Skip to content

Role of Pancreatic Triglyceride Content in Beta-cell Function

Role of Pancreatic Triglyceride Content in Beta-cell Function

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00602953
Enrollment
101
Registered
2008-01-28
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2017-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

The study evaluates if fat accumulates in the pancreas in individuals at risk of developing obesity-related diabetes. It also evaluates if the amount of fat in the pancreas can predict the residual functional capacity of the pancreas (insulin secretion).

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention planned.

This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adults without prior history of pancreatic disease (other than diabetes)

Exclusion criteria

* use of unapproved medications * contraindications to the MRI procedure * contraindications to frequent blood draws * pregnancy * use of more than 2 alcoholic drinks/day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pancreatic and Liver FatWithin 1 month after screening visit.Pancreatic and liver triglyceride (fat) content measured by the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) technique in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI).
Beta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to GlucoseAt screening visit.Beta-cell function as measured by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). AIRg - acute insulin response to glucose. Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected.
Insulin Sensitivity (SI)At screening visit.Sensitivity index measured during frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected. Higher numbers indicates better insulin sensitivity Insulin sensitivity was estimated as Matsuda index using formula = 10,000 / (FPG x FPI x Glucosemean0-180 x Insulinmean0-180)0.5, where FPG = fasting plasma glucose and FPI = fasting plasma insulin.
Disposition Index (DI)At screening visit.Disposition index measured during frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected. Disposition index (DI) was used to characterize the correlation between β-cell sensitivity and insulin sensitivity and was determined using formula DI = AIRg x SI (from outcomes 2 and 3). Higher numbers indicates a better improvement in beta-cell function.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Volunteers
Normal weight and normal glucose tolerance. No intervention planned.: This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.
15
Pre-diabetes
Impaired fasting glucose of impaired glucose tolerance. No intervention planned.: This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.
26
Overweight
Overweight or obese volunteers, but with normal fasting and postprandial glucose levels. No intervention planned.: This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.
47
Type 2 Diabetes
Patients with type 2 diabetes. No intervention planned.: This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.
13
Type 1 Diabetes
Patients with type 1 diabetes. No intervention planned.: This is a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention is planned.
0
Total101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPre-diabetesOverweightHealthy VolunteersType 2 DiabetesType 1 DiabetesTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants47 Participants15 Participants13 Participants0 Participants101 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 Participants47 Participants15 Participants13 Participants101 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants35 Participants11 Participants10 Participants0 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants12 Participants4 Participants3 Participants0 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 260 / 470 / 130 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 260 / 470 / 130 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 260 / 470 / 130 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Beta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to Glucose

Beta-cell function as measured by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). AIRg - acute insulin response to glucose. Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected.

Time frame: At screening visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy VolunteersBeta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to Glucose197.55 microU/mL x min
Pre-diabetesBeta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to Glucose321.09 microU/mL x min
OverweightBeta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to Glucose519.33 microU/mL x min
Type 2 DiabetesBeta-cell Function; AIRg - Acute Insulin Response to Glucose8.9 microU/mL x min
Primary

Disposition Index (DI)

Disposition index measured during frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected. Disposition index (DI) was used to characterize the correlation between β-cell sensitivity and insulin sensitivity and was determined using formula DI = AIRg x SI (from outcomes 2 and 3). Higher numbers indicates a better improvement in beta-cell function.

Time frame: At screening visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy VolunteersDisposition Index (DI)1001.8 Number
Pre-diabetesDisposition Index (DI)739.84 Number
OverweightDisposition Index (DI)1031.26 Number
Type 2 DiabetesDisposition Index (DI)15.61 Number
Primary

Insulin Sensitivity (SI)

Sensitivity index measured during frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI). Blood samples were collected at -5, -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 19, 22, 25, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, 140, and 180 minutes, where time 0 is when an i.v. bolus of 50% glucose solution (0.3 g/kg) was injected. Higher numbers indicates better insulin sensitivity Insulin sensitivity was estimated as Matsuda index using formula = 10,000 / (FPG x FPI x Glucosemean0-180 x Insulinmean0-180)0.5, where FPG = fasting plasma glucose and FPI = fasting plasma insulin.

Time frame: At screening visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy VolunteersInsulin Sensitivity (SI)5.48 min-1 per pU/mL x 10v4
Pre-diabetesInsulin Sensitivity (SI)2.28 min-1 per pU/mL x 10v4
OverweightInsulin Sensitivity (SI)2.29 min-1 per pU/mL x 10v4
Type 2 DiabetesInsulin Sensitivity (SI)1.55 min-1 per pU/mL x 10v4
Primary

Pancreatic and Liver Fat

Pancreatic and liver triglyceride (fat) content measured by the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) technique in volunteers with a wide range of body mass index (BMI).

Time frame: Within 1 month after screening visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy VolunteersPancreatic and Liver FatPancreatic fat MRS1.87 percent
Healthy VolunteersPancreatic and Liver FatLiver fat MRS0.96 percent
Pre-diabetesPancreatic and Liver FatLiver fat MRS4.09 percent
Pre-diabetesPancreatic and Liver FatPancreatic fat MRS6.57 percent
OverweightPancreatic and Liver FatPancreatic fat MRS3.61 percent
OverweightPancreatic and Liver FatLiver fat MRS3.33 percent
Type 2 DiabetesPancreatic and Liver FatPancreatic fat MRS5.85 percent
Type 2 DiabetesPancreatic and Liver FatLiver fat MRS8.76 percent

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026