Skip to content

Labour Induction With Misoprostol, Dinoprostone and Bard Catheter

A Randomised Comparison Between Intravaginal Dinoprostone Intravaginal Misoprostol and Transcervical Balloon Catheter for Labour Induction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00602095
Acronym
LI
Enrollment
592
Registered
2008-01-28
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2007-03-31
Last updated
2008-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

Labor induction, cervical ripening, misoprostol, dinoprostone, balloon catheter, prostaglandin

Brief summary

This is a randomised study aimed at comparing the currently most frequently used prostaglandin dinoprostone to two other methods, the cheaper and perhaps more effective prostaglandin misoprostol and a transcervical catheter. 592 women were recruited and randomised to one of the three methods. The main outcome measures were time to delivery, rate of instrumental deliveries and maternal neonatal outcome. Our hypothesis was that misoprostol would be superior to the other methods. The main finding of our trial was that the catheter showed the shortest induction to delivery interval. There were no differences between the two other prostaglandins. No differences in maternal and neonatal outcome was found

Interventions

DEVICEBard Catheter (balloon catheter)

Intracervical balloon catheter positioned above internal cervical os and filled with sterile water. Removed when cervix was dilated

DRUGdinoprostone

2mg vaginal gel every 6 hours until progress

DRUGmisoprostol

0.025mg tablet vaginally every 4 hour until progress

Sponsors

Karolinska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Full term singleton pregnancy with vertex presentation and with an indication for labour induction. * Absence of active labour * Bishop score ≤ 6. * Normal CTG registration

Exclusion criteria

* Previous cesarean section * signs of infection * immediate need for delivery * any contraindication for vaginal delivery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time from treatment start to deliveryAt delivery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026