Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Implant in Cardiac Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Sternal Wound Infection

A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in Cardiac Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Sternal Wound Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00600483
Enrollment
1502
Registered
2008-01-25
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2022-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Surgery, Sternal Wound Infection

Keywords

obesity, diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge is safe and effective in preventing sternal wound infections in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are at a greater risk of developing sternal wound infections.

Detailed description

Sternal wound infection (SWI) is a significant problem in cardiac surgical subjects,in particular in those with risk factors such as diabetes and obesity. There is a long unmet need for an intervention that can reduce the incidence and severity of SWIs in high-risk subjects. Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When inserted into a surgical site, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released at the site but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of antibiotic at the surgical site may prevent an infection at the surgical site. Outside of the United States more than 3,500 subjects have received treatment in clinical studies with the gentamicin-collagen sponge, primarily for orthopedic, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic surgeries or wound infections following surgical procedures or traumatic events. In this study, all subjects will be given treatment that is normally given to prevent surgical infections. For subjects randomly assigned to the gentamicin-collagen sponge treatment group, 2 sponges will be placed between the sternal halves during surgery. IMMEDIATELY before insertion of the sponge the surgeon should wet the sponge with saline as shown in the training/certification document. This wet sponge SHOULD BE INSERTED INTO THE STERNUM WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 15 SECONDS (AFTER THIS TIME IT MAY BECOME MORE DIFFICULT TO HANDLE). All subjects will be followed for 90 days after surgery to determine whether they develop a sternal wound infection.

Interventions

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Premier Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Innocoll
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled to undergo nonemergent CABG and/or valve repair or replacement surgery through a full median sternotomy. This includes the following eligible procedures: isolated CABG surgery, isolated valve surgery, and combined CABG + valve surgery. * Be at higher risk for SWI, defined as the presence of diabetes mellitus (treated with either oral agent or insulin) and/or obesity, defined as BMI \> 30. * Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent form. * Are male or female and \> 18 years of age. * If female, be postmenopausal (no menstrual period for a minimum of 1 year), be surgically sterilized and have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test on entry in the study, or agree to use adequate birth control during the study and for 3 months after the administration of study agent. Medically acceptable contraceptives include: (1) approved hormonal contraceptives (such as birth control pills, Depo-Provera, or Lupron Depot), (2) barrier methods (such as a condom or diaphragm) used with a spermicide, or (3) an intrauterine device (IUD). * Agree to be available for evaluation from baseline until final evaluation at 90 days postsurgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin or bovine collagen. * Undergoing emergency cardiac surgery (urgent surgery is allowed if informed consent is obtained and the study procedures can be performed). * Undergoing a significant concomitant surgical procedure (eg, carotid endarterectomy, aortic root repair or replacement, DHCA, or pulmonary resection). * Undergoing a minimally invasive or a thoracic surgical approach. * Using a preoperative mechanical assist device or IABP if inserted for shock/low output syndrome (an IABP is allowed if it is inserted for unstable angina). * Active and significant systemic infection, eg active endocarditis, or a history of significant recurrent systemic infection. * Receiving antibiotic therapy within the 2 weeks before the date of surgery. * Preoperative serum creatinine \> 3 mg/dL or renal failure requiring dialysis. * History of malignancy within the past year (except for squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence). * History of major organ transplantation, including bone marrow transplantation. * Recent history of significant drug or alcohol abuse. * Taking systemic immunosuppressive drugs, including steroids (at a dose \> 10 mg oral prednisone daily) or a history of a current immunosuppressive condition (eg, symptomatic HIV infection), defined as a CD4 count \< 200. * Scheduled to receive stress doses of glucocorticoids (ie, doses \> 2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone or equivalent). * Pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential not practicing a birth control method with a high degree of reliability (defined in section 3.1). * Postsurgical life expectancy ≤ 90 days, in the investigator's or sponsor's opinion. * Refusal to accept medically indicated blood products. * Current participation or participation within 30 days before the start of this study in another experimental drug or device study, or is currently participating in a study during which the administration of investigational drugs within 90 days is anticipated. * Has a moderate or severe pectus deformity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 9090 days post cardiac surgeryEfficacy will be evaluated by a comparison between the 2 study groups of the incidence of surgical wound infections that occur within the period from surgery through postop day 90.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With Deep Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.90 days post cardiac surgery
Proportion of Patients With Superficial Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.90 days post cardiac surgery
Surgically Treated Surgical Wound Infection Postoperative Day 9090 days post cardiac surgeryProportion of patients with surgically treated surgical wound infection adjudicated by an independent blinded committee.
ASEPSIS Score90 days post cardiac surgeryASEPSIS Score through 90 days postoperative - To compare antibiotic regimens for their effectiveness in preventing or treating wound sepsis, well-defined criteria for outcome are needed. A method of assessing wound healing has been devised that defines carefully the characteristics to be considered and how they are to be awarded points. Objective criteria are also included in the assessment. Points are given for the need for Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay (ASEPSIS). The higher the points the worse outcome. Maximum Points would be 60. Minimum points would be 0
Rehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection90 days post cardiac surgeryRehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection - within 90 days postoperatively.
Number of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen Culture90 days post cardiac surgeryAnalysis associated with Microbial Pathogens in Adjudicated 90 Day SWI Subjects ME within Per Protocol Population. Any Microbial Pathogens Detected in SWI (ME)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gentamicin Group
Insertion of 2 gentamicin-collagen sponges between the sternal halves before closure of the sternotomy gentamicin-collagen sponge dipped in saline: 100-cm2 sponge
753
Control Group
Standard of care, ie, insertion of no gentamicin-collagen sponge.
749
Total1,502

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2647
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalGentamicin Group
Age, Continuous64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.19
64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
59 Participants115 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
683 Participants1371 Participants688 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
219 Participants442 Participants223 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
530 Participants1060 Participants530 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
19 / 74327 / 759
other
Total, other adverse events
741 / 743757 / 759
serious
Total, serious adverse events
269 / 743290 / 759

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 90

Efficacy will be evaluated by a comparison between the 2 study groups of the incidence of surgical wound infections that occur within the period from surgery through postop day 90.

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 9063 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 9065 Participants
Secondary

ASEPSIS Score

ASEPSIS Score through 90 days postoperative - To compare antibiotic regimens for their effectiveness in preventing or treating wound sepsis, well-defined criteria for outcome are needed. A method of assessing wound healing has been devised that defines carefully the characteristics to be considered and how they are to be awarded points. Objective criteria are also included in the assessment. Points are given for the need for Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay (ASEPSIS). The higher the points the worse outcome. Maximum Points would be 60. Minimum points would be 0

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin GroupASEPSIS Score1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Control GroupASEPSIS Score2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Secondary

Number of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen Culture

Analysis associated with Microbial Pathogens in Adjudicated 90 Day SWI Subjects ME within Per Protocol Population. Any Microbial Pathogens Detected in SWI (ME)

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

Population: PP Population: INN-SWI-001)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureProteus mirabilis4 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureKlebsiella pneumoniae0 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureProvidencia stuartii1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEnterobacter cloacae2 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CulturePseudomonas aeruginosa3 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureKlebsiella spp1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureSerratia marcescens2 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEscherichia coli3 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus aureus5 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureMethicillin-resistant SA2 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus capitis1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureCoagulase-neg staphylococci0 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus epidermidis2 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus hominis0 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureMethicillin-sensitive SA6 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus lugdunensis0 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureGroup B species streptococcus1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus xylosus0 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureOther Specify 13 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStreptococcus agalactiae1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEnterococcus faecalis1 participants
Gentamicin GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureAcinetobacter calcoaceticus1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus epidermidis7 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureAcinetobacter calcoaceticus0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureCoagulase-neg staphylococci2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEnterobacter cloacae1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEnterococcus faecalis1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureEscherichia coli3 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureGroup B species streptococcus0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureKlebsiella pneumoniae2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureKlebsiella spp2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureMethicillin-resistant SA1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureMethicillin-sensitive SA2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureOther Specify 13 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureProteus mirabilis5 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureProvidencia stuartii0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CulturePseudomonas aeruginosa3 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureSerratia marcescens4 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus aureus6 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus capitis0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus hominis1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus lugdunensis1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStaphylococcus xylosus1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Positive for Each Pathogen CultureStreptococcus agalactiae0 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Deep Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupProportion of Patients With Deep Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.14 Participants
Control GroupProportion of Patients With Deep Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.19 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Superficial Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupProportion of Patients With Superficial Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.49 Participants
Control GroupProportion of Patients With Superficial Surgical Wound Infections Based on Centers for Disease Control Criteria Adjudicated by an Independent Blinded Committee.46 Participants
Secondary

Rehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection

Rehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection - within 90 days postoperatively.

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupRehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection23 Participants
Control GroupRehospitalization for Sternal Wound Infection24 Participants
Secondary

Surgically Treated Surgical Wound Infection Postoperative Day 90

Proportion of patients with surgically treated surgical wound infection adjudicated by an independent blinded committee.

Time frame: 90 days post cardiac surgery

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin GroupSurgically Treated Surgical Wound Infection Postoperative Day 9025 Participants
Control GroupSurgically Treated Surgical Wound Infection Postoperative Day 9037 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026