Skip to content

Impact of Fluid Restriction Policy in Reducing the Use of Red Cells in Cardiac Surgery

Impact of Fluid Restriction Policy Added to Intra-Operative Cell Salvage in Reducing the Use of Red Cells in Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00600704
Enrollment
192
Registered
2008-01-25
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2011-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Artery Disease, Erythrocyte Transfusion

Keywords

Allogenic Blood Use, Total Blood Loss, Reinfusion of Washed Shed Blood

Brief summary

The investigators' hypothesis is that restriction of circulating fluids in comparison to a liberal fluid administration policy would lead to a reduction of allogenic red blood cells exposure in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for primary coronary artery bypass graft supported by reinfusion of washed shed blood from thoracic cavities.

Detailed description

192 patients operated under equal conditions were assigned prospectively and randomly either for a restrictive protocol for intravenous fluid administration (group A, 100 patients) or not (group B, 92 patients). Transfusion guidelines were common for the two groups. The volumes of intravenous fluids, priming, extra volume on pump and cardioplegic solution and the volume of urine were recorded. Net erythrocyte volume loss was calculated. The number of the transfused PRC was analyzed as a continuous variable. Transfusion was analyzed as a categorical characteristic. Analysis employed Student's two-tailed t-test, t-paired test and chitest.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFluid Restriction Policy

Infusion of Hes 130/0.4 up to 500 ml until the beginning of Cardiopulmonary bypass

PROCEDUREFree fluid infusion

Free fluid infusion unless Hb\< 6g/dl(allogenic blood use), until the beginning of Cardiopulmonary bypass

Sponsors

Larissa University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ejection fraction (EF) of left ventricle (LV) \> 35% * Preoperative serum Creatinine \< 150 μmol/l * Preoperative Haemoglobin \> 10/dl * Peripheral anastomosis scheduled =\< 3

Exclusion criteria

* redo bypass-emergency operations * prior coronal stenting * active congestive heart failure * documented Myocardial Infraction within the previous 6 weeks * NYHA class \> 3 * Carotid stenosis \> 50% * CVA * INR \> 1.5 * chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * Steroid therapy-chronic inflammatory process * Use of aprotinin or tranexamic acid

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Number of Packed Red Cells Units Transfused During Hospital Stay20 months

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This prospective study was conducted in our University Hospital over a 20-month period, after approval from the Institution Ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients before entering the study. All the participants were patients of the Cardio-Thoracic Clinic of our Hospital.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusion criteria were emergency or re-do operations, operations starting after 18.00, administration of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) or other thrombolytic medications, pre-existing hematologic disease or coagulation abnormality, advanced cirrhosis, renal failure, preoperative blood product transfusion, combined cardiac and carotid surgery.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RESTRICTED FLUIDS
Infusion of Hes 130/0.4 up to 500 ml
100
FREE FLUIDS
Free fluid infusion unless Hb\< 6g/dl(allogenic blood use)
92
Total192

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFREE FLUIDSRESTRICTED FLUIDSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
92 Participants100 Participants192 Participants
Age Continuous65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
65.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Region of Enrollment
Greece
92 participants100 participants192 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
76 Participants83 Participants159 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 1002 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 10018 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Number of Packed Red Cells Units Transfused During Hospital Stay

Time frame: 20 months

Population: Patients between ages 18-85 undergoing elective cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
RESTRICTED FLUIDSMean Number of Packed Red Cells Units Transfused During Hospital Stay1.13 packed red cells units
FREE FLUIDSMean Number of Packed Red Cells Units Transfused During Hospital Stay1.91 packed red cells units
Comparison: Sample size calculation was based on a two-sided alpha error of .05 and 80% power. After applying the protocol in two equal groups of 10 patients, the analysis showed that the study requires 60 patients per group. However, we decided to enroll up to 100 patients per group to allow for patient attrition or missing data, and also in order to look for differences with regards to transfusion between patient subgroups.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.189, 0.569]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Null hypothesis :restrictive fluid protocol does not have any effect concerning the mean number of PRC units transfused.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.465, 1.129]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026