Skip to content

Thalidomide Versus Bortezomib in Melphalan Refractory Myeloma

Thalidomide Versus Bortezomib in Melphalan Refractory Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00602511
Enrollment
300
Registered
2008-01-28
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Melfalan refractory multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Relapsing, Refractory, Thalidomide, Bortezomib, Randomized clinical trial

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare thalidomide + dexamethasone with bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to melphalan therapy. The main goal is to find out which of these two 2:nd line regimens that offers the patients the best chance for a response with as long duration and as good quality of life as possible.

Detailed description

The study is an open randomized multicentre study in which patients with multiple myeloma refractory to melphalan therapy are randomized between bortezomib and thalidomide therapy, in both arms with the addition of dexamethasone. In case of failure to the initially given treatment the patient will be crossed over to the alternative treatment. The number of patients needed is calculated to 300, based upon the hypothesis of a 50% difference in progression free survival, a significance level of 95% and a power of 80%. With 12 patients being recruited each month during 25 months and a 4 months follow-up after the last included patient, the total study time will be 29 months. The dose regimens for bortezomib and thalidomide follow general clinical praxis as regards recommendations for optimal dosing in the Nordic countries. Evaluation of response and toxicity is performed every 3 weeks for at least 12 weeks, thereafter every 6 weeks. Evaluation of efficacy is done according to The International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. Evaluation of toxicity is done by CTCAE grading. Evaluation of quality of life is done by the EORTC QLQ30 questionnaires with the addition of the myeloma specific MY-24 module which are mailed to the patients at predetermined intervals during the study.

Interventions

DRUGBortezomib

Bortezomib 1,3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 och 11 of every 3 weeks cycle until maximal response, toxicity or maximum 8 cycles Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12 during the first 2 cycles, thereafter individualized dose depending on response and toxicity

DRUGThalidomide

Thalidomide 50 mg/day with dose escalation every 3 weeks until response or toxicity, maximal dose 200 mg/day Dexamethasone 40 mg/day day 1-4 every 3 weeks for at least 2 courses, thereafter individualized dose depending on response and toxicity

Sponsors

Nordic Myeloma Study Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Treatment demanding multiple myeloma * Refractoriness to melphalan * Acceptance of rules for prevention of pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide, or lenalidomide * Sensory neuropathy grade III or neuropathic pain grade II * Severe concomitant disorder, e.g. other malignancy or severe heart disease * Transformation to plasma cell leukemia or aggressive lymphoma * Frequent visits for bortezomib injections not feasible * Anticipated non-adherence to study protocol * Pregnancy * Anticipated non-adherence to rules for prevention of pregnancy * Severe thrombocytopenia (Thrombocyte count less than 25000/microliter)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression free survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Response rate
Response duration
Time to start of other treatment
Response duration after cross-over
Quality of life
Response rate after cross-over
Toxicity

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026