Skip to content

Allogeneic HCT With HLA-matched Donors : a Phase II Randomized Study Comparing 2 Nonmyeloablative Conditionings

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With HLA-matched Donors : a Phase II Randomized Study Comparing 2 Nonmyeloablative Conditionings

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00603954
Enrollment
107
Registered
2008-01-29
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2022-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematological Malignancies

Keywords

Nonmyeloablative conditioning., Hematological malignancies., GVHD.

Brief summary

The present project aims at comparing two nonmyeloablative regimens currently used in 2 major HCT centers in the US for patients with HLA-matched related or unrelated donor: the one from the Seattle group consisting of 2 Gy TBI with fludarabine (90 mg/m²) versus the one from the Stanford group combining 8 Gy TLI with ATG.

Detailed description

I. OBJECTIVES The present project aims at comparing two nonmyeloablative regimens currently used in 2 major HCT centers in the US for patients with HLA-matched related or unrelated donor: the one from the Seattle group consisting of 2 Gy TBI with fludarabine (90 mg/m²) versus the one from the Stanford group combining 8 Gy TLI with ATG. II. DESIGN OF THE STUDY The study is a multicenter, randomized phase II study, comparing two conditioning regimens. Sixty patients with HLA-matched donors will be randomized between the TBI or the DLI regimen. There will be a stratification between centers. There will be a stopping rule for graft rejection \> 15% at day 180 (in each group separately), and for nonrelapse mortality \> 35% at day 180 (in each group separately). If the stopping rules are not triggered after 60 patients and no statistically significant differences are seen between the 2 arms in terms of acute GVHD, graft rejection and survival, a second cohort of 40 patients will be included. III. TREATMENT PLAN III.1. Pre-transplant procedures Peripheral blood mononucleated cells from the patient as well as from the donor will be collected before conditioning, as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic HSC transplants. Part will be cryopreserved in 10 % DMSO and stored at -180°C in liquid nitrogen. The other part will be devoted to identification of specific donor and patient markers to be used in later measurements of chimerism. III.2. Conditioning regimens The conditioning regimens used will be either the one developed in Seattle (TBI arm) or the one developed by the Stanford group (TLI arm). These 2 regimens have been extensively reported in major medical journals. In the TBI arm, conditioning will consist of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days -4, -3 and -2 (total dose 90 mg/m2), followed by a singe dose of 2 Gy TBI administered on day 0, at a low dose-rate (≈ 7 cGy/min), before infusion of cells. In the TLI arm, conditioning will consist of 8 Gy TLI and ATG. TLI will be administered by linear accelerator at a dose of 80 cGy daily, starting 11 days before transplantation, until a total of 10 doses (800 cGy) has been delivered. The irradiation will consist of a supradiaphragmatic mantle field, a subdiaphragmatic field including an inverted Y and splenic ports, encompassing all major lymphoid organs, including the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, as used in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (Kaplan HS, Cancer Research 26:1268-1276, 1966). The Waldeyer ring is not included. ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme), at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d, will be given intravenously on days -11 through -7. III.3. PBSC collection and transplantation PBSC mobilization and collection in the donor will be performed as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic HSC transplants. This is briefly described below. The donor will be given SC injections of G-CSF at a dose of 10-15 µg/kg for 6 days (days -5 through 0). Additional doses of G-CSF may be given on days +1 and +2 if the first 2 leukaphereses do not yield sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells. G-CSF will generally be administered : * In the evening on days -5, -4, -3, -2; * Before 7:00 on days -1 and 0 (and on days 1 and 2 if necessary). Collection of PBSC will be carried out on day -1 and in the morning on day 0. Leukaphereses will be performed using a continuous flow blood cell separator and following a mononuclear cell collection protocol. The volume of blood processed will be 15-20 liters if donor is an adult or 10 liters/m2 if donor is a child. Anticoagulation will be performed with the ACD-A solution. The PBSC from the first day of harvest will be stored overnight at 4°C in the patient's own plasma. After the second harvest, PBSC from the first and second day of harvest will be infused into the patient. Based on previous reports suggesting that higher dose of CD34 cells are associated with better outcomes after nonmyeloablative HCT, high doses of CD34+ cells (\>6.5 x 106/kg) should be ideally administered. Nevertheless, to limit donor procedures, only two leukaphereses are required. However, in case the required minimal number of cells (3 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient) cannot be obtained with the first two collections, additional leukaphereses should be carried out unless contra-indicated for the donor. Cells will be infused through a central catheter according to standard procedures. III.4. Other treatments of the recipient III.4.1. Immunosuppressive therapy The immunosuppressive regimens used will be the one used in standard practice for routine NM-HCT at our centers, i.e. an association of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). MMF will be administered orally from the evening of day 0 through day 28 (sibling recipients) or day 42 (alternative donor recipients) at the dose of 15 mg/kg t.i.d. Tacrolimus will be given orally at the dose of 0.06 mg/kg bid starting on day -3. The dose will then be adapted according to through whole blood values following standard procedures (between 15 and 20 ng/ml the first 28 days and between 10-15 ng/ml thereafter). Full doses will be given until day 100 (sibling recipients) or 180 (alternative donor recipients). Doses will then be progressively tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 180 (sibling donors) or 365 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD. Tacrolimus may be stopped earlier in case of disease progression or graft rejection or continued longer in case of low donor T-cell chimerism or GVHD. GVHD will be assessed according to standard criteria. Therapy for acute or chronic GVHD will use standard procedures/current protocols. III.4.2. Growth factors Growth factors will be used as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT. No myeloid growth factor will be administered unless the granulocyte count falls below 1000/µl. Patients may then be treated with 5 µg/kg/day of G-CSF to maintain the granulocyte count \> 1,000/µl. Erythropoietin may be administered as required. III.4.3. Infection prophylaxis Infection prophylaxis against bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic agents will be carried out as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT. III.4.4. Donor lymphocyte infusion Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) will be given as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT. DLI may be given in case of poor T-cell chimerism or disease progression according to standard procedures/current protocols. IV. PATIENTS' FOLLOW-UP IV.1. Quality controls of cell products IV.1.1. Peripheral blood of donor on days of PBSC collection As per standard practice for all routine allogeneic PBSC transplants. IV.1.2. Leukapheresis product As per standard practice for all routine allogeneic PBSC transplants including determination of the number of TNC, CD34, CD3 , CD4 and CD8 cells transplanted. IV.2. Toxicities of cell infusions Potential toxicities associated with PBSC infusions will be carefully monitored per the standard procedures. IV.3. Chimerism The chimeric status of hematopoietic cells will be carefully monitored post-transplant, as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic transplants. Donor chimerism will be measured in whole blood as well as bone marrow. In addition, peripheral blood cells will be separated by RosetteSep procedure (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) to determine the proportion of donor and recipient cells in pure population of T (CD3+) cells. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for X and Y chromosome will be used preferentially for sex-mismatched HCT, while PCR techniques based on short tandem repeat (STR) markers will be used for sex-matched HCT. Pre-transplant donor and recipient peripheral WBC will serve to identify specific markers. We define complete chimerism as the presence of \>95% of T cells of donor origin and mixed chimerism as the presence of 6-94% of T cells of donor origin. Graft rejection is defined as the occurrence of T cell chimerism \< 5% and engraftment as the occurrence of more than 5% T cells of donor origin in the first month following the transplant. The proportion of donor chimerism will be determined at the following time points: 1. peripheral blood : * Days 28, 42, 60, 100, 180 and 365 post-transplant : whole blood and CD3+ cells; * Analyses on day 60 are only necessary when chimerism is \< 80% on days 28 and/or 42; * Analyses on whole blood on days 42, 100, 180 and 365 are only necessary when bone marrow analyses are not feasible/successful. 2. bone marrow : • Days 42, 100, 180 and 365 post-transplant : whole bone marrow. IV.4. Clinical data Patient will be carefully observed and the following clinical parameters will be recorded (see appendices B and C). Appendices B and C should be send not more than 3 months after the patient achieved the target day after HSCT (day 100, day 180, 1-yr, 2-yr, 3-yr, 4-yr and 5-yr) to Frederic Baron at the fax # 32-4-366 8855. * Incidence, timing and severity of acute GVHD, its treatment and outcome; * Incidence, timing and severity of chronic GVHD, its treatment and outcome; * Incidence, timing and severity of cytopenia, its treatment and outcome; number of platelet and RBC transfusions; G-CSF usage; * Time to achieve 500 neutrophils, 1000 neutrophils, 20 000 platelets and 50 000 platelets; * Duration of hospitalization, if any; * Incidence of bacterial infections; * Incidence of fungal infections; * Incidence of CMV infections (by quantitative PCR) and CMV disease; * Incidence of other viral infections; * Incidence of other infections; * Evolution of the primary malignant disease : response, relapse, its treatment and outcome; * Any other serious complication associated with the transplant procedure; * Death and survival. IV.5. Immunologic data. In patients transplanted at the university of Liège, immune reconstitution in the patient will be monitored as per standard practice at ULg for all routine allogeneic transplants. For patients transplanted outside of the University of Liège and willing to participate to the immune recovery study, 50 mL of fresh heparinized blood collected on days 42, 100, 180, 365 and 730 can be send at room temperature to Olivier Dengis, Department of Clinical Hematology, CHU Sart-Tilman, B4000 Liège.

Interventions

DRUGConditioning regimen: TBI + Fludarabine

2 Gy TBI, Fludarabine 90 mg/m²

DRUGConditioning regimen:TLI (8 Gy) + ATG

TLI 8 Gy + ATG (Thymoglobulin) 7.5 mg/kg

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liege
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

PATIENT 1. Diseases Hematological malignancies confirmed histologically and not rapidly progressing: * AML in CR (defined as ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood); * MDS with ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood; * CML in CP; * MPS not in blast crisis and not with extensive marrow fibrosis, * ALL in CR; * Multiple myeloma not rapidly progressing; * CLL; * Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (aggressive NHL should have chemosensitive disease); * Hodgkin's disease with chemosensitive disease. 2. Clinical situations * Theoretical indication for a standard allo-transplant, but not feasible because: * Age \> 50 yrs; * Unacceptable end organ performance; * Patient's refusal. * Indication for a standard auto-transplant: perform mini-allotransplantation 2-6 months after standard autotransplant. 3. Other inclusion criteria * Male or female; fertile patients must use a reliable contraception method; * Age \< 75 yrs; * Informed consent given by patient or his/her guardian if of minor age. DONOR * Related to the recipient (sibling, parent or child) or unrelated; * Male or female; * Any age; * 10 of 10 (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1) HLA allele matched; * Weight \> 15 Kg (because of leukapheresis); * Fulfills criteria for allogeneic PBSC donation according to standard procedures; * Informed consent given by donor or his/her guardian if of minor age, as per donor center standard procedures.

Exclusion criteria

PATIENT * Any condition not fulfilling inclusion criteria; * HIV positive; * Non-hematological malignancy(ies) (except non-melanoma skin cancer) \< 3 years before nonmyeloablative HCT. * Life expectancy severely limited by disease other than malignancy; * Administration of cytotoxic agent(s) for cytoreduction within three weeks prior to initiating the nonmyeloablative transplant conditioning (Exceptions are hydroxyurea and imatinib mesylate); * CNS involvement with disease refractory to intrathecal chemotherapy. * Terminal organ failure, except for renal failure (dialysis acceptable) * Uncontrolled infection; * Karnofsky Performance Score \<70%; * Patient is a fertile man or woman who is unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment; * Patient is a female who is pregnant or breastfeeding; * Previous radiation therapy precluding the use of 2 Gy TBI or 8 Gy TLI; DONOR * Any condition not fulfilling inclusion criteria; * Unable to undergo leukapheresis because of poor vein access or other reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups180 days after HCTPercentage of participants with aGVHD according grades: Grade I: rash skin \< 25 % area; bilirubin: 20-30 mg/ml; diarrhea: 500-1000 ml/day Grade II: rash skin 25-50 % area; bilirubin: 30-60 mg/ml; diarrhea: 10000-1500 ml/day Grade III:rash skin \> 50 % area; bilirubin: 60-150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>1500 ml/day Grade IV: erythroderma; bilirubin: \> 150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>2000 ml/day Grade IV is the worst grade Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups1 year after HCT
Number of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism1 year after HCTgraft rejection are reported in outcome measure data table (defined as ≤ 5% donor chimerism in T cells, total white blood cells and/or total bone marrow cells).
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups2 years after HCTComparaison of the number of Participants with chronic GVHD in the 2 groups
Incidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.D100 after HCT
Quality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG LevelsDay 0, Day 3 and Day 10Analyses of ATG levels in order to assess the immune system recuperation
Percentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups4 year after HCT
Percentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups5 year after HCT
Percentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups4 year after HCT
Percentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups5 year after HCT
Percentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups1 year after HCT

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Flu-TBI
Conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days -4, -3 and -2 (total dose 90 mg/m2), followed by a singe dose of 2 Gy TBI administered on day 0, at a low dose-rate (≈ 7 cGy/min), before infusion of cells. Conditioning regimen TBI + Fludarabine: 2 Gy TBI, Fludarabine 90 mg/m²
49
TLI-ATG
Conditioning consisting of 8 Gy TLI and ATG. TLI will be administered by linear accelerator at a dose of 80 cGy daily, starting 11 days before transplantation, until a total of 10 doses (800 cGy) has been delivered. The irradiation will consist of a supradiaphragmatic mantle field, a subdiaphragmatic field including an inverted Y and splenic ports, encompassing all major lymphoid organs, including the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, as used in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (Kaplan HS, Cancer Research 26:1268-1276, 1966). The Waldeyer ring is not included. ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme), at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d, will be given intravenously on days -11 through -7. Conditioning regimen II (TLI 8 Gy + ATG \[Thymoglobulin\]): TLI 8 Gy + ATG (Thymoglobulin) 7.5 mg/kg
45
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFlu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants35 Participants71 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years59 years60 years
Donor: HLA-identical sibling/ 10/10 HLA-allele matched URD
10/10 HLA-allele matched URD
20 participants20 participants40 participants
Donor: HLA-identical sibling/ 10/10 HLA-allele matched URD
HLA-identical sibling
29 participants25 participants54 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
45 Participants43 Participants88 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants29 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
22 / 4919 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 4921 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 4941 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups

Percentage of participants with aGVHD according grades: Grade I: rash skin \< 25 % area; bilirubin: 20-30 mg/ml; diarrhea: 500-1000 ml/day Grade II: rash skin 25-50 % area; bilirubin: 30-60 mg/ml; diarrhea: 10000-1500 ml/day Grade III:rash skin \> 50 % area; bilirubin: 60-150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>1500 ml/day Grade IV: erythroderma; bilirubin: \> 150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>2000 ml/day Grade IV is the worst grade Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

Time frame: 180 days after HCT

Population: Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups12.2 percentage of participants with aGVHD
TLI-ATGPercentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups8.9 percentage of participants with aGVHD
p-value: 0.508Multivariate Cox models
Comparison: At day 180p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: At Day 365p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Incidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.

Time frame: D100 after HCT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.Bacterial infection19 participants
Flu-TBIIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.Fungal infection3 participants
Flu-TBIIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.CMV reactivation15 participants
TLI-ATGIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.Bacterial infection25 participants
TLI-ATGIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.Fungal infection7 participants
TLI-ATGIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.CMV reactivation21 participants
Comparison: 19 of 49 Flu-TBI patients (39%) versus 25 of 45 TLI ATG patients (56%) had a least one episode of bacterial infection the first 100 days after transplantation (P = 0.15).p-value: 0.15Fisher Exact
Comparison: For fungal infections, the figures were 3 of 45 (6%) and 7 of 45 (16%), respectively (P = 0.19)p-value: 0.19Fisher Exact
Comparison: Among CMV-seropositive patients and/or donors, the 100-day cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was 31% in Flu-TBI patients versus 47% in TLI-ATG patientp-value: 0.12Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism

graft rejection are reported in outcome measure data table (defined as ≤ 5% donor chimerism in T cells, total white blood cells and/or total bone marrow cells).

Time frame: 1 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBINumber of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism3 participants
TLI-ATGNumber of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism4 participants
Comparison: At day 100p-value: 0.09Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: At Day 40p-value: 0.03Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: At Day 180p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Percentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 4 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups53 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups54 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.995% CI: [1, 1.4]Kaplan-Meier method
Secondary

Percentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 4 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups54 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups37 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.1495% CI: [1, 4.1]Kaplan-Meier method
Secondary

Percentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 5 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups53 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups55 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.9695% CI: [1, 1.4]Kaplan-Meier method
Secondary

Percentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 5 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups50 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups37 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 1 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups24 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups13 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5Cumulative incidence curve
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups

Comparaison of the number of Participants with chronic GVHD in the 2 groups

Time frame: 2 years after HCT

Population: Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups40.8 percentage of participants
TLI-ATGPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups18.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0165Multivariate Cox models
p-value: 0.01Mutivariate
p-value: 0.0495Multivariate
p-value: 0.001Multivariate
Secondary

Percentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups

Time frame: 1 year after HCT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Flu-TBIPercentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups22 percentage of Relapse
TLI-ATGPercentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups50 percentage of Relapse
Comparison: Four-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression were 22% and 50% in Flu-TBI and TLI-ATG patients, respectivelyp-value: 0.01795% CI: [1.1, 4.7]Cumulative incidence curves
Secondary

Quality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG Levels

Analyses of ATG levels in order to assess the immune system recuperation

Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Flu-TBIQuality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG LevelsMedian ATG serum levels at day 04 mg/L
Flu-TBIQuality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG LevelsMedian ATG serum levels at day 32.2 mg/L
Flu-TBIQuality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG LevelsMedian ATG serum levels at day 100.95 mg/L
Comparison: This statistical analysis applies to median ATG serum levels at day 0
Comparison: This statistical analysis applies to median ATG serum levels at day 3
Comparison: This statistical analysis applies to median ATG serum levels at day 10

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026