Skip to content

A Study of an Antibiotic Implant in General Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Surgical Wound Infection

A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in General Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Surgical Wound Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00600925
Enrollment
602
Registered
2008-01-25
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2021-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Wound Infection

Keywords

Colorectal surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge is safe and effective for preventing surgical wound infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Detailed description

Surgical wound infection (SWI) is a significant problem in colorectal surgery. Despite the use of routine bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotics the incidence of SWI is at least 15% in patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures.Therefore, there is a long unmet need for an intervention that can reduce the incidence and severity of SWIs in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When inserted into a surgical site, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released at the site but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of antibiotic at the surgical site may prevent an infection at the surgical site. Outside of the United States more than 3,500 subjects have received treatment in clinical studies with the gentamicin-collagen sponge, primarily for orthopedic, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic surgeries or wound infections following surgical procedures or traumatic events. In this study, all subjects will be given treatment that is normally given to prevent surgical infections. For subjects randomly assigned to the gentamicin-collagen sponge treatment group, 2 sponges will be inserted into the surgical wound immediately before the surgeon closes it. The control group will receive no collagen sponge.

Interventions

2 gentamicin-collagen sponges inserted before closure of the laparotomy

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Premier Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Innocoll
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled to undergo nonemergent colon and/or rectal surgical procedures involving a laparotomy incision of at least 7 cm in length or greater. List of eligible procedures: Left Hemicolectomy, Transverse Colectomy, Segmental/Sleeve Left Colon Resection, Total Abdominal Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis, Total Abdominal Colectomy With Ileostomy, Total Abdominal Proctocolectomy (Portion Of Specimen To Be Extracted Via Laparotomy), Low Anterior Resection, Sigmoid Resection, Non-Emergent Hartmann's Procedure, Colotomy With Polypectomy Distal To Hepatic Flexure, Colostomy Takedown Through Laparotomy (Not Peristomal) Incision, Ileo-Pouch Anal Anastomosis, Abdominal Perineal Resection of the Rectum * Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent form. * Are male or female and \> 18 years of age. * If female, be postmenopausal (no menstrual period for a minimum of 1 year), or surgically sterilized (does not have a uterus or has had bilateral tubal ligation). Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test on entry in the study, and agree to use adequate birth control during the study and for 60 days after the administration of study agent. * Agree to be available for evaluation from baseline until final evaluation at 60 days postsurgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin or bovine collagen. * Undergoing emergency surgery (urgent surgery is allowed if informed consent is obtained and the study procedures can be performed). Emergency surgery includes cases where standard bowel preparation and other preoperative assessments cannot be done. * Undergoing a significant concomitant surgical procedure (e.g., hysterectomy). The following concomitant procedures are allowed: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, oophorectomy, liver biopsy/wedge resection (but not liver resection). * Undergoing a laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted, or other minimally invasive surgical approach involving a laparotomy incision less than 7 cm. * History of prior laparotomy within the last 60 days of this planned procedure. * Planned to undergo a second laparotomy or colorectal surgical procedure (e.g. colostomy or ileostomy takedown) within 60 days of this planned first procedure. * Evidence preoperatively of any of the following: sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock (note that SIRS alone is not an exclusion criterion) * Current abdominal wall infection/surgical site infection from previous laparotomy/laparoscopy or for any reason. * Receiving antibiotic therapy within the 1 week prior to the date of surgery. * Preoperative evaluation suggests intra-abdominal process that might preclude full closure of the skin. * History of ongoing treatment (e.g. chemotherapy, radiation) for non-colorectal cancer. * Recent history of significant drug or alcohol abuse. * Preoperative prothrombin time (PT) \> 1.5 times upper limit of normal * Pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential not practicing a birth control method with a high degree of reliability * Postsurgical life expectancy ≤ 60 days, in the investigator's or sponsor's opinion. * Refusal to accept medically indicated blood products. * Previous participation in this or any other active Innocoll Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge study. * Participation within 30 days before the start of this study in any experimental drug or device study, or currently participating in a study in which the administration of investigational drug or device within 60 days is anticipated. * Surgeon does not believe that it will be possible to insert 2 sponges above the fascia in the patient (e.g. in a very thin patient planned to have a small incision) * Patients with anterior abdominal wall mesh that is not planned to be completely removed during the planned procedure. * Presence of prosthetic cardiac valve.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 60assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60Primarily, efficacy will be evaluated by a comparison between the 2 study groups of the incidence of surgical wound infections (involving the laparotomy incision) that occur within the period from surgery through postop day 60.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Had Superficial Incisional Surgical Wound Infectionassessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60Number of Participants who had superficial incisional surgical wound infection, based on CDC criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the Proportion of Patients With Deep Incisional Surgical Wound Infectionassessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60The proportion of subjects who had deep incisional SWI, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the ASEPSIS ScoreDays 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60.Mean (SD) ASEPSIS Score Through 60 Days Postoperatively - brief assessment of surgical wound on post-operative Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60. Score from each time point is added up and the mean score is reported. Used to compare antibiotic regimens for their effectiveness in preventing or treating wound sepsis, well-defined criteria for outcome are needed. A method of assessing wound healing has been devised that defines carefully the characteristics to be considered and how they are to be awarded points. Objective criteria are also included in the assessment. Points are given for the need for Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay (ASEPSIS). The higher the points the worse outcome. Maximum Points would be 60. Minimum points would be 0
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on Length of Hospital Stay Postoperatively.Immediate post operative period
Number of Participants Who Were Rehospitalized for Surgical Wound Infection Within 60 Days Post-operativelyThrough 60 days after surgeryThe effect of the gentamicin-collagen sponge on rehospitalization for surgical wound infection.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gentamicin Group Group
Insertion of 2 gentamicin-collagen sponges before closure of the laparotomy (each 10 x 10 cm sponge contains 280 mg collagen and 130 mg gentamicin). gentamicin-collagen sponge dipped in saline: 2 gentamicin-collagen sponges inserted before closure of the laparotomy
300
Control Group
Standard of care, ie, no gentamicin-collagen sponge.
302
Total602

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalGentamicin Group Group
Age, Continuous56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.81
56.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.57
56.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.36
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants41 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
273 Participants545 Participants272 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
158 Participants339 Participants181 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
144 Participants263 Participants119 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2965 / 306
other
Total, other adverse events
294 / 296302 / 306
serious
Total, serious adverse events
114 / 296101 / 306

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 60

Primarily, efficacy will be evaluated by a comparison between the 2 study groups of the incidence of surgical wound infections (involving the laparotomy incision) that occur within the period from surgery through postop day 60.

Time frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 6090 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 6063 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Superficial Incisional Surgical Wound Infection

Number of Participants who had superficial incisional surgical wound infection, based on CDC criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee

Time frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Who Had Superficial Incisional Surgical Wound Infection61 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Had Superficial Incisional Surgical Wound Infection41 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Rehospitalized for Surgical Wound Infection Within 60 Days Post-operatively

The effect of the gentamicin-collagen sponge on rehospitalization for surgical wound infection.

Time frame: Through 60 days after surgery

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Who Were Rehospitalized for Surgical Wound Infection Within 60 Days Post-operatively21 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Were Rehospitalized for Surgical Wound Infection Within 60 Days Post-operatively13 Participants
Secondary

The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on Length of Hospital Stay Postoperatively.

Time frame: Immediate post operative period

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin GroupThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on Length of Hospital Stay Postoperatively.7.5 daysStandard Deviation 6.19
ControlThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on Length of Hospital Stay Postoperatively.7.3 daysStandard Deviation 5.42
Secondary

The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the ASEPSIS Score

Mean (SD) ASEPSIS Score Through 60 Days Postoperatively - brief assessment of surgical wound on post-operative Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60. Score from each time point is added up and the mean score is reported. Used to compare antibiotic regimens for their effectiveness in preventing or treating wound sepsis, well-defined criteria for outcome are needed. A method of assessing wound healing has been devised that defines carefully the characteristics to be considered and how they are to be awarded points. Objective criteria are also included in the assessment. Points are given for the need for Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay (ASEPSIS). The higher the points the worse outcome. Maximum Points would be 60. Minimum points would be 0

Time frame: Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60.

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin GroupThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the ASEPSIS Score6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
ControlThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the ASEPSIS Score5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.99
Secondary

The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the Proportion of Patients With Deep Incisional Surgical Wound Infection

The proportion of subjects who had deep incisional SWI, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee

Time frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the Proportion of Patients With Deep Incisional Surgical Wound Infection25 Participants
ControlThe Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the Proportion of Patients With Deep Incisional Surgical Wound Infection18 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026