Skip to content

Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Oxygen Venturi in Acute Respiratory Failure in CAP: CAPOVeRSO

A Comparison of CPAP Delivered by Helmet and O2 Therapy With Venturi Mask for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Community-acquired Pneumonia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00603564
Acronym
CAPOVeRSO
Enrollment
47
Registered
2008-01-29
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2009-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lung Injury, Community-Acquired Infections, Pneumonia, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

CPAP, community-acquired pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, hypoxemia, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of CPAP application by a helmet and O2 administration by a Venturi mask in terms of gas exchanges improvement in patients with acute respiratory failure due to community-acquired pneumonia.

Detailed description

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the commonest causes of hospitalised acute respiratory failure with a mortality rate up t 30%. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has ben recently proved to be effective. To date, however, no prospective randomised study has been published on the comparison between CPAP and O2 administration via a Venturi mask for the treatment of acute respiratory failure in immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of CPAP delivered by a helmet and O2 administration via a Venturi mask in terms of gas exchanges improvement in early acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 between 210 and 285)due to community-acquired pneumonia. A Steering Committee composed by the principal investigators will request an interim analysis at 20% enrolment in order to monitor the criteria for equipoise of the two treatments.

Interventions

PROCEDURECastar Starmed (CPAP) delivered by a helmet

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure delivered by a helmet with PEEP valve of 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5

Sponsors

University of Milan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) defined as: new chest x-ray pulmonary infiltrate, fever, and respiratory symptoms * Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory failure * Respiratory Rate \< 35 breaths/min * PaO2/FiO2 \> 200 and \< 300 while breathing oxygen for at least 15 minutes via a Venturi mask with FiO2 0.5

Exclusion criteria

* Immunosuppression * acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema * Patients belonging to Class II-III-IV of the NYHA * Acute coronary syndrome * Acute Respiratory Acidosis pH \< 7.35 and PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg * More than 3 acute organ failures * Systolic Pressure \< 90 mmHg under fluid resuscitation or vasopressor drug use * Seizures * Decreased level of consciousness (GCS \<12) * Inability to clear secretions * Pre-defined intubation criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to Reach an Improvement in Terms of Gas Exchange, Defined as a PaO2/FiO2 Ratio ≥315on admission and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours until PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Mantainance1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hoursthe number of subjects who could maintain, once reached, a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315 at 1 and 24 hours after the qualifying measurement

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The Steering Committee requested an interim analysis at 20% enrollment in order to monitor the criteria for actual equipoise of the two treatments. Being this unplanned, the Lan-DeMets approach was followed and a manifest superiority of the CPAP treatment was identified, with a nominal alpha exceeding the criterion for interruption set at 0.00008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure)
CPAP delivered by a helmet
20
Venturi
O2 administration via a conventional Venturi mask
27
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVenturiCPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants12 Participants31 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Age Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
Italy
27 participants20 participants47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Reach an Improvement in Terms of Gas Exchange, Defined as a PaO2/FiO2 Ratio ≥315

Time frame: on admission and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours until PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure)Time to Reach an Improvement in Terms of Gas Exchange, Defined as a PaO2/FiO2 Ratio ≥315405 minuteStandard Deviation 855
VenturiTime to Reach an Improvement in Terms of Gas Exchange, Defined as a PaO2/FiO2 Ratio ≥3152437 minuteStandard Deviation 1170
Comparison: endpoint was analyzed in terms of time by comparison of mean +- SDp-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Mantainance

the number of subjects who could maintain, once reached, a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315 at 1 and 24 hours after the qualifying measurement

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure)PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Mantainance19 participants
VenturiPaO2/FiO2 Ratio Mantainance8 participants
p-value: 0.000007Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026