renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, or other serious medical illness * Females of childbearing age not using adequate contraception * Use of GLP mimetic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Glycemic Control as Assessed by Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)1 yearHbA1c is expressed as a percentage. This measurement represents an average of plasma glucose concentration for about 3 months. We will report the change in HbA1c measured at 12 months vs Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemiabaseline versus 12 monthsFor the purposed of this study, hypoglycemia is defined as a blood glucose measurement of less than 70 mg/dl. As part of of this study, subjects will wear a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) for 72 hours to assess glycemic control. The percent of time in hypoglycemia is a part of the download from the CGM.
Patient Satisfaction With Insulin Delivery Method Via Insulin Delivery Rating System Questionnaire (IDRSQ)Baseline versus 1 yearOverall satisfaction rated on a scale of 0-100 percent with higher numbers indicating greater satisfaction with the insulin delivery method.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects recruited between Dec 2008 and Dec 2009 from clinic at Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center.

Pre-assignment details

Patients who had failed any previous insulin regimen with HbA1c over 7% and requiring over 100 units of insulin per day were enrolled and switched to treatment with U500 insulin via Omnipod.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects Active
All subjects will receive the experimental treatment (U-500 insulin via Omnipod) since they have already failed all other previous insulin treatment regimens.
21
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studyincarceration1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects Active
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants
Age, Continuous53.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Improvement in Glycemic Control as Assessed by Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

HbA1c is expressed as a percentage. This measurement represents an average of plasma glucose concentration for about 3 months. We will report the change in HbA1c measured at 12 months vs Baseline.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Subjects Using U-500 Regular Insulin Via OmnipodImprovement in Glycemic Control as Assessed by Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-1.23 HbA1c percentageStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Insulin Delivery Method Via Insulin Delivery Rating System Questionnaire (IDRSQ)

Overall satisfaction rated on a scale of 0-100 percent with higher numbers indicating greater satisfaction with the insulin delivery method.

Time frame: Baseline versus 1 year

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Subjects Using U-500 Regular Insulin Via OmnipodPatient Satisfaction With Insulin Delivery Method Via Insulin Delivery Rating System Questionnaire (IDRSQ)90.68 percent satisfactionStandard Deviation 8.13
Secondary

Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemia

For the purposed of this study, hypoglycemia is defined as a blood glucose measurement of less than 70 mg/dl. As part of of this study, subjects will wear a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) for 72 hours to assess glycemic control. The percent of time in hypoglycemia is a part of the download from the CGM.

Time frame: baseline versus 12 months

Population: ITT (LOCF for 1 subject)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Subjects Using U-500 Regular Insulin Via OmnipodPercentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemia-3.7 percent of time spent in hypoglycemiaStandard Deviation 4.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026