Skip to content

A Study Comparing Subcutaneous Mircera and Darbepoetin Alfa for Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

An Open Label Randomised Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Subcutaneous Mircera Versus Darboepoetin Alfa for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Renal Transplant Recipients With Chronic Renal Anaemia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00605345
Enrollment
71
Registered
2008-01-31
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2016-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

This two arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous Mircera versus darbepoetin alfa for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in kidney transplant recipients with chronic renal anemia. Patients currently receiving maintenance treatment with darbepoetin alfa will be randomized either to receive 4-weekly injections of Mircera with a starting dose (120, 200 or 360 micrograms subcutaneously) derived from the dose of darbepoetin alfa they were receiving in the 2 weeks preceding study start, or to stay on 2-weekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGDarbepoetin alfa

As prescribed

DRUGmethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

120, 200 or 360 micrograms sc 4-weekly (starting dose)

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \> or = 18 years of age; * kidney transplant recipients with stage 3 or stage 4 chronic kidney disease; * functioning graft of \> 6 months and \< 10 years after kidney transplantation, with no signs of acute rejection; * stable maintenance subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa therapy every 2 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months; * poorly controlled hypertension; * significant acute or chronic bleeding; * need for dialysis therapy expected in next 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP) Within the Target RangeWeeks 16-28Key outcomes will be assessed during the first 12 weeks following the 16 weeks dose titration period, i.e. during the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP). Assessments performed every four weeks, beginning at week 16 up to week 28. The reference haemoglobin is defined as the mean of the two assessments recorded during the SVP (weeks -4 and -2). For the purposes of efficacy assessment the target haemoglobin concentration range will be defined as ± 1 g/dL of the reference haemoglobin concentration AND within the range 10 - 12 g/dL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)Baseline to 28 weeksReference haemoglobin at baseline is defined as the mean of the two assessments recorded at weeks -4 and -2. Additional assessments were then performed every 4 weeks at week 0 through week 28. Mean change was calculated as value at 28 weeks minus baseline.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hb Concentration in 10-12 g/dL Range Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)Weeks 16-28
Mean Time Spent in 10-12g/dL Range During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)Weeks 16-28Efficacy Evaluation Period was the 12 weeks following 16 weeks of treatment in the Dose Titration Period.
Percentage of Participants Needing Dose AdjustmentsUp to 28 weeksAssessment of the Dose Titration Period of 16 weeks of treatment and following 12 weeks, known as the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP).
Incidence of RBC TransfusionsUp to 28 weeksAssessment of the Dose Titration Period of 16 weeks of treatment and following 12 weeks, known as the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP).

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CERA Treatment Once Monthly
CERA 120, 200 or 360 micrograms subcutaneously
46
Darbepoetin Alfa Once Biweekly
Darbepoetin Alfa as prescribed
25
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCERA Treatment Once MonthlyDarbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyTotal
Age, Continuous54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.04
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
Region of Enrollment
Spain
46 participants25 participants71 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants8 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants17 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 4616 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 463 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP) Within the Target Range

Key outcomes will be assessed during the first 12 weeks following the 16 weeks dose titration period, i.e. during the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP). Assessments performed every four weeks, beginning at week 16 up to week 28. The reference haemoglobin is defined as the mean of the two assessments recorded during the SVP (weeks -4 and -2). For the purposes of efficacy assessment the target haemoglobin concentration range will be defined as ± 1 g/dL of the reference haemoglobin concentration AND within the range 10 - 12 g/dL.

Time frame: Weeks 16-28

Population: Analysis was performed in the per protocol (PP) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyThe Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP) Within the Target Range64.29 percentage of participants
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyThe Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP) Within the Target Range57.14 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5947Fisher Exact
Secondary

Incidence of RBC Transfusions

Assessment of the Dose Titration Period of 16 weeks of treatment and following 12 weeks, known as the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP).

Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

Population: Analysis performed with the intent to treat (ITT) population, which includes all participants receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyIncidence of RBC Transfusions1 participants
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyIncidence of RBC Transfusions2 participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)

Reference haemoglobin at baseline is defined as the mean of the two assessments recorded at weeks -4 and -2. Additional assessments were then performed every 4 weeks at week 0 through week 28. Mean change was calculated as value at 28 weeks minus baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to 28 weeks

Population: Analysis performed in the Intent toTreat (ITT) population, which includes all participants receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyMean Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)0.08 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.85
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyMean Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)0.05 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.06
Secondary

Mean Time Spent in 10-12g/dL Range During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)

Efficacy Evaluation Period was the 12 weeks following 16 weeks of treatment in the Dose Titration Period.

Time frame: Weeks 16-28

Population: Analysis was performed using the intent to treat (ITT) population, which includes all participants receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyMean Time Spent in 10-12g/dL Range During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)57.0 daysStandard Deviation 23.98
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyMean Time Spent in 10-12g/dL Range During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)50.5 daysStandard Deviation 27.7
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hb Concentration in 10-12 g/dL Range Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)

Time frame: Weeks 16-28

Population: Analysis performed with intent to treat (ITT) population, which includes all participants receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyPercentage of Participants Maintaining Hb Concentration in 10-12 g/dL Range Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)71.7 percentage of participants
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyPercentage of Participants Maintaining Hb Concentration in 10-12 g/dL Range Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP)64.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Needing Dose Adjustments

Assessment of the Dose Titration Period of 16 weeks of treatment and following 12 weeks, known as the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP).

Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyPercentage of Participants Needing Dose AdjustmentsDose Titration Period73.9 percentage of participants
CERA Treatment Once MonthlyPercentage of Participants Needing Dose AdjustmentsEfficacy Evaluation Period (n=45,23)33.3 percentage of participants
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyPercentage of Participants Needing Dose AdjustmentsDose Titration Period56.0 percentage of participants
Darbepoetin Alfa Once BiweeklyPercentage of Participants Needing Dose AdjustmentsEfficacy Evaluation Period (n=45,23)20.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026